|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 9-4 | +3 | 9-4 | 4-8 | 32.4 | 17.0 | 398.3 | (5.4) | 1.2 | 21.8 | 12.4 | 399.6 | (5.3) | 1.6 | | Road Games | 4-2 | +3 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 30.7 | 16.7 | 364.3 | (5) | 1.0 | 26.3 | 14.3 | 419.2 | (5.6) | 1.2 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 30.7 | 17.0 | 405.7 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 34.0 | 20.7 | 432.7 | (6.1) | 1.7 | | Turf Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 32.5 | 20.5 | 426.0 | (5.3) | 1.0 | 26.5 | 17.0 | 394.0 | (5.4) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 32.4 | 17.0 | 22.0 | 29:07 | 38-182 | (4.8) | 21-36 | 56.8% | 216 | (6) | 74-398 | (5.4) | (12.3) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.9 | 15.5 | 21.2 | 30:12 | 39-180 | (4.6) | 19-32 | 59.1% | 227 | (7.2) | 71-407 | (5.7) | (13.6) | | Offense Road Games | 30.7 | 16.7 | 20.8 | 28:59 | 36-157 | (4.4) | 20-36 | 56.0% | 207 | (5.7) | 72-364 | (5) | (11.9) | | Defense (All Games) | 21.8 | 12.4 | 21.9 | 30:49 | 43-193 | (4.4) | 18-32 | 55.8% | 207 | (6.4) | 76-400 | (5.3) | (18.4) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.6 | 12.9 | 19.8 | 30:48 | 39-164 | (4.3) | 18-32 | 57.6% | 210 | (6.6) | 70-374 | (5.3) | (15.2) | | Defense Road Games | 26.3 | 14.3 | 23.0 | 30:51 | 44-212 | (4.8) | 19-31 | 61.4% | 207 | (6.8) | 75-419 | (5.6) | (15.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 3-9 | +0.8 | 4-8 | 5-7 | 16.0 | 9.4 | 346.7 | (4.8) | 2.1 | 28.4 | 14.0 | 388.3 | (5.7) | 2.3 | | Home Games | 2-4 | -2 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 15.3 | 9.8 | 331.0 | (4.8) | 2.2 | 24.5 | 11.2 | 334.5 | (5.2) | 2.5 | | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 314.0 | (4.1) | 2.3 | 27.3 | 10.0 | 392.7 | (5.6) | 1.0 | | Turf Games | 3-6 | +3.8 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 17.8 | 11.1 | 351.9 | (5.1) | 1.9 | 26.7 | 13.2 | 388.1 | (5.7) | 2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 16.0 | 9.4 | 18.7 | 30:32 | 35-145 | (4.2) | 20-37 | 54.2% | 201 | (5.5) | 72-347 | (4.8) | (21.7) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26 | 14.5 | 20.4 | 30:03 | 38-159 | (4.2) | 19-33 | 57.2% | 227 | (6.9) | 71-385 | (5.4) | (14.8) | | Offense Home Games | 15.3 | 9.8 | 18.0 | 30:23 | 33-138 | (4.1) | 20-36 | 55.6% | 193 | (5.4) | 69-331 | (4.8) | (21.6) | | Defense (All Games) | 28.4 | 14.0 | 20.5 | 29:28 | 37-158 | (4.2) | 18-31 | 58.6% | 230 | (7.3) | 69-388 | (5.7) | (13.7) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.7 | 14.5 | 21.1 | 30:56 | 39-161 | (4.2) | 19-33 | 56.7% | 234 | (7) | 72-394 | (5.5) | (13.8) | | Defense Home Games | 24.5 | 11.2 | 17.3 | 29:36 | 38-165 | (4.4) | 14-26 | 55.1% | 169 | (6.4) | 64-334 | (5.2) | (13.7) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DUKE 32.2, TULANE 33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/3/2015 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/12/2015 | NC CENTRAL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/19/2015 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/26/2015 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/3/2015 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/3/2015 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/12/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/19/2015 | MAINE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/3/2015 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | DUKE: Duke was able to benefit from a 2014 schedule that did not include Florida State or Clemson. The Blue Devils were favored to win nine of their 13 games, and they had two wins as a road underdog. The 2015 schedule isn't much different with the absence of Florida State, Clemson and Louisville. If new QB Thomas Sirk is as good as advertised, Duke could find itself atop the Coastal Division for the second time in three seasons. | | TULANE: There are too many offensive question marks to expect Tulane to make a huge jump from three wins. Sure, there are winnable home games versus FCS program Maine, 2-10 UConn and 2-10 Tulsa, but in-conference trips to Temple, Navy and Memphis could all spell major trouble for the Green Wave. Anything more than four wins in 2015 would be an overachievement for Tulane. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
| Last Updated: 6/13/2024 2:30:06 PM EST. |
|
|