|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | +8 | 5-6 | 5-6 | 31.0 | 14.1 | 387.8 | (5.4) | 1.2 | 36.0 | 13.3 | 431.7 | (5.6) | 1.9 | Road Games | 2-3 | +2.9 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 30.4 | 11.0 | 363.2 | (5.5) | 0.8 | 42.4 | 17.4 | 481.0 | (6.2) | 1.2 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +5 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 41.7 | 22.3 | 491.3 | (6.2) | 1.3 | 36.3 | 10.3 | 459.7 | (5.9) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 4-5 | +7 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 28.8 | 12.7 | 372.4 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 33.1 | 12.1 | 403.1 | (5.3) | 2.1 | Conference Games | 4-3 | +9 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 31.9 | 14.4 | 399.4 | (5.3) | 1.1 | 33.7 | 11.6 | 441.7 | (5.6) | 2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 31.0 | 14.1 | 19.6 | 27:24 | 34-120 | (3.6) | 22-38 | 57.3% | 267 | (7) | 72-388 | (5.4) | (12.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.5 | 16.1 | 21.8 | 30:40 | 40-179 | (4.4) | 19-33 | 57.6% | 246 | (7.5) | 73-425 | (5.8) | (13.9) | Offense Road Games | 30.4 | 11.0 | 18.6 | 25:21 | 32-110 | (3.4) | 19-34 | 56.5% | 254 | (7.5) | 66-363 | (5.5) | (11.9) | Defense (All Games) | 36.0 | 13.3 | 23.7 | 32:36 | 45-203 | (4.5) | 20-32 | 61.7% | 229 | (7.1) | 78-432 | (5.6) | (12) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 33.5 | 17.4 | 22.4 | 30:17 | 42-210 | (5) | 18-30 | 58.6% | 223 | (7.3) | 73-433 | (6) | (12.9) | Defense Road Games | 42.4 | 17.4 | 26.4 | 34:39 | 44-211 | (4.7) | 23-34 | 66.9% | 270 | (8) | 78-481 | (6.2) | (11.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-9 | -6.2 | 4-7 | 3-7 | 23.8 | 10.5 | 375.0 | (5) | 2.1 | 30.1 | 15.6 | 410.5 | (5.7) | 1.6 | Home Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 29.6 | 15.2 | 412.2 | (5.8) | 1.6 | 24.8 | 9.8 | 406.0 | (5.4) | 1.6 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 33.0 | 14.7 | 420.0 | (6) | 1.3 | 34.3 | 22.3 | 463.3 | (6.3) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 2-8 | -5.2 | 4-6 | 3-6 | 24.5 | 10.5 | 372.2 | (5.2) | 1.8 | 30.0 | 15.1 | 421.5 | (5.7) | 1.6 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -5 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 26.1 | 12.4 | 386.1 | (5) | 1.9 | 32.0 | 16.4 | 436.9 | (6) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 23.8 | 10.5 | 20.3 | 28:26 | 48-206 | (4.3) | 14-26 | 51.9% | 169 | (6.4) | 75-375 | (5) | (15.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.8 | 16.8 | 22.8 | 30:53 | 43-206 | (4.7) | 19-31 | 59.6% | 235 | (7.5) | 75-441 | (5.9) | (13.4) | Offense Home Games | 29.6 | 15.2 | 20.4 | 26:45 | 49-253 | (5.1) | 12-22 | 54.5% | 159 | (7.1) | 72-412 | (5.8) | (13.9) | Defense (All Games) | 30.1 | 15.6 | 21.3 | 31:11 | 48-249 | (5.2) | 14-24 | 58.3% | 161 | (6.7) | 72-410 | (5.7) | (13.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.9 | 15.9 | 21.2 | 30:41 | 41-195 | (4.7) | 17-29 | 59.3% | 216 | (7.4) | 71-411 | (5.8) | (13.3) | Defense Home Games | 24.8 | 9.8 | 21.2 | 32:25 | 47-223 | (4.8) | 16-29 | 53.8% | 183 | (6.3) | 76-406 | (5.4) | (16.4) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: SMU 33.4, TULSA 29.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2018 | HOUSTN BAPTIST | 63-27 | W | -44.5 | L | 69.5 | O | 50-244 | 24-37-409 | 2 | 27-60 | 28-51-241 | 3 | 10/6/2018 | @ UCF | 20-48 | L | 26 | L | 74 | U | 39-83 | 24-42-237 | 1 | 43-256 | 19-37-285 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ TULANE | 27-23 | W | 9.5 | W | 55 | U | 32-36 | 21-40-291 | 1 | 46-168 | 14-23-153 | 3 | 10/27/2018 | CINCINNATI | 20-26 | L | 8.5 | W | 52 | U | 24-23 | 22-43-328 | 1 | 39-125 | 33-50-352 | 3 | 11/3/2018 | HOUSTON | 45-31 | W | 14 | W | 71.5 | O | 40-196 | 28-44-318 | 1 | 47-190 | 11-22-175 | 2 | 11/10/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | 62-50 | W | -17.5 | L | 66 | O | 39-315 | 20-30-279 | 0 | 49-365 | 25-40-215 | 1 | 11/16/2018 | MEMPHIS | 18-28 | L | 8 | L | 75 | U | 26-25 | 30-57-341 | 3 | 43-208 | 18-31-226 | 2 | 11/24/2018 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/4/2018 | @ HOUSTON | 26-41 | L | 17 | W | 71.5 | U | 57-199 | 13-31-227 | 3 | 41-312 | 19-27-165 | 3 | 10/12/2018 | S FLORIDA | 24-25 | L | 10 | W | 59.5 | U | 49-220 | 6-21-79 | 0 | 47-250 | 17-40-237 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ ARKANSAS | 0-23 | L | 7 | L | 54 | U | 40-133 | 8-25-127 | 2 | 53-196 | 11-19-131 | 2 | 10/27/2018 | TULANE | 17-24 | L | 2 | L | 48.5 | U | 35-135 | 12-26-180 | 1 | 55-312 | 10-19-92 | 1 | 11/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 49-19 | W | -19.5 | W | 59.5 | O | 57-470 | 9-14-168 | 1 | 50-255 | 14-28-232 | 3 | 11/10/2018 | @ MEMPHIS | 21-47 | L | 15.5 | L | 65.5 | O | 41-112 | 14-26-140 | 1 | 55-297 | 16-23-202 | 1 | 11/17/2018 | @ NAVY | 29-37 | L | 5.5 | L | 51 | O | 44-164 | 19-28-206 | 2 | 63-389 | 1-2-15 | 1 | 11/24/2018 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| SMU: Quarterback Ben Hicks and new head coach Sonny Dykes's Air Raid offense are a match made in heaven. The SMU wideouts might not be familiar faces, but this passing game is going to be successful. Meanwhile, running back Xavier Jones should do his part in a strong rushing attack. The Mustangs' problem is their defense. New coordinator Kevin Kane did a great job in the same role with Northern Illinois, but it's going to take some time to get the right kind of talent in. Until then, SMU will strictly be playing shootouts. It's not ready to contend just yet. | | TULSA: After a 10-win season in his second year with the program, head coach Philip Montgomery was looking like a star in the making. But his momentum took a big hit with last year's 2-10 season, and it's hard to imagine the Golden Hurricane being much better in 2018-19. They still have some serious question marks at the quarterback position, which severely handicaps a strong group of skill-position players. Defensively, Tulsa was miserable at every level last season. It'll get some help in the form of transfers, but that's not going to improve the team as much as it needs. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 11:29:58 AM EST. |
|
|