|
|
INDIANA PURDUE |
|
| 63 | 35 Final 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
165 | INDIANA | +11.5 | Over 57 | 166 | PURDUE | +0.5 | Under 69 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-7 | -3.2 | 6-5 | 7-3 | 30.4 | 17.5 | 435.6 | (5.7) | 1.1 | 33.4 | 17.5 | 454.9 | (6) | 1.1 | Road Games | 2-3 | -0.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 31.4 | 18.4 | 443.6 | (5.8) | 1.4 | 28.6 | 16.4 | 447.8 | (5.7) | 1.4 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 415.0 | (5.3) | 2.3 | 42.7 | 22.0 | 498.7 | (7.1) | 1.3 | Grass Games | 0-2 | -2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 25.5 | 6.5 | 451.5 | (5.9) | 1.5 | 44.5 | 24.0 | 625.0 | (7.4) | 2.5 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -2.8 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 28.0 | 13.1 | 394.3 | (5.4) | 1.3 | 38.9 | 19.7 | 508.6 | (6.5) | 1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.4 | 17.5 | 22.7 | 26:32 | 33-127 | (3.8) | 27-44 | 61.8% | 309 | (7) | 77-436 | (5.7) | (14.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.8 | 12.2 | 20.3 | 29:24 | 38-153 | (4.1) | 20-33 | 61.2% | 232 | (6.9) | 71-385 | (5.4) | (15.5) | Offense Road Games | 31.4 | 18.4 | 22.4 | 27:30 | 38-160 | (4.2) | 24-39 | 61.0% | 284 | (7.3) | 77-444 | (5.8) | (14.1) | Defense (All Games) | 33.4 | 17.5 | 24.1 | 33:28 | 47-236 | (5) | 18-29 | 62.0% | 219 | (7.4) | 76-455 | (6) | (13.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.7 | 12.1 | 20.5 | 31:35 | 41-181 | (4.4) | 18-30 | 59.2% | 195 | (6.5) | 71-376 | (5.3) | (15.2) | Defense Road Games | 28.6 | 16.4 | 24.4 | 32:30 | 50-215 | (4.3) | 18-28 | 64.5% | 233 | (8.2) | 78-448 | (5.7) | (15.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | -1.5 | 5-6 | 6-4 | 27.5 | 16.0 | 391.8 | (5.3) | 1.9 | 28.5 | 13.8 | 397.3 | (5.6) | 1.9 | Home Games | 3-3 | -1 | 2-4 | 4-1 | 31.5 | 21.5 | 401.0 | (5.3) | 2.3 | 29.8 | 15.7 | 432.8 | (6) | 2.2 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.8 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 18.7 | 7.7 | 421.0 | (5.4) | 1.3 | 25.0 | 10.0 | 367.7 | (5) | 1.0 | Grass Games | 3-4 | -2 | 3-4 | 4-2 | 29.4 | 19.4 | 384.9 | (5.1) | 2.3 | 28.4 | 14.4 | 424.7 | (5.8) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -2.5 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 19.0 | 8.6 | 350.9 | (4.9) | 1.6 | 32.9 | 16.6 | 422.4 | (5.9) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.5 | 16.0 | 20.4 | 29:51 | 36-163 | (4.5) | 23-38 | 61.1% | 229 | (6) | 74-392 | (5.3) | (14.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.4 | 13.3 | 20.5 | 30:10 | 38-159 | (4.2) | 21-33 | 61.9% | 224 | (6.7) | 71-383 | (5.4) | (14.5) | Offense Home Games | 31.5 | 21.5 | 21.5 | 29:19 | 36-164 | (4.6) | 25-40 | 61.7% | 236 | (5.8) | 76-401 | (5.3) | (12.7) | Defense (All Games) | 28.5 | 13.8 | 20.4 | 30:09 | 39-181 | (4.7) | 19-33 | 56.7% | 217 | (6.6) | 71-397 | (5.6) | (14) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.5 | 12.9 | 19.3 | 30:55 | 39-168 | (4.3) | 17-29 | 57.9% | 201 | (6.8) | 69-369 | (5.4) | (14.4) | Defense Home Games | 29.8 | 15.7 | 21.7 | 30:41 | 40-221 | (5.5) | 18-32 | 56.5% | 212 | (6.6) | 72-433 | (6) | (14.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 32, PURDUE 34.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 29-44 | L | 11.5 | L | 60.5 | O | 28-159 | 22-39-266 | 1 | 58-394 | 23-35-310 | 3 | 10/6/2012 | MICHIGAN ST | 27-31 | L | 15 | W | 49 | O | 19-35 | 33-48-282 | 0 | 42-120 | 24-40-290 | 0 | 10/13/2012 | OHIO ST | 49-52 | L | 19 | W | 64 | O | 24-129 | 28-54-352 | 0 | 54-353 | 14-25-225 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | @ NAVY | 30-31 | L | 2.5 | W | 63 | U | 40-173 | 25-38-244 | 2 | 57-257 | 8-13-96 | 0 | 10/27/2012 | @ ILLINOIS | 31-17 | W | 2.5 | W | 58.5 | U | 42-121 | 14-22-171 | 1 | 55-196 | 17-27-176 | 2 | 11/3/2012 | IOWA | 24-21 | W | -2 | W | 54 | U | 30-67 | 31-49-406 | 2 | 30-96 | 21-34-249 | 2 | 11/10/2012 | WISCONSIN | 14-62 | L | 7.5 | L | 55.5 | O | 23-61 | 25-47-233 | 3 | 64-564 | 4-7-41 | 0 | 11/17/2012 | @ PENN ST | 22-45 | L | 16.5 | L | 56 | O | 26-24 | 33-59-454 | 2 | 44-151 | 22-32-395 | 2 | 11/24/2012 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | MARSHALL | 51-41 | W | -17 | L | 61.5 | O | 53-149 | 27-37-294 | 1 | 23-95 | 45-68-439 | 4 | 10/6/2012 | MICHIGAN | 13-44 | L | 3 | L | 55 | O | 26-56 | 23-35-157 | 4 | 54-304 | 8-16-105 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | WISCONSIN | 14-38 | L | 1.5 | L | 49.5 | O | 28-128 | 11-31-124 | 1 | 57-467 | 12-21-178 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | @ OHIO ST | 22-29 | L | 17 | W | 58 | U | 39-117 | 19-30-230 | 1 | 36-152 | 15-32-190 | 4 | 10/27/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 28-44 | L | -2 | L | 50 | O | 34-183 | 21-43-198 | 1 | 41-212 | 15-22-246 | 0 | 11/3/2012 | PENN ST | 9-34 | L | 3.5 | L | 49.5 | U | 26-87 | 33-62-288 | 1 | 38-185 | 22-37-321 | 0 | 11/10/2012 | @ IOWA | 27-24 | W | 5 | W | 48.5 | O | 44-211 | 26-35-279 | 3 | 31-74 | 19-36-190 | 0 | 11/17/2012 | @ ILLINOIS | 20-17 | W | -6.5 | L | 49 | U | 37-207 | 19-28-191 | 0 | 39-173 | 22-38-160 | 3 | 11/24/2012 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| INDIANA: The good news for the Hoosiers is that they can't get any worse than they were last year. Indiana won only one game in 2011 (38-21 over FCS school South Carolina State), and returns all four starters from its defensive line as well as three defensive backs. Head coach Kevin Wilson has a decent group of running backs to work with, led by junior Stephen Houston (802 rush yds, 8 TD), but they are inexperienced at the quarterback position. The Hoosiers will need either Tre Roberson (3 TD, 6 INT) or Edward Wright-Baker (4 TD, 4 INT) to develop in order to have their answer under center. | | PURDUE: Purdue is yet another Big Ten team with a quarterback controversy. QB Robert Marve (633 pass yds, 4 TD, 5 INT) will return to take snaps away from another talented QB in Caleb TerBush (1,905 pass yds, 13 TD, 6 INT). Fortunately for Purdue, both of these quarterbacks are very capable. If they can sure up an iffy offensive line, their solid corps of running backs and receivers could make the Boilermakers one of the tougher offenses to stop. On the other side of the ball, Kawann Short (6.5 sacks, 54 tackles, 17 TFL) is trying to solidify himself as the best defensive end in college football. In the secondary, the team is losing some players, but also returns some nice talent at cornerback. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 6:55:58 AM EST. |
|
|