|
|
AIR FORCE UTAH ST |
|
| 60.5 | 32 Final 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
391 | AIR FORCE | +16.5 | Over 53.5 | 392 | UTAH ST | -4.5 | Under 65.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 32.5 | 15.5 | 367.5 | (4.8) | 1.5 | 16.5 | 9.5 | 300.0 | (5) | 1.5 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 27.0 | 7.0 | 373.0 | (5.4) | 1.0 | 33.0 | 19.0 | 525.0 | (7.6) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 32.5 | 15.5 | 367.5 | (4.8) | 1.5 | 16.5 | 9.5 | 300.0 | (5) | 1.5 | Turf Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 38.0 | 24.0 | 362.0 | (4.3) | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | (1.5) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 32.5 | 15.5 | 21.0 | 36:37 | 66-271 | (4.1) | 5-10 | 47.6% | 96 | (9.2) | 77-367 | (4.8) | (11.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 40.8 | 22.5 | 23.1 | 35:48 | 60-277 | (4.6) | 10-17 | 57.1% | 142 | (8.5) | 76-418 | (5.5) | (10.3) | Offense Road Games | 27.0 | 7.0 | 19.0 | 32:47 | 56-209 | (3.7) | 8-13 | 61.5% | 164 | (12.6) | 69-373 | (5.4) | (13.8) | Defense (All Games) | 16.5 | 9.5 | 14.5 | 23:23 | 29-42 | (1.4) | 20-30 | 66.7% | 258 | (8.6) | 59-300 | (5) | (18.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 16.5 | 9 | 14.1 | 25:12 | 38-125 | (3.3) | 14-26 | 53.6% | 144 | (5.5) | 64-269 | (4.2) | (16.3) | Defense Road Games | 33.0 | 19.0 | 25.0 | 27:13 | 29-54 | (1.9) | 33-40 | 82.5% | 471 | (11.8) | 69-525 | (7.6) | (15.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | 0 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 54.7 | 30.7 | 467.0 | (6.3) | 2.0 | 21.0 | 12.0 | 319.7 | (4.3) | 3.0 | Home Games | 2-0 | 0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 66.5 | 39.0 | 528.5 | (6.9) | 2.0 | 12.5 | 8.0 | 253.5 | (3.4) | 3.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 3-0 | 3-0 | 54.7 | 30.7 | 467.0 | (6.3) | 2.0 | 21.0 | 12.0 | 319.7 | (4.3) | 3.0 | Turf Games | 2-0 | 0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 66.5 | 39.0 | 528.5 | (6.9) | 2.0 | 12.5 | 8.0 | 253.5 | (3.4) | 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 54.7 | 30.7 | 25.0 | 27:21 | 38-206 | (5.5) | 25-37 | 69.1% | 261 | (7.1) | 74-467 | (6.3) | (8.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 47.1 | 26 | 25.9 | 29:18 | 41-209 | (5.1) | 25-36 | 69.0% | 268 | (7.5) | 76-477 | (6.2) | (10.1) | Offense Home Games | 66.5 | 39.0 | 26.5 | 29:54 | 44-297 | (6.7) | 23-33 | 71.2% | 231 | (7) | 77-528 | (6.9) | (7.9) | Defense (All Games) | 21.0 | 12.0 | 18.3 | 32:35 | 43-142 | (3.3) | 17-31 | 54.3% | 178 | (5.7) | 75-320 | (4.3) | (15.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 17.1 | 8.9 | 17.3 | 31:30 | 36-110 | (3.1) | 18-34 | 54.2% | 192 | (5.6) | 70-302 | (4.3) | (17.7) | Defense Home Games | 12.5 | 8.0 | 16.0 | 30:01 | 44-130 | (3) | 14-30 | 45.9% | 123 | (4) | 74-253 | (3.4) | (20.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: AIR FORCE 17.5, UTAH ST 18.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | STONY BROOK | 38-0 | W | -15 | W | | - | 77-333 | 2-8-29 | 2 | 30-30 | 7-20-45 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | @ FLA ATLANTIC | 27-33 | L | 7.5 | W | 59.5 | O | 56-209 | 8-13-164 | 1 | 29-54 | 33-40-471 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | @ UTAH ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | NEVADA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | NAVY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/12/2018 | @ SAN DIEGO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/19/2018 | @ UNLV | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2018 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 31-38 | L | 23.5 | W | 51.5 | O | 25-25 | 29-44-319 | 2 | 42-165 | 23-33-287 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | NEW MEXICO ST | 60-13 | W | -23.5 | W | 63 | O | 46-274 | 17-31-172 | 2 | 45-109 | 20-37-171 | 5 | 9/13/2018 | TENNESSEE TECH | 73-12 | W | -44 | W | 63.5 | O | 42-320 | 30-35-291 | 2 | 43-152 | 8-24-75 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | AIR FORCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/5/2018 | @ BYU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | UNLV | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ WYOMING | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| AIR FORCE: Perhaps no FBS defensive front was more feeble last season than the Falcons', which finished dead last in both sacks (10) and yards per carry allowed (6.0). The 2018 slate will take no mercy on this weak squad, whose out-of-division schedule features Florida Atlantic, Navy, San Diego State and Army. The bright spot of the roster is QB Arion Worthman, who is a terror running the option and will make games watchable for Air Force fans. | | UTAH ST: Quarterback Jordan Love showed promise after taking over the starting job midway through last season, and he'll be well-positioned to take big strides forward as a sophomore. The entire starting five along the offensive line returns, and WR Ron'quavion Tarver and TE Dax Raymond give him big targets to throw to. The real strength of this team is its defense, though, where nine starters are back from a unit that was solid in 2017, especially in the secondary. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/8/2024 1:34:00 AM EST. |
|
|