| | | |
| | |
|
| | | | |
|
|
All Games | 2-8 | -3.8 | 5-5 | 6-3 | 20.5 | 10.2 | 305.0 | (4.7) | 2.1 | 33.0 | 15.5 | 410.2 | (5.6) | 2.0 | Road Games | 0-5 | -2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 18.0 | 10.4 | 260.0 | (4.2) | 1.2 | 38.8 | 16.8 | 481.6 | (6.2) | 1.8 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 26.0 | 11.0 | 320.0 | (4.9) | 2.3 | 35.0 | 15.3 | 403.7 | (5.7) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 2-6 | -2.7 | 5-3 | 6-1 | 23.0 | 11.0 | 327.1 | (4.9) | 2.4 | 31.4 | 15.1 | 404.1 | (5.6) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 2-4 | +0.8 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 19.3 | 7.2 | 307.8 | (4.6) | 2.3 | 31.8 | 14.5 | 358.7 | (5.4) | 1.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.5 | 10.2 | 16.8 | 29:45 | 40-137 | (3.4) | 15-25 | 62.5% | 168 | (6.8) | 65-305 | (4.7) | (14.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.4 | 15.3 | 22.1 | 29:22 | 40-183 | (4.6) | 19-32 | 59.0% | 236 | (7.3) | 72-419 | (5.8) | (13.8) | Offense Road Games | 18.0 | 10.4 | 13.6 | 29:16 | 37-117 | (3.1) | 15-24 | 60.3% | 143 | (5.9) | 61-260 | (4.2) | (14.4) | Defense (All Games) | 33.0 | 15.5 | 23.4 | 30:15 | 36-155 | (4.3) | 23-36 | 63.6% | 255 | (7) | 73-410 | (5.6) | (12.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.6 | 14.2 | 21.9 | 31:35 | 36-149 | (4.1) | 23-37 | 61.4% | 259 | (7) | 73-407 | (5.6) | (13.7) | Defense Road Games | 38.8 | 16.8 | 26.0 | 30:44 | 38-156 | (4.1) | 27-39 | 68.7% | 325 | (8.3) | 77-482 | (6.2) | (12.4) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-7 | -2.3 | 5-5 | 5-4 | 30.6 | 14.2 | 421.7 | (5.7) | 2.3 | 35.5 | 18.0 | 432.1 | (6.1) | 1.6 | Home Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 39.2 | 19.4 | 423.2 | (6) | 2.2 | 32.8 | 15.0 | 398.6 | (5.6) | 1.4 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +0.6 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 36.7 | 13.7 | 487.7 | (6.3) | 3.7 | 35.0 | 18.0 | 417.0 | (5.7) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 3-4 | +1 | 5-2 | 3-3 | 34.0 | 15.6 | 422.0 | (5.8) | 2.3 | 30.3 | 16.0 | 376.4 | (5.5) | 1.4 | Conference Games | 2-4 | -2.3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 34.0 | 14.3 | 429.3 | (5.9) | 2.7 | 39.2 | 19.7 | 482.5 | (6.1) | 1.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.6 | 14.2 | 22.8 | 31:02 | 36-121 | (3.3) | 22-38 | 57.5% | 301 | (7.9) | 74-422 | (5.7) | (13.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 33.7 | 16.8 | 21.9 | 31:59 | 40-173 | (4.4) | 20-33 | 60.2% | 249 | (7.5) | 73-422 | (5.8) | (12.5) | Offense Home Games | 39.2 | 19.4 | 22.2 | 31:03 | 37-116 | (3.2) | 21-33 | 62.9% | 307 | (9.2) | 70-423 | (6) | (10.8) | Defense (All Games) | 35.5 | 18.0 | 21.6 | 28:58 | 40-179 | (4.5) | 20-31 | 63.2% | 253 | (8) | 71-432 | (6.1) | (12.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.5 | 14.2 | 21.1 | 29:59 | 37-151 | (4) | 21-36 | 59.2% | 244 | (6.8) | 73-394 | (5.4) | (13.8) | Defense Home Games | 32.8 | 15.0 | 20.4 | 28:57 | 41-177 | (4.3) | 19-31 | 61.0% | 222 | (7.2) | 72-399 | (5.6) | (12.2) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MEMPHIS 26.4, UAB 28.7 |
| | |
|
|
9/22/2012 | @ DUKE | 14-38 | L | 21.5 | L | 61 | U | 28-71 | 13-22-81 | 0 | 44-177 | 27-40-323 | 4 | 10/6/2012 | RICE | 14-10 | W | 5.5 | W | 60 | U | 51-164 | 9-14-81 | 2 | 28-104 | 16-30-117 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | @ E CAROLINA | 7-41 | L | 17.5 | L | 48.5 | U | 43-115 | 16-26-166 | 2 | 32-61 | 25-33-308 | 2 | 10/20/2012 | UCF | 17-35 | L | 24 | W | 50 | O | 45-240 | 20-28-121 | 3 | 34-229 | 15-26-122 | 1 | 10/27/2012 | @ SMU | 13-44 | L | 21 | L | 49 | O | 31-117 | 8-17-85 | 2 | 34-134 | 25-35-353 | 1 | 11/3/2012 | @ MARSHALL | 28-38 | L | 20 | W | 63.5 | O | 52-141 | 22-32-231 | 2 | 27-92 | 34-44-341 | 1 | 11/10/2012 | TULANE | 37-23 | W | -1 | W | 56 | O | 44-110 | 15-20-276 | 3 | 29-80 | 25-44-211 | 5 | 11/17/2012 | @ UAB | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2012 | SOUTHERN MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/22/2012 | @ OHIO ST | 15-29 | L | 35 | W | 60.5 | U | 34-144 | 28-46-259 | 2 | 37-204 | 12-20-143 | 0 | 9/29/2012 | TULSA | 42-49 | L | 13.5 | W | 58 | O | 35-1 | 20-30-337 | 3 | 46-241 | 23-39-237 | 2 | 10/6/2012 | SE LOUISIANA | 52-3 | W | -19.5 | W | | - | 38-156 | 24-32-356 | 0 | 30-47 | 10-24-78 | 2 | 10/13/2012 | @ HOUSTON | 17-39 | L | 13 | L | 67 | U | 27-35 | 23-49-339 | 2 | 49-186 | 34-46-380 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | E CAROLINA | 35-42 | L | 2 | L | 56 | O | 25-82 | 22-37-319 | 0 | 42-214 | 23-35-386 | 0 | 10/27/2012 | @ TULANE | 45-55 | L | -5.5 | L | 59 | O | 28-213 | 26-53-409 | 4 | 37-153 | 34-42-466 | 3 | 11/3/2012 | @ SOUTHERN MISS | 27-19 | W | 4 | W | 63.5 | U | 46-207 | 17-29-228 | 3 | 38-183 | 10-26-112 | 3 | 11/10/2012 | MARSHALL | 38-31 | W | 3 | W | 75 | U | 42-209 | 20-34-197 | 4 | 41-121 | 25-34-216 | 1 | 11/17/2012 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2012 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MEMPHIS: The Tigers are returning a decent number of starters on the offensive end, but none of those are quarterbacks. But new head coach Justin Fuente will run his up-tempo offense through QB Jacob Karam, a transfer from Texas Tech. Karam's No. 1 target will be sophomore WR Kevin Wright (36 rec, 398 yds), who is an athletic specimen at 6-foot-4 and 215 pounds. The broken running game from last season will again lean on the oft-injured Jerrell Rhodes (152 yds, 2 TD in 3 games). Defensively, this team can't get much worse (491 YPG, 4th-most in FBS) despite the loss of first round NFL draft pick, DT Dontari Poe. The front seven performed very well this spring and shows promise of being a better run-stopping unit, and hopefully eclipsing 14 sacks from last year. Fortunately, almost every member of the secondary is back from last year and that experience can only help a unit that finished dead last in the nation in passing yards allowed (299.4 YPG). | | UAB: UAB enters the season with a new head coach in Garrick McGee, who learned how to run the offense under Bobby Petrino. McGee, who replaces Neil Callaway, has a great offensive mind and both he and offensive coordinator Jeff Brohm should be able to make the most out of QB Jonathan Perry (2,042 pass yds, 10 TD, 8 INT). Perry had a rocky start to his freshman year for the Blazers, but played much better down the stretch with 7 TD and 1 INT in his final three games. The offensive line has lost four starters, so McGee's toughest job will be finding somebody to block for his QB. The Blazers have the talent and depth at WR and RB to do damage in the C-USA. Defensively, this team will be getting back impact players at the linebacker position and on the defensive line, where they struggled a year ago with the fewest sacks in FBS (eight). An improvement will really help the secondary, which lacks experience. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 8:19:09 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|