|
|
CHARLOTTE First Half Results UAB |
|
| 26 | 0 Final 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
187 | CHARLOTTE | 26.5 | 188 | UAB | -8.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | 0 | 2-2 | 3-0 | 25.5 | 11.2 | 357.0 | (4.9) | 1.2 | 32.2 | 19.5 | 347.5 | (6.2) | 1.5 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 31.0 | 10.0 | 364.0 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 49.0 | 35.0 | 331.0 | (6.1) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 22.7 | 10.7 | 313.3 | (4.2) | 1.3 | 39.7 | 23.7 | 367.7 | (6.9) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 2-2 | 0 | 2-2 | 3-0 | 25.5 | 11.2 | 357.0 | (4.9) | 1.2 | 32.2 | 19.5 | 347.5 | (6.2) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 28.0 | 13.0 | 373.0 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 25.0 | 12.0 | 338.0 | (6) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.5 | 11.2 | 21.0 | 37:15 | 44-142 | (3.2) | 18-29 | 61.7% | 215 | (7.5) | 73-357 | (4.9) | (14) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.4 | 15.2 | 22 | 34:46 | 45-199 | (4.4) | 17-28 | 60.7% | 231 | (8.4) | 73-430 | (5.9) | (13.3) | Offense Road Games | 31.0 | 10.0 | 22.0 | 36:38 | 41-81 | (2) | 23-36 | 63.9% | 283 | (7.9) | 77-364 | (4.7) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 32.2 | 19.5 | 15.5 | 22:45 | 28-99 | (3.5) | 16-27 | 59.6% | 249 | (9.1) | 56-347 | (6.2) | (10.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.4 | 17.3 | 19 | 26:14 | 30-129 | (4.2) | 20-35 | 57.5% | 277 | (7.9) | 66-406 | (6.2) | (13.3) | Defense Road Games | 49.0 | 35.0 | 16.0 | 23:22 | 35-142 | (4.1) | 12-19 | 63.2% | 189 | (9.9) | 54-331 | (6.1) | (6.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | -1.8 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 35.7 | 24.3 | 477.3 | (6.1) | 1.7 | 23.7 | 9.0 | 332.0 | (5.5) | 1.7 | Home Games | 2-0 | +1.6 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 41.5 | 24.5 | 498.5 | (6) | 2.0 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 266.5 | (4.4) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -1.8 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 35.7 | 24.3 | 477.3 | (6.1) | 1.7 | 23.7 | 9.0 | 332.0 | (5.5) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 2-1 | -1.8 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 35.7 | 24.3 | 477.3 | (6.1) | 1.7 | 23.7 | 9.0 | 332.0 | (5.5) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 35.7 | 24.3 | 29.0 | 34:12 | 50-280 | (5.6) | 16-28 | 56.6% | 197 | (7.1) | 78-477 | (6.1) | (13.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 41.3 | 21.8 | 25.5 | 29:58 | 40-213 | (5.4) | 19-31 | 61.4% | 251 | (8) | 71-464 | (6.5) | (11.2) | Offense Home Games | 41.5 | 24.5 | 30.5 | 36:50 | 55-277 | (5) | 17-28 | 62.5% | 221 | (7.9) | 83-498 | (6) | (12) | Defense (All Games) | 23.7 | 9.0 | 18.0 | 25:48 | 40-209 | (5.2) | 6-20 | 31.1% | 123 | (6.1) | 61-332 | (5.5) | (14) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.1 | 8.7 | 17.7 | 31:54 | 44-187 | (4.3) | 9-19 | 50.3% | 136 | (7.4) | 62-324 | (5.2) | (15.3) | Defense Home Games | 12.0 | 3.5 | 14.5 | 23:10 | 39-165 | (4.2) | 4-21 | 18.6% | 101 | (4.7) | 60-266 | (4.4) | (22.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CHARLOTTE 20, UAB 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | FORDHAM | 34-10 | W | -16.5 | W | | - | 47-221 | 13-20-267 | 1 | 16--9 | 22-47-296 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | APPALACHIAN ST | 9-45 | L | 14.5 | L | 48.5 | O | 43-95 | 12-25-108 | 2 | 35-139 | 15-15-295 | 2 | 9/13/2018 | OLD DOMINION | 28-25 | W | 1.5 | W | 47.5 | O | 46-171 | 23-34-202 | 1 | 28-123 | 16-28-215 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | 31-49 | L | 5.5 | L | 55 | O | 41-81 | 23-36-283 | 1 | 35-142 | 12-19-189 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | @ UAB | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | W KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ MIDDLE TENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | SOUTHERN MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2018 | SAVANNAH ST | 52-0 | W | -39 | W | | - | 54-285 | 23-29-263 | 2 | 38-155 | 1-17-23 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | @ COASTAL CAROLINA | 24-47 | L | -8.5 | L | 55 | O | 41-286 | 12-27-149 | 1 | 43-296 | 11-18-167 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | TULANE | 31-24 | W | 4 | W | 58 | U | 56-269 | 12-27-180 | 2 | 40-175 | 7-26-180 | 3 | 9/29/2018 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ LOUISIANA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ RICE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | NORTH TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | @ UTEP | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CHARLOTTE: Last year, Charlotte's 14.2 PPG was the third-worst mark in the nation. Now a new coaching staff is installing a pro-style offense in hopes of finding something that works. One thing the 49ers will look to rely on is the running game. Quarterback Hasaan Klugh has an impressive set of wheels, and Charlotte has a decent group of runners in the backfield. Klugh will, however, need to find a way to be more accurate as a passer. But the defense could actually be a strength. The 49ers return most of their talent on that side of the ball, and the linebacking corps and secondary are both above average. Still, this program isn't ready to do damage just yet. | | UAB: UAB's eight-win season last year might have been unexpected, but it wasn't a fluke. The Blazers have talent on both sides of the ball, and wideout Andre Wilson is one of the best skill-position players in the conference. Expect a big year from him in an offense that should be better than it was a year ago'quarterback A.J. Erdely knows how to spread it around. On defense, DT Garrett Marino will do his best to stuff the run, and the Blazers also have a talented secondary. Expect UAB to be playing in a bowl game this year, but don't bet on them contending for a conference title. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 11:42:27 AM EST. |
|
|