|
|
E MICHIGAN N ILLINOIS |
|
| 47 | 27 Final 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
107 | E MICHIGAN | +220 | 108 | N ILLINOIS | -300 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-5 | -2.3 | 5-2 | 1-6 | 19.9 | 10.6 | 368.3 | (5.3) | 1.9 | 19.9 | 9.7 | 351.6 | (5.1) | 1.4 | Road Games | 1-3 | -1.1 | 4-0 | 1-3 | 19.5 | 11.0 | 344.0 | (5.3) | 1.7 | 21.2 | 10.2 | 346.5 | (5.1) | 0.7 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 19.7 | 9.0 | 383.0 | (5.8) | 2.0 | 22.7 | 11.3 | 418.0 | (5.9) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 2-5 | -2.3 | 5-2 | 1-6 | 19.9 | 10.6 | 368.3 | (5.3) | 1.9 | 19.9 | 9.7 | 351.6 | (5.1) | 1.4 | Conference Games | 0-3 | -3.2 | 1-2 | 0-3 | 17.3 | 6.3 | 378.3 | (5.2) | 2.0 | 22.3 | 10.0 | 404.7 | (5.4) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 19.9 | 10.6 | 20.3 | 28:53 | 31-94 | (3) | 24-39 | 61.1% | 274 | (7) | 70-368 | (5.3) | (18.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.9 | 12.9 | 19.8 | 29:50 | 35-153 | (4.4) | 20-33 | 59.2% | 236 | (7.1) | 68-389 | (5.7) | (15) | Offense Road Games | 19.5 | 11.0 | 20.2 | 26:52 | 28-84 | (3) | 22-38 | 58.9% | 260 | (6.9) | 65-344 | (5.3) | (17.6) | Defense (All Games) | 19.9 | 9.7 | 19.0 | 31:07 | 42-184 | (4.4) | 15-27 | 55.7% | 168 | (6.1) | 69-352 | (5.1) | (17.7) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.7 | 13.8 | 19.9 | 31:09 | 44-221 | (5) | 14-24 | 56.2% | 164 | (6.8) | 68-386 | (5.7) | (13) | Defense Road Games | 21.2 | 10.2 | 19.0 | 33:08 | 42-181 | (4.3) | 14-26 | 55.8% | 165 | (6.4) | 68-346 | (5.1) | (16.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-2 | +4.2 | 5-2 | 2-5 | 27.6 | 18.3 | 398.9 | (5.1) | 2.1 | 16.7 | 10.0 | 293.4 | (4.1) | 2.4 | Home Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 27.3 | 18.3 | 377.3 | (5) | 2.3 | 12.0 | 6.3 | 219.0 | (2.9) | 2.7 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 28.7 | 19.7 | 428.0 | (5.2) | 2.0 | 11.0 | 7.7 | 293.7 | (4.7) | 3.3 | Turf Games | 5-1 | +5.2 | 4-2 | 1-5 | 27.5 | 19.0 | 393.8 | (5.2) | 1.8 | 13.8 | 6.5 | 298.5 | (4.1) | 2.8 | Conference Games | 3-0 | +2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 28.7 | 19.7 | 428.0 | (5.2) | 2.0 | 11.0 | 7.7 | 293.7 | (4.7) | 3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.6 | 18.3 | 21.7 | 30:09 | 46-192 | (4.2) | 19-32 | 59.4% | 207 | (6.5) | 78-399 | (5.1) | (14.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.6 | 18.4 | 22 | 30:55 | 42-210 | (4.9) | 18-30 | 60.5% | 218 | (7.3) | 72-428 | (5.9) | (14) | Offense Home Games | 27.3 | 18.3 | 19.7 | 28:39 | 44-182 | (4.1) | 18-32 | 55.2% | 195 | (6.1) | 76-377 | (5) | (13.8) | Defense (All Games) | 16.7 | 10.0 | 15.3 | 29:51 | 40-108 | (2.7) | 16-31 | 53.5% | 186 | (6.1) | 71-293 | (4.1) | (17.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 20.3 | 10.5 | 17.7 | 30:01 | 40-146 | (3.6) | 15-30 | 52.1% | 188 | (6.4) | 70-334 | (4.8) | (16.5) | Defense Home Games | 12.0 | 6.3 | 15.3 | 31:21 | 46-103 | (2.2) | 15-30 | 50.5% | 116 | (3.8) | 76-219 | (2.9) | (18.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: E MICHIGAN 29.3, N ILLINOIS 22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2017 | CHARLOTTE | 24-7 | W | -14 | W | 59 | U | 41-126 | 22-31-267 | 2 | 35-166 | 12-29-114 | 3 | 9/9/2017 | @ RUTGERS | 16-13 | W | 6 | W | 51 | U | 35-114 | 19-37-260 | 1 | 30-128 | 17-38-198 | 2 | 9/23/2017 | OHIO U | 20-27 | L | -1.5 | L | 54.5 | U | 27-45 | 29-49-305 | 1 | 47-176 | 19-32-197 | 2 | 9/30/2017 | @ KENTUCKY | 20-24 | L | 14 | W | 50.5 | U | 27-13 | 27-47-299 | 3 | 37-53 | 18-27-175 | 1 | 10/7/2017 | @ TOLEDO | 15-20 | L | 12.5 | W | 60 | U | 23-73 | 24-40-253 | 2 | 42-130 | 23-34-289 | 0 | 10/14/2017 | @ ARMY | 27-28 | L | 4 | W | 50 | O | 26-135 | 19-27-229 | 1 | 61-413 | 0-5-0 | 0 | 10/21/2017 | W MICHIGAN | 17-20 | L | 2.5 | L | 52.5 | U | 37-151 | 28-44-308 | 3 | 42-220 | 18-27-202 | 2 | 10/26/2017 | @ N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2017 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/8/2017 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2017 | @ MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/21/2017 | BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2017 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 20-23 | L | 3.5 | W | 46.5 | U | 35-164 | 16-39-203 | 1 | 50-148 | 26-42-191 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | E ILLINOIS | 38-10 | W | -14.5 | W | 54.5 | U | 47-230 | 24-35-269 | 3 | 45-60 | 14-32-127 | 3 | 9/16/2017 | @ NEBRASKA | 21-17 | W | 10.5 | W | 56 | U | 31-85 | 15-23-128 | 1 | 36-85 | 25-47-299 | 3 | 9/30/2017 | @ SAN DIEGO ST | 28-34 | L | 9.5 | W | 46 | O | 46-160 | 24-40-269 | 4 | 36-127 | 10-20-136 | 0 | 10/7/2017 | KENT ST | 24-3 | W | -22.5 | L | 44 | U | 50-152 | 13-22-114 | 3 | 43-102 | 6-17-29 | 4 | 10/14/2017 | @ BUFFALO | 14-13 | W | -8 | L | 50 | U | 56-217 | 20-31-224 | 2 | 27-39 | 21-34-344 | 1 | 10/21/2017 | @ BOWLING GREEN | 48-17 | W | -15.5 | W | 57 | O | 55-338 | 21-34-239 | 1 | 44-192 | 13-23-175 | 5 | 10/26/2017 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2017 | @ TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/9/2017 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2017 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2017 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| E MICHIGAN: The Eagles have one of the better QBs in the conference in Brogan Roback, but the team will need to find a way to keep him upright. EMU
had a great O-Line last year, but this is a young unit this time around. On D, this team can stop the run but needs to be a bit better all around. | | N ILLINOIS: Defensively, NIU is going to be young up front. That means the team could struggle to stop the run. The Huskies are, however, good in the
secondary, which will help against pass-happy MAC teams. Offensively, the Huskies will go as far as the rushing attack takes them. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/27/2024 4:06:49 AM EST. |
|
|