|
|
HOUSTON TULSA |
|
| 79.5 | 38 Final 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
149 | HOUSTON | -360 | 150 | TULSA | +280 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-0 | +4.8 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 48.3 | 25.3 | 592.7 | (7.1) | 0.7 | 23.0 | 10.3 | 379.0 | (5.4) | 3.0 | Road Games | 1-0 | +3.8 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 34.0 | 10.0 | 462.0 | (5) | 1.0 | 31.0 | 14.0 | 395.0 | (5.6) | 4.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +4.8 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 48.3 | 25.3 | 592.7 | (7.1) | 0.7 | 23.0 | 10.3 | 379.0 | (5.4) | 3.0 | Turf Games | 3-0 | +4.8 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 48.3 | 25.3 | 592.7 | (7.1) | 0.7 | 23.0 | 10.3 | 379.0 | (5.4) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 48.3 | 25.3 | 27.0 | 31:33 | 52-288 | (5.6) | 23-32 | 70.1% | 305 | (9.4) | 84-593 | (7.1) | (12.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 41.2 | 19.5 | 24.3 | 31:38 | 43-231 | (5.3) | 23-33 | 68.4% | 289 | (8.8) | 76-520 | (6.8) | (12.6) | Offense Road Games | 34.0 | 10.0 | 25.0 | 33:15 | 57-226 | (4) | 23-35 | 65.7% | 236 | (6.7) | 92-462 | (5) | (13.6) | Defense (All Games) | 23.0 | 10.3 | 18.7 | 28:27 | 30-66 | (2.2) | 25-40 | 61.2% | 313 | (7.8) | 71-379 | (5.4) | (16.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.7 | 15.5 | 19.1 | 29:26 | 36-130 | (3.6) | 21-34 | 62.2% | 282 | (8.3) | 70-412 | (5.9) | (13.9) | Defense Road Games | 31.0 | 14.0 | 25.0 | 26:45 | 26-70 | (2.7) | 27-45 | 60.0% | 325 | (7.2) | 71-395 | (5.6) | (12.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +3.1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 41.7 | 21.7 | 607.0 | (6.8) | 1.7 | 39.0 | 20.7 | 575.3 | (6.9) | 1.3 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 47.0 | 21.0 | 618.0 | (7.2) | 4.0 | 44.0 | 17.0 | 563.0 | (5.9) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +3.1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 41.7 | 21.7 | 607.0 | (6.8) | 1.7 | 39.0 | 20.7 | 575.3 | (6.9) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 2-0 | +3.1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 43.5 | 20.5 | 609.0 | (7) | 2.5 | 32.5 | 15.5 | 476.5 | (5.8) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 41.7 | 21.7 | 31.0 | 27:11 | 50-216 | (4.3) | 24-39 | 61.2% | 391 | (10.1) | 89-607 | (6.8) | (14.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.6 | 12.6 | 20.9 | 30:34 | 43-149 | (3.4) | 17-33 | 53.2% | 235 | (7.2) | 76-385 | (5.1) | (14.4) | Offense Home Games | 47.0 | 21.0 | 31.0 | 22:59 | 51-194 | (3.8) | 21-35 | 60.0% | 424 | (12.1) | 86-618 | (7.2) | (13.1) | Defense (All Games) | 39.0 | 20.7 | 29.0 | 32:49 | 52-270 | (5.2) | 22-31 | 70.2% | 305 | (9.7) | 83-575 | (6.9) | (14.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 33 | 16.8 | 23.3 | 30:26 | 45-206 | (4.6) | 19-32 | 58.8% | 248 | (7.7) | 77-454 | (5.9) | (13.7) | Defense Home Games | 44.0 | 17.0 | 30.0 | 37:01 | 61-300 | (4.9) | 23-35 | 65.7% | 263 | (7.5) | 96-563 | (5.9) | (12.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: HOUSTON 20.3, TULSA 29 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | TENNESSEE TECH | 52-24 | W | -37 | L | 54.5 | O | 44-272 | 27-38-355 | 1 | 33-29 | 16-26-312 | 1 | 9/12/2015 | @ LOUISVILLE | 34-31 | W | 13 | W | 56.5 | O | 57-226 | 23-35-236 | 1 | 26-70 | 27-45-325 | 4 | 9/26/2015 | TEXAS ST | 59-14 | W | -17.5 | W | 73.5 | U | 54-366 | 18-24-323 | 0 | 32-99 | 31-50-302 | 4 | 10/3/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/8/2015 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/16/2015 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/24/2015 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | FLA ATLANTIC | 47-44 | W | -4.5 | L | 68 | O | 51-194 | 21-35-424 | 4 | 61-300 | 23-35-263 | 0 | 9/12/2015 | @ NEW MEXICO | 40-21 | W | 6.5 | W | 71.5 | U | 59-279 | 16-30-321 | 1 | 47-224 | 11-21-166 | 2 | 9/19/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | 38-52 | L | 33.5 | W | 71 | O | 40-176 | 34-51-427 | 0 | 47-286 | 32-38-487 | 2 | 10/3/2015 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/10/2015 | LA MONROE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/17/2015 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/23/2015 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| HOUSTON: There is certainly enough talent to reach a bowl game for the ninth time in 11 seasons. The schedule is also favorable, as three of the four AAC road games are at Tulsa, Tulane and Connecticut, who were a combined 5-19 in conference play last season. Houston does have to take on all three teams with 7-1 records in the American, but faces both Cincinnati and Memphis at home in November. | | TULSA: Tulsa will be an exciting team to watch with its Baylor offense, but the porous defense will be the reason the team struggles to reach .500. The schedule isn't kind either, as Tulsa must face all five AAC schools that finished 2014 with a winning record in conference play (vs. Memphis, at Cincinnati, vs. UCF, at East Carolina, vs. Houston). But the Golden Hurricane should pad their win total with victories hosting 3-9 Florida Atlantic and 4-8 UL Monroe, as well as a trip to 4-8 New Mexico. It wouldn't be shocking to see Tulsa increase its two-win total threefold. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 1:09:28 PM EST. |
|
|