|
|
CINCINNATI TULANE |
|
| 56.5 | 38 Final 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
309 | CINCINNATI | -270 | 310 | TULANE | +210 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-3 | -0.5 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 34.3 | 21.6 | 464.0 | (6.4) | 1.4 | 32.0 | 16.4 | 489.3 | (6.5) | 2.0 | Road Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 34.3 | 19.7 | 450.7 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 36.0 | 19.0 | 535.7 | (7.2) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 36.3 | 19.3 | 506.7 | (6.1) | 2.0 | 25.0 | 10.0 | 392.7 | (6.7) | 3.0 | Turf Games | 4-2 | +0.4 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 34.3 | 23.5 | 471.0 | (6.8) | 1.2 | 28.2 | 15.2 | 467.3 | (6.1) | 2.2 | Conference Games | 2-1 | +0.4 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 29.7 | 18.3 | 483.3 | (6.4) | 1.7 | 20.3 | 11.0 | 389.0 | (5.6) | 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.3 | 21.6 | 24.3 | 27:12 | 33-142 | (4.3) | 24-40 | 59.7% | 322 | (8.1) | 72-464 | (6.4) | (13.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.3 | 16.1 | 22.1 | 30:01 | 38-162 | (4.2) | 21-34 | 61.6% | 245 | (7.2) | 72-407 | (5.6) | (13.9) | Offense Road Games | 34.3 | 19.7 | 23.3 | 27:13 | 31-126 | (4) | 23-40 | 57.5% | 325 | (8.1) | 71-451 | (6.3) | (13.1) | Defense (All Games) | 32.0 | 16.4 | 23.9 | 32:48 | 43-214 | (5) | 20-32 | 63.1% | 276 | (8.6) | 75-489 | (6.5) | (15.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.2 | 15 | 21.1 | 30:58 | 37-169 | (4.5) | 19-33 | 56.8% | 236 | (7.2) | 70-406 | (5.8) | (14.4) | Defense Road Games | 36.0 | 19.0 | 26.3 | 32:47 | 41-271 | (6.6) | 21-33 | 64.3% | 265 | (8.1) | 74-536 | (7.2) | (14.9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-5 | -3 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 18.7 | 13.3 | 354.0 | (5) | 2.1 | 28.1 | 13.9 | 367.3 | (5.4) | 2.6 | Home Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 22.7 | 18.7 | 329.7 | (5.2) | 2.0 | 20.3 | 10.0 | 282.3 | (4.5) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 10.3 | 5.3 | 294.7 | (4.5) | 0.7 | 18.0 | 12.3 | 304.0 | (5.2) | 2.7 | Turf Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 21.0 | 16.6 | 361.8 | (5.6) | 1.6 | 26.0 | 13.0 | 380.2 | (5.6) | 2.4 | Conference Games | 1-2 | -1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 18.7 | 10.3 | 365.3 | (5.2) | 1.3 | 20.3 | 10.0 | 347.3 | (5.1) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 18.7 | 13.3 | 18.9 | 30:34 | 36-165 | (4.6) | 17-35 | 50.4% | 189 | (5.5) | 71-354 | (5) | (18.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.6 | 15.7 | 20.2 | 29:19 | 37-161 | (4.4) | 19-32 | 57.7% | 236 | (7.3) | 69-397 | (5.7) | (14.4) | Offense Home Games | 22.7 | 18.7 | 17.3 | 30:13 | 33-128 | (3.9) | 17-30 | 54.9% | 201 | (6.6) | 63-330 | (5.2) | (14.5) | Defense (All Games) | 28.1 | 13.9 | 20.1 | 29:25 | 40-165 | (4.2) | 15-28 | 55.4% | 203 | (7.3) | 67-367 | (5.4) | (13.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26 | 12.3 | 20.1 | 31:40 | 40-155 | (3.9) | 17-31 | 54.4% | 218 | (7) | 71-372 | (5.3) | (14.3) | Defense Home Games | 20.3 | 10.0 | 18.0 | 29:46 | 40-159 | (4) | 12-23 | 52.2% | 123 | (5.3) | 63-282 | (4.5) | (13.9) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CINCINNATI 32.3, TULANE 29.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/12/2014 | TOLEDO | 58-34 | W | -9 | W | 58.5 | O | 30-148 | 29-42-436 | 0 | 39-240 | 28-43-323 | 1 | 9/20/2014 | MIAMI OHIO | 31-24 | W | -30 | L | 61.5 | U | 30-99 | 25-39-271 | 2 | 44-102 | 13-26-262 | 3 | 9/27/2014 | @ OHIO ST | 28-50 | L | 17 | L | 60.5 | O | 19-70 | 21-33-352 | 0 | 65-380 | 26-36-330 | 1 | 10/4/2014 | MEMPHIS | 14-41 | L | -3 | L | 62.5 | U | 25-97 | 16-40-255 | 2 | 69-299 | 18-25-311 | 0 | 10/11/2014 | @ MIAMI | 34-55 | L | 15 | L | 66.5 | O | 29-67 | 31-60-355 | 3 | 35-335 | 17-25-286 | 1 | 10/18/2014 | @ SMU | 41-3 | W | -12.5 | W | 62 | U | 46-240 | 17-27-268 | 0 | 24-98 | 20-37-178 | 4 | 10/24/2014 | S FLORIDA | 34-17 | W | -10 | W | 60 | U | 50-273 | 27-37-317 | 3 | 22-42 | 20-33-239 | 4 | 10/31/2014 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/13/2014 | E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/29/2014 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/6/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | 21-38 | L | 7.5 | L | 55 | O | 25-96 | 17-35-231 | 3 | 57-344 | 3-8-15 | 3 | 9/13/2014 | SE LOUISIANA | 35-20 | W | 0 | W | 54 | O | 40-122 | 14-30-238 | 3 | 36-58 | 16-35-213 | 3 | 9/20/2014 | @ DUKE | 13-47 | L | 16.5 | L | 52.5 | O | 58-231 | 14-36-160 | 5 | 42-256 | 15-28-181 | 2 | 9/27/2014 | @ RUTGERS | 6-31 | L | 13.5 | L | 53.5 | U | 31-152 | 18-29-152 | 0 | 40-171 | 14-21-291 | 1 | 10/11/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 12-3 | W | -4 | W | 42 | U | 33-167 | 19-26-135 | 0 | 28-76 | 17-26-141 | 3 | 10/18/2014 | @ UCF | 13-20 | L | 17 | W | 44 | U | 36-131 | 18-42-147 | 2 | 38-94 | 12-24-139 | 4 | 10/31/2014 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/8/2014 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2014 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2014 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI: Notre Dame transfer QB Gunner Kiel is expected to run the Bearcats offense with plenty of talent at receiver, especially WR Shaq Washington (78 rec, 783 yds). Cincinnati can also rush the football effectively with RBs Hosey Williams (655 rush yds, 5.7 YPC), Ralph David Abernathy IV (518 rush yds, 5 TD) or Tion Green (412 rush yds, 7 TD). New DC Hank Hughes will keep the 4-3 defense intact that is ignited by the pass-rushing of DE Silverberry Mouhon (9.5 sacks) and relies on LB Nick Temple (79 tackles, 5.5 sacks). | | TULANE: Freshman QB Tanner Lee has the edge on QB Nick Montana (5.8 YPA, 14 TD, 10 INT), but WR Justyn Shackleford (419 rec yds) is a weak No. 1 option. Frosh RB Sherman Badie tries to replace Orleans Darkwa. CB Lorenzo Doss (7 INT, 2 TD) and S Sam Scofield (104 tackles) lead an underrated defense. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/19/2024 11:08:06 AM EST. |
|
|