|
|
SYRACUSE First Half Results NC STATE |
|
| 31.5 | 7 Final 26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
121 | SYRACUSE | 31.5 | 122 | NC STATE | -8 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | -2.4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 35.0 | 17.7 | 464.2 | (5.4) | 2.0 | 22.2 | 10.0 | 331.5 | (5) | 2.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 26.0 | 3.0 | 384.0 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 35.0 | 14.0 | 414.0 | (6.8) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 30.0 | 13.3 | 423.7 | (5) | 2.0 | 27.3 | 13.3 | 386.3 | (5.5) | 2.3 | Grass Games | 0-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 26.0 | 3.0 | 384.0 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 35.0 | 14.0 | 414.0 | (6.8) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 35.0 | 17.7 | 25.2 | 31:09 | 40-164 | (4.1) | 29-46 | 62.9% | 300 | (6.5) | 87-464 | (5.4) | (13.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.1 | 16.8 | 22.3 | 30:18 | 37-137 | (3.7) | 24-39 | 62.0% | 280 | (7.2) | 76-417 | (5.5) | (13.4) | Offense Road Games | 26.0 | 3.0 | 24.0 | 29:52 | 27-76 | (2.8) | 34-55 | 61.8% | 308 | (5.6) | 82-384 | (4.7) | (14.8) | Defense (All Games) | 22.2 | 10.0 | 17.0 | 28:51 | 34-101 | (3) | 18-33 | 53.8% | 230 | (7) | 67-331 | (5) | (14.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 19.4 | 10.2 | 17.1 | 30:41 | 35-127 | (3.6) | 18-32 | 55.9% | 213 | (6.6) | 67-340 | (5.1) | (17.5) | Defense Road Games | 35.0 | 14.0 | 18.0 | 30:08 | 38-151 | (4) | 14-23 | 60.9% | 263 | (11.4) | 61-414 | (6.8) | (11.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-1 | -0.1 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 35.2 | 22.2 | 461.0 | (6) | 0.5 | 23.0 | 16.0 | 352.0 | (5.7) | 1.7 | Home Games | 2-0 | 0 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 43.0 | 25.5 | 487.5 | (7.1) | 0.0 | 18.0 | 16.5 | 390.0 | (5.8) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3.2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 37.7 | 22.7 | 446.7 | (6.4) | 0.0 | 19.0 | 14.3 | 387.3 | (5.8) | 2.0 | Grass Games | 3-1 | -0.1 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 35.2 | 22.2 | 461.0 | (6) | 0.5 | 23.0 | 16.0 | 352.0 | (5.7) | 1.7 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +3.2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 27.0 | 17.0 | 365.0 | (5.2) | 0.0 | 21.0 | 10.0 | 382.0 | (5.9) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 35.2 | 22.2 | 24.5 | 32:34 | 36-146 | (4.1) | 30-41 | 74.2% | 315 | (7.7) | 77-461 | (6) | (13.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.9 | 16.6 | 21.1 | 32:35 | 39-164 | (4.2) | 21-32 | 66.9% | 238 | (7.5) | 70-402 | (5.7) | (13.9) | Offense Home Games | 43.0 | 25.5 | 24.0 | 30:06 | 36-193 | (5.4) | 26-33 | 80.3% | 294 | (8.9) | 69-487 | (7.1) | (11.3) | Defense (All Games) | 23.0 | 16.0 | 15.2 | 27:26 | 30-92 | (3.1) | 19-32 | 58.5% | 260 | (8) | 62-352 | (5.7) | (15.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 19.5 | 11.9 | 16.7 | 28:25 | 32-103 | (3.2) | 19-31 | 59.4% | 238 | (7.5) | 64-340 | (5.3) | (17.5) | Defense Home Games | 18.0 | 16.5 | 17.0 | 29:53 | 36-117 | (3.2) | 18-31 | 59.7% | 273 | (8.8) | 67-390 | (5.8) | (21.7) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: SYRACUSE 23.2, NC STATE 25.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2017 | C CONN ST | 50-7 | W | -46 | L | 70 | U | 41-155 | 37-52-431 | 2 | 30-54 | 12-27-113 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | MIDDLE TENN ST | 23-30 | L | -8 | L | 72.5 | U | 49-126 | 27-44-182 | 2 | 33-94 | 22-36-269 | 3 | 9/16/2017 | C MICHIGAN | 41-17 | W | -7.5 | W | 66.5 | U | 44-300 | 19-35-279 | 3 | 34-105 | 23-46-277 | 3 | 9/23/2017 | @ LSU | 26-35 | L | 21.5 | W | 57 | O | 27-76 | 34-55-308 | 1 | 38-151 | 14-23-263 | 1 | 9/30/2017 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2017 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | *S CAROLINA | 28-35 | L | -8 | L | 49.5 | O | 35-89 | 45-64-415 | 2 | 21-31 | 17-29-215 | 1 | 9/9/2017 | MARSHALL | 37-20 | W | -21 | L | 55 | O | 33-144 | 29-36-341 | 0 | 25-101 | 26-43-350 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | FURMAN | 49-16 | W | -36.5 | L | 58.5 | O | 39-242 | 24-30-248 | 0 | 47-133 | 11-19-196 | 3 | 9/23/2017 | @ FLORIDA ST | 27-21 | W | 11 | W | 51 | U | 37-110 | 23-33-255 | 0 | 26-104 | 22-39-278 | 1 | 9/30/2017 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/5/2017 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/28/2017 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| SYRACUSE: With head coach Dino Babers around, the Orange are not going to have any problems scoring. They were, however, one of the worst defensive teams in the country last season. That's not likely to change much either | | NC STATE: NC State should be ready for a big improvement this season. QB Ryan Finley has another year of experience in the system and should lead a very solid offense. The Wolfpack also happen to have an elite D-Line. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 12:00:27 PM EST. |
|
|