|
|
BOWLING GREEN OHIO U |
|
| 66.5 | 14 Final 49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
375 | BOWLING GREEN | 69.5 | 69.5 | 376 | OHIO U | -16.5 | -16.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-6 | -2 | 2-5 | 5-1 | 27.3 | 16.3 | 386.4 | (5.3) | 2.0 | 47.6 | 21.6 | 506.7 | (7) | 1.3 | Road Games | 0-3 | 0 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 25.7 | 16.0 | 421.0 | (5.3) | 2.3 | 57.7 | 29.7 | 502.7 | (7.4) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 29.3 | 17.3 | 461.7 | (6.7) | 2.7 | 52.3 | 19.7 | 524.0 | (7) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 1-5 | -2 | 2-4 | 4-1 | 29.0 | 17.3 | 385.3 | (5.4) | 1.8 | 45.0 | 20.5 | 502.5 | (6.7) | 1.5 | Conference Games | 0-3 | -2 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 31.3 | 15.0 | 459.0 | (6.8) | 2.0 | 44.0 | 18.3 | 482.7 | (6.1) | 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.3 | 16.3 | 21.9 | 29:35 | 34-108 | (3.1) | 24-39 | 61.3% | 279 | (7.1) | 73-386 | (5.3) | (14.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29 | 16.3 | 20.2 | 29:26 | 37-141 | (3.8) | 19-32 | 60.0% | 233 | (7.3) | 69-374 | (5.4) | (12.9) | Offense Road Games | 25.7 | 16.0 | 22.0 | 32:42 | 39-130 | (3.3) | 23-41 | 56.6% | 291 | (7.1) | 80-421 | (5.3) | (16.4) | Defense (All Games) | 47.6 | 21.6 | 24.3 | 30:25 | 51-325 | (6.4) | 11-22 | 51.6% | 182 | (8.3) | 72-507 | (7) | (10.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 34.7 | 17.2 | 21.1 | 31:32 | 45-234 | (5.2) | 14-25 | 55.7% | 185 | (7.5) | 70-418 | (6) | (12.1) | Defense Road Games | 57.7 | 29.7 | 24.3 | 27:18 | 45-291 | (6.5) | 11-23 | 48.5% | 212 | (9.4) | 68-503 | (7.4) | (8.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | -1 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 34.2 | 18.5 | 433.0 | (6.6) | 2.0 | 33.8 | 20.2 | 490.7 | (6.8) | 2.0 | Home Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 48.0 | 26.0 | 543.5 | (7.3) | 0.5 | 37.0 | 25.0 | 548.0 | (7) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 35.3 | 16.3 | 466.3 | (7.4) | 2.7 | 30.7 | 18.0 | 441.0 | (6.2) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 3-3 | -1 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 34.2 | 18.5 | 433.0 | (6.6) | 2.0 | 33.8 | 20.2 | 490.7 | (6.8) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 24.0 | 7.0 | 367.5 | (6.5) | 3.5 | 25.0 | 13.0 | 436.0 | (5.8) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.2 | 18.5 | 23.0 | 32:20 | 38-178 | (4.7) | 17-28 | 62.0% | 255 | (9.2) | 66-433 | (6.6) | (12.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.6 | 15.1 | 20.9 | 30:24 | 41-182 | (4.5) | 17-31 | 56.7% | 222 | (7.2) | 71-404 | (5.7) | (13.2) | Offense Home Games | 48.0 | 26.0 | 28.0 | 33:53 | 42-270 | (6.4) | 21-32 | 64.6% | 273 | (8.4) | 74-543 | (7.3) | (11.3) | Defense (All Games) | 33.8 | 20.2 | 24.0 | 27:24 | 35-163 | (4.7) | 24-37 | 64.4% | 327 | (8.7) | 72-491 | (6.8) | (14.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.8 | 14.9 | 21.4 | 30:31 | 41-169 | (4.1) | 19-33 | 58.4% | 234 | (7.2) | 74-403 | (5.5) | (14.5) | Defense Home Games | 37.0 | 25.0 | 24.5 | 25:22 | 30-101 | (3.3) | 28-48 | 59.4% | 447 | (9.3) | 78-548 | (7) | (14.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BOWLING GREEN 30.1, OHIO U 22.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | @ OREGON | 24-58 | L | 32.5 | L | 69.5 | O | 50-136 | 22-39-253 | 3 | 42-212 | 11-26-292 | 3 | 9/8/2018 | MARYLAND | 14-45 | L | 13 | L | 65.5 | U | 28-15 | 17-27-143 | 1 | 53-444 | 8-16-121 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | E KENTUCKY | 42-35 | W | -15 | L | | - | 40-130 | 28-40-258 | 1 | 60-389 | 6-17-109 | 3 | 9/22/2018 | MIAMI OHIO | 23-38 | L | 6.5 | L | 55 | O | 34-85 | 33-50-300 | 1 | 52-289 | 10-15-119 | 0 | 9/29/2018 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 17-63 | L | 28 | L | 65 | O | 38-63 | 29-49-330 | 3 | 49-372 | 5-7-160 | 0 | 10/6/2018 | @ TOLEDO | 36-52 | L | 22.5 | W | 71 | O | 29-192 | 18-34-289 | 1 | 44-288 | 17-35-184 | 0 | 10/13/2018 | W MICHIGAN | 35-42 | L | 14.5 | W | 68.5 | O | 21-132 | 21-35-379 | 4 | 54-282 | 22-37-286 | 2 | 10/20/2018 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/30/2018 | KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | @ AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | HOWARD | 38-32 | W | -30.5 | L | | - | 40-146 | 19-33-277 | 0 | 39-161 | 27-53-484 | 4 | 9/15/2018 | *VIRGINIA | 31-45 | L | 4 | L | 55.5 | O | 30-118 | 16-31-246 | 2 | 31-173 | 25-30-379 | 3 | 9/22/2018 | @ CINCINNATI | 30-34 | L | 7 | W | 56 | O | 45-234 | 12-27-178 | 2 | 34-150 | 19-31-274 | 1 | 9/29/2018 | MASSACHUSETTS | 58-42 | W | -10.5 | W | 69 | O | 44-394 | 23-32-270 | 1 | 22-41 | 30-43-410 | 1 | 10/6/2018 | @ KENT ST | 27-26 | W | -11.5 | L | 70 | U | 38-130 | 18-20-284 | 4 | 36-201 | 27-35-271 | 3 | 10/13/2018 | @ N ILLINOIS | 21-24 | L | 5.5 | W | 52 | U | 32-46 | 15-23-275 | 3 | 46-255 | 17-33-145 | 0 | 10/20/2018 | BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/25/2018 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/1/2018 | @ W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2018 | @ MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/14/2018 | BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| BOWLING GREEN: The Falcons brought in a new defensive coordinator in Carl Pelini, who inherits a bad defense but a good number of experienced players. It's entirely possible that he breathes life into the unit. As a guy that loves coaching defensive linemen, he'll love having end David Konowalski on his side. On offense, quarterback Jarret Doege and wide receiver Scott Miller should revitalize a passing game that hasn't been there in recent seasons. And running back Andrew Clair will look to improve on what was an impressive freshman campaign. The Falcons aren't quite there yet, but they could be pretty good soon. | | OHIO U: Last season, quarterback Nathan Rourke threw for 17 touchdowns and only seven picks while adding 912 yards and 21 touchdowns on the ground. He's arguably the best dual-threat QB this conference has to offer, and he's joined by a group of talented rushers in the backfield. The fact that they all run behind an experienced O-line only makes the Ohio offense more dangerous. Defensively, the Bobcats have to replace most of their front seven. If they can competently do that, there is little in the way of them taking the top spot in the East, and they'll definitely have a shot at a conference title. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 9/20/2024 9:57:52 PM EST. |
|
|