|
|
TULANE TEMPLE |
|
| 44.5 | 10 Final 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
323 | TULANE | 49 | 44 | 324 | TEMPLE | -15 | -14 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | +1 | 2-2 | 2-1 | 25.0 | 13.7 | 352.7 | (5.1) | 1.5 | 35.0 | 14.5 | 438.5 | (5.8) | 2.5 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 248.0 | (3.8) | 2.0 | 65.0 | 28.0 | 571.0 | (8.7) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +2 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 31.0 | 18.3 | 380.0 | (5.4) | 1.7 | 34.3 | 15.0 | 408.0 | (5.8) | 2.7 | Grass Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 248.0 | (3.8) | 2.0 | 65.0 | 28.0 | 571.0 | (8.7) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 45.0 | 24.0 | 395.0 | (5.4) | 1.0 | 31.0 | 10.0 | 357.0 | (4.8) | 5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.0 | 13.7 | 17.2 | 28:50 | 35-118 | (3.3) | 18-34 | 54.8% | 235 | (7) | 69-353 | (5.1) | (14.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23.2 | 10.2 | 16.9 | 30:06 | 40-159 | (4) | 16-29 | 54.3% | 196 | (6.9) | 68-355 | (5.2) | (15.3) | Offense Road Games | 10.0 | 7.0 | 18.0 | 26:05 | 33-71 | (2.2) | 15-33 | 45.5% | 177 | (5.4) | 66-248 | (3.8) | (24.8) | Defense (All Games) | 35.0 | 14.5 | 23.2 | 31:10 | 40-176 | (4.4) | 21-36 | 59.0% | 263 | (7.3) | 76-438 | (5.8) | (12.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.9 | 13.1 | 18.1 | 29:25 | 38-146 | (3.8) | 16-30 | 53.2% | 180 | (5.9) | 69-326 | (4.7) | (14.2) | Defense Road Games | 65.0 | 28.0 | 28.0 | 33:55 | 56-439 | (7.8) | 8-10 | 80.0% | 132 | (13.2) | 66-571 | (8.7) | (8.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-0 | +5.8 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 30.7 | 11.0 | 348.2 | (5.1) | 1.5 | 15.5 | 9.0 | 382.2 | (5.4) | 2.2 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1.9 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 27.0 | 7.0 | 317.0 | (5) | 1.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 180.0 | (3.5) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3.8 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 32.0 | 12.3 | 358.7 | (5.1) | 1.7 | 17.3 | 8.7 | 449.7 | (5.8) | 2.7 | Grass Games | 1-0 | +1.9 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 27.0 | 7.0 | 317.0 | (5) | 1.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 180.0 | (3.5) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1.8 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 34.0 | 10.0 | 296.0 | (5.3) | 1.0 | 26.0 | 6.0 | 557.0 | (6.7) | 5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.7 | 11.0 | 17.7 | 34:21 | 40-159 | (4) | 17-28 | 60.2% | 189 | (6.7) | 68-348 | (5.1) | (11.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.8 | 14.7 | 18.6 | 31:46 | 40-173 | (4.3) | 17-29 | 58.5% | 201 | (6.8) | 70-374 | (5.4) | (13) | Offense Home Games | 27.0 | 7.0 | 15.0 | 36:15 | 43-149 | (3.5) | 16-21 | 76.2% | 168 | (8) | 64-317 | (5) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 15.5 | 9.0 | 19.7 | 25:39 | 31-119 | (3.8) | 21-40 | 52.2% | 263 | (6.6) | 71-382 | (5.4) | (24.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.4 | 17.3 | 21.8 | 29:13 | 38-160 | (4.2) | 21-37 | 56.8% | 263 | (7.1) | 75-423 | (5.6) | (16.7) | Defense Home Games | 10.0 | 10.0 | 9.0 | 23:45 | 27-77 | (2.9) | 11-25 | 44.0% | 103 | (4.1) | 52-180 | (3.5) | (18) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TULANE 30.8, TEMPLE 23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/3/2015 | DUKE | 7-37 | L | 5.5 | L | 52 | U | 23-25 | 24-42-246 | 1 | 49-206 | 29-44-324 | 2 | 9/12/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 10-65 | L | 33 | L | 59.5 | O | 33-71 | 15-33-177 | 2 | 56-439 | 8-10-132 | 1 | 9/19/2015 | MAINE | 38-7 | W | -10 | W | | - | 42-205 | 18-31-292 | 2 | 33-93 | 18-38-203 | 2 | 10/3/2015 | UCF | 45-31 | W | 1.5 | W | 44 | O | 44-170 | 17-29-225 | 1 | 22--35 | 30-52-392 | 5 | 10/10/2015 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/16/2015 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/24/2015 | @ NAVY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | PENN ST | 27-10 | W | 6 | W | 43 | U | 43-149 | 16-21-168 | 1 | 27-77 | 11-25-103 | 1 | 9/12/2015 | @ CINCINNATI | 34-26 | W | 5.5 | W | 55.5 | O | 36-215 | 13-20-81 | 1 | 31-130 | 30-52-427 | 5 | 9/19/2015 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | 25-23 | W | -13.5 | L | 55.5 | U | 37-67 | 28-49-391 | 3 | 24-45 | 29-55-393 | 2 | 10/2/2015 | @ CHARLOTTE | 37-3 | W | -20 | W | 43.5 | U | 45-206 | 11-23-116 | 1 | 44-223 | 13-27-131 | 1 | 10/10/2015 | TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/17/2015 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/22/2015 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/6/2015 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TULANE: There are too many offensive question marks to expect Tulane to make a huge jump from three wins. Sure, there are winnable home games versus FCS program Maine, 2-10 UConn and 2-10 Tulsa, but in-conference trips to Temple, Navy and Memphis could all spell major trouble for the Green Wave. Anything more than four wins in 2015 would be an overachievement for Tulane. | | TEMPLE: If defense really does win championships, Temple will win the AAC with ease. But the Owls are not the most complete team in the conference because they are so inept on offense. They also play the top four teams in the American (vs. Memphis, at Cincinnati, vs. UCF and at East Carolina) plus non-conference clashes with Penn State and Notre Dame, both at home. However, there's no reason Temple can't steal a couple of those games and wind up 6-2 in the American. With almost certain wins at UMass and Charlotte, the Owls look to be a great bet for eight victories. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 9:43:43 PM EST. |
|
|