| | CFB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
| | |
|
| | | |
403 | SMU | +8.5 | Over 45.5 | 404 | UTEP | +3.5 | Under 57.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 1-3 | -2 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 23.7 | 8.5 | 341.0 | (4.6) | 3.2 | 32.7 | 16.2 | 460.0 | (5.6) | 3.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 24.0 | 3.0 | 507.0 | (5.5) | 3.0 | 59.0 | 24.0 | 613.0 | (9.1) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 23.7 | 10.3 | 285.7 | (4.2) | 3.3 | 24.0 | 13.7 | 409.0 | (4.7) | 4.0 | Turf Games | 1-3 | -2 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 23.7 | 8.5 | 341.0 | (4.6) | 3.2 | 32.7 | 16.2 | 460.0 | (5.6) | 3.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 23.7 | 8.5 | 18.5 | 32:19 | 26-88 | (3.4) | 24-48 | 49.7% | 253 | (5.2) | 74-341 | (4.6) | (14.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.3 | 13.6 | 19.2 | 32:51 | 33-118 | (3.5) | 22-39 | 57.1% | 272 | (7) | 72-390 | (5.4) | (14.8) | Offense Road Games | 24.0 | 3.0 | 28.0 | 39:55 | 29-145 | (5) | 37-63 | 58.7% | 362 | (5.7) | 92-507 | (5.5) | (21.1) | Defense (All Games) | 32.7 | 16.2 | 23.2 | 27:41 | 37-143 | (3.9) | 27-45 | 58.8% | 316 | (7) | 82-460 | (5.6) | (14) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 38.2 | 20.4 | 26.7 | 28:09 | 36-160 | (4.5) | 28-44 | 64.1% | 344 | (7.7) | 80-504 | (6.3) | (13.2) | Defense Road Games | 59.0 | 24.0 | 26.0 | 20:05 | 32-220 | (6.9) | 24-35 | 68.6% | 393 | (11.2) | 67-613 | (9.1) | (10.4) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 1-4 | -2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 20.4 | 10.6 | 338.2 | (4.9) | 1.2 | 29.0 | 14.4 | 453.0 | (6.3) | 2.0 | Home Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 24.0 | 17.0 | 371.0 | (5.5) | 0.0 | 26.0 | 7.0 | 414.5 | (5.3) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 28.3 | 15.3 | 375.0 | (5.3) | 1.7 | 31.0 | 14.7 | 433.3 | (6) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 1-3 | -1 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 21.0 | 10.7 | 347.2 | (5) | 0.5 | 29.2 | 14.5 | 447.5 | (6.4) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 302.0 | (4.6) | 4.0 | 28.0 | 14.0 | 475.0 | (6) | 4.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.4 | 10.6 | 18.8 | 29:55 | 34-130 | (3.8) | 18-34 | 52.0% | 208 | (6.1) | 69-338 | (4.9) | (16.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.7 | 12.6 | 18.9 | 31:58 | 36-146 | (4) | 19-32 | 58.8% | 225 | (7) | 68-371 | (5.4) | (15) | Offense Home Games | 24.0 | 17.0 | 20.0 | 29:25 | 36-192 | (5.3) | 15-31 | 48.4% | 179 | (5.8) | 67-371 | (5.5) | (15.5) | Defense (All Games) | 29.0 | 14.4 | 23.8 | 30:05 | 39-216 | (5.5) | 19-33 | 59.5% | 237 | (7.3) | 72-453 | (6.3) | (15.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.7 | 13 | 20.7 | 29:02 | 36-152 | (4.2) | 20-32 | 60.6% | 235 | (7.3) | 68-387 | (5.7) | (14) | Defense Home Games | 26.0 | 7.0 | 24.0 | 30:34 | 36-158 | (4.4) | 20-41 | 49.4% | 256 | (6.2) | 77-414 | (5.3) | (15.9) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SMU 38.5, UTEP 35.8 |
| | |
|
|
9/2/2012 | @ BAYLOR | 24-59 | L | 6.5 | L | 57 | O | 29-145 | 37-63-362 | 3 | 32-220 | 24-35-393 | 0 | 9/8/2012 | SF AUSTIN | 52-0 | W | -17 | W | | - | 29-72 | 21-41-256 | 3 | 26-75 | 43-74-391 | 10 | 9/15/2012 | TEXAS A&M | 3-48 | L | 10 | L | 60.5 | U | 25-106 | 23-49-203 | 1 | 42-225 | 28-45-380 | 0 | 9/29/2012 | TCU | 16-24 | L | 13.5 | W | 51.5 | U | 22-30 | 15-40-190 | 6 | 47-54 | 12-28-102 | 2 | 10/6/2012 | @ UTEP | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/18/2012 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/1/2012 | OKLAHOMA | 7-24 | L | 29.5 | W | 63 | U | 36-207 | 7-26-48 | 0 | 37-205 | 21-36-222 | 0 | 9/8/2012 | @ OLE MISS | 10-28 | L | 8 | L | 53 | U | 30-37 | 27-40-274 | 1 | 46-332 | 16-23-206 | 3 | 9/15/2012 | NEW MEXICO ST | 41-28 | W | -14 | L | 58.5 | O | 37-177 | 23-36-310 | 0 | 35-112 | 20-47-290 | 1 | 9/22/2012 | @ WISCONSIN | 26-37 | L | 18 | W | 50.5 | O | 33-77 | 22-39-259 | 1 | 40-213 | 12-17-210 | 2 | 9/29/2012 | @ E CAROLINA | 18-28 | L | 4 | L | 48.5 | U | 36-151 | 10-30-151 | 4 | 39-217 | 28-40-258 | 4 | 10/6/2012 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/11/2012 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | SMU: SMU's success this season will rest upon the shoulders of the University of Texas outcast, Garrett Gilbert, who was once considered a phenomenal QB prospect, but he struggled in Big 12 play (13 TD, 23 INT). Gilbert's best play will be handing off to RB Zach Line who has rushed for 2,718 yards and 27 TD in his past two seasons. The Mustangs are completely retooling their offensive line, but if Gilbert has time to throw, he'll be targeting a legit star wideout in Darius Johnson (1,118 rec yds, 8 TD). June Jones may finally have the players to perfect his Run 'n' Shoot offense. The Mustangs will be returning six starters from a defensive unit that was second in C-USA last season (340 total YPG). They get back all of their linebackers, but must replace two talented defensive ends. The secondary will return a decent number of reliable starters, including CB Kenneth Acker (49 solo tackles, 4 PD) and S Ryan Smith (65 tackles, 4 PD). | | UTEP: Head coach Mike Price needs to deliver a winning season in 2012. The pressure will be on QB Nick Lamaison (1,718 pass yds, 12 TD, 10 INT) who unfortunately was derailed by a few injuries. This year he'll get back his two top targets in WRs Mike Edwards (657 rec yds, 3 TD) and Jordan Leslie (430 rec yds, 2 TD), as well as multiple pass-catching tight ends. RB Nathan Jeffery averaged 6.4 YPC last season and shows a lot of promise, especially with four starting OLs returning. The Miners defense struggled last year, allowing 442 YPG (104th in nation) and 49+ points three times. But the defensive line returns three quality starters and their linebackers will get a boost from Jamie Irving, who missed last season with shoulder injuries. The secondary could also be better with CB Drew Thomas (42 tackles, 5 PD) and S DeShawn Grayson (67 tackles, 2 INT) returning. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 12:02:00 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|