|
|
N ILLINOIS First Half Results NEBRASKA |
|
| 28 | 14 Final 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
139 | N ILLINOIS | 28 | 140 | NEBRASKA | -6 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 29.0 | 20.5 | 433.0 | (5.6) | 2.0 | 16.5 | 8.0 | 263.0 | (3.1) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 29.0 | 20.5 | 433.0 | (5.6) | 2.0 | 16.5 | 8.0 | 263.0 | (3.1) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 1-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 29.0 | 20.5 | 433.0 | (5.6) | 2.0 | 16.5 | 8.0 | 263.0 | (3.1) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 29.0 | 20.5 | 22.0 | 27:58 | 41-197 | (4.8) | 20-37 | 54.1% | 236 | (6.4) | 78-433 | (5.6) | (14.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.5 | 23.2 | 21.2 | 30:41 | 45-196 | (4.3) | 19-32 | 60.2% | 223 | (7) | 77-418 | (5.4) | (12.9) | Defense (All Games) | 16.5 | 8.0 | 18.5 | 32:01 | 47-104 | (2.2) | 20-37 | 54.1% | 159 | (4.3) | 84-263 | (3.1) | (15.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 13.2 | 6.5 | 18 | 30:19 | 45-102 | (2.3) | 18-37 | 49.0% | 152 | (4.1) | 82-254 | (3.1) | (19.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 39.0 | 20.5 | 412.0 | (5.9) | 2.0 | 39.0 | 34.0 | 531.5 | (6.4) | 2.0 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 43.0 | 27.0 | 463.0 | (6.6) | 0.0 | 36.0 | 26.0 | 497.0 | (5.6) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 39.0 | 20.5 | 412.0 | (5.9) | 2.0 | 39.0 | 34.0 | 531.5 | (6.4) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 39.0 | 20.5 | 412.0 | (5.9) | 2.0 | 39.0 | 34.0 | 531.5 | (6.4) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 39.0 | 20.5 | 22.0 | 30:50 | 33-167 | (5) | 19-36 | 52.1% | 245 | (6.7) | 70-412 | (5.9) | (10.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 35.5 | 22.2 | 23.5 | 32:56 | 36-164 | (4.6) | 20-38 | 53.6% | 248 | (6.5) | 74-413 | (5.6) | (11.6) | Offense Home Games | 43.0 | 27.0 | 25.0 | 32:18 | 38-225 | (5.9) | 19-32 | 59.4% | 238 | (7.4) | 70-463 | (6.6) | (10.8) | Defense (All Games) | 39.0 | 34.0 | 27.0 | 29:10 | 32-141 | (4.4) | 35-50 | 70.3% | 390 | (7.7) | 83-531 | (6.4) | (13.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 47.8 | 34 | 30.8 | 28:04 | 34-178 | (5.2) | 35-49 | 71.4% | 388 | (7.9) | 84-566 | (6.8) | (11.8) | Defense Home Games | 36.0 | 26.0 | 32.0 | 27:42 | 21-82 | (3.9) | 46-68 | 67.6% | 415 | (6.1) | 89-497 | (5.6) | (13.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: N ILLINOIS 12.5, NEBRASKA 38.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2017 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 20-23 | L | 3.5 | W | 46.5 | U | 35-164 | 16-39-203 | 1 | 50-148 | 26-42-191 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | E ILLINOIS | 38-10 | W | -14.5 | W | 54.5 | U | 47-230 | 24-35-269 | 3 | 45-60 | 14-32-127 | 3 | 9/16/2017 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | @ SAN DIEGO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | ARKANSAS ST | 43-36 | W | -14.5 | L | 51.5 | O | 38-225 | 19-32-238 | 0 | 21-82 | 46-68-415 | 2 | 9/9/2017 | @ OREGON | 35-42 | L | 14 | W | 69.5 | O | 29-109 | 19-41-252 | 4 | 44-201 | 25-33-365 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/23/2017 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2017 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| N ILLINOIS: Defensively, NIU is going to be young up front. That means the team could struggle to stop the run. The Huskies are, however, good in the
secondary, which will help against pass-happy MAC teams. Offensively, the Huskies will go as far as the rushing attack takes them. | | NEBRASKA: The Cornhuskers no longer have the mobility of Tommy Armstrong under center, but transfer Tanner Lee is a good pocket passer. The defense should be a strength, so NU's success relies on the ability to score points. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 8:37:38 AM EST. |
|
|