|
|
MEMPHIS MISSOURI |
|
| 70.5 | 33 Final 65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
397 | MEMPHIS | 74 | 71 | 398 | MISSOURI | -7 | -9.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-3 | -11.2 | 4-3 | 2-4 | 43.9 | 28.6 | 539.0 | (8.1) | 1.1 | 25.4 | 12.6 | 364.7 | (5.2) | 1.6 | Road Games | 0-2 | -10.2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 22.5 | 7.0 | 327.5 | (6.5) | 2.0 | 31.0 | 13.0 | 406.0 | (5.2) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -8.5 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 36.3 | 26.0 | 467.0 | (7.3) | 0.7 | 28.3 | 16.0 | 428.0 | (5.9) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 4-3 | -11.2 | 4-3 | 2-4 | 43.9 | 28.6 | 539.0 | (8.1) | 1.1 | 25.4 | 12.6 | 364.7 | (5.2) | 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 43.9 | 28.6 | 24.3 | 26:43 | 38-275 | (7.3) | 19-28 | 66.3% | 264 | (9.3) | 66-539 | (8.1) | (12.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 39.6 | 25.5 | 24.4 | 30:15 | 41-237 | (5.7) | 21-31 | 66.0% | 274 | (8.8) | 72-511 | (7.1) | (12.9) | Offense Road Games | 22.5 | 7.0 | 13.5 | 18:47 | 22-132 | (5.9) | 14-27 | 52.7% | 195 | (7.1) | 50-327 | (6.5) | (14.6) | Defense (All Games) | 25.4 | 12.6 | 18.3 | 32:60 | 43-171 | (4) | 16-28 | 59.6% | 193 | (7) | 70-365 | (5.2) | (14.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26.1 | 12.7 | 18.7 | 30:46 | 40-178 | (4.4) | 15-27 | 56.6% | 188 | (7) | 67-366 | (5.4) | (14) | Defense Road Games | 31.0 | 13.0 | 21.0 | 40:11 | 64-291 | (4.5) | 8-14 | 60.7% | 115 | (8.2) | 78-406 | (5.2) | (13.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | -0.1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 34.2 | 20.2 | 477.0 | (5.9) | 1.7 | 30.5 | 15.8 | 420.8 | (6.2) | 1.0 | Home Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 40.0 | 20.3 | 517.3 | (6.1) | 1.3 | 23.3 | 9.0 | 323.3 | (5.4) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -2 | 0-2 | 2-1 | 24.7 | 13.3 | 365.0 | (4.8) | 2.7 | 39.7 | 21.3 | 462.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 40.0 | 20.3 | 517.3 | (6.1) | 1.3 | 23.3 | 9.0 | 323.3 | (5.4) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 34.2 | 20.2 | 25.3 | 30:58 | 42-188 | (4.4) | 22-39 | 58.2% | 289 | (7.5) | 81-477 | (5.9) | (14) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27 | 14.5 | 20.3 | 30:08 | 36-141 | (3.9) | 20-33 | 60.5% | 245 | (7.3) | 70-386 | (5.5) | (14.3) | Offense Home Games | 40.0 | 20.3 | 28.3 | 31:54 | 42-180 | (4.2) | 26-42 | 62.2% | 338 | (8) | 85-517 | (6.1) | (12.9) | Defense (All Games) | 30.5 | 15.8 | 18.7 | 29:02 | 34-120 | (3.5) | 20-33 | 60.2% | 301 | (9) | 68-421 | (6.2) | (13.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 32.6 | 18.8 | 21.6 | 30:52 | 36-169 | (4.7) | 20-32 | 62.7% | 263 | (8.1) | 69-432 | (6.3) | (13.3) | Defense Home Games | 23.3 | 9.0 | 15.3 | 28:06 | 33-122 | (3.7) | 14-27 | 53.1% | 201 | (7.4) | 60-323 | (5.4) | (13.9) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MEMPHIS 22.9, MISSOURI 39.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | MERCER | 66-14 | W | -31 | W | | - | 47-324 | 28-39-428 | 1 | 24-60 | 14-27-114 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | @ NAVY | 21-22 | L | -6.5 | L | 67 | U | 24-233 | 15-25-145 | 4 | 73-264 | 4-6-52 | 1 | 9/14/2018 | GEORGIA ST | 59-22 | W | -29 | W | 63.5 | O | 35-410 | 19-27-269 | 1 | 43-173 | 19-34-139 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | S ALABAMA | 52-35 | W | -31.5 | L | 66 | O | 46-271 | 22-30-292 | 0 | 36-107 | 24-32-360 | 2 | 9/28/2018 | @ TULANE | 24-40 | L | -14.5 | L | 66 | U | 21-31 | 14-30-246 | 0 | 56-318 | 13-22-178 | 0 | 10/6/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 55-14 | W | -35.5 | W | 77.5 | U | 40-378 | 17-19-256 | 0 | 30-112 | 24-43-215 | 4 | 10/13/2018 | UCF | 30-31 | L | 4.5 | W | 80 | U | 52-281 | 17-29-209 | 2 | 37-165 | 17-29-296 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/16/2018 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | TENN-MARTIN | 51-14 | W | -35.5 | W | | - | 44-164 | 23-34-394 | 0 | 29-94 | 17-30-183 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | WYOMING | 40-13 | W | -19.5 | W | 52.5 | O | 46-203 | 33-45-398 | 1 | 30-88 | 13-28-160 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | @ PURDUE | 40-37 | W | -5.5 | L | 67 | O | 46-233 | 26-43-375 | 1 | 16-42 | 39-55-572 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | GEORGIA | 29-43 | L | 14 | T | 68 | O | 37-172 | 23-48-221 | 3 | 40-185 | 13-23-260 | 1 | 10/6/2018 | @ S CAROLINA | 35-37 | L | 1 | L | 62.5 | O | 46-286 | 17-36-204 | 2 | 47-128 | 20-35-249 | 1 | 10/13/2018 | @ ALABAMA | 10-39 | L | 28 | L | 72 | U | 35-70 | 13-26-142 | 3 | 45-184 | 19-30-380 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2018 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | @ FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MEMPHIS: Riley Ferguson and Anthony Miller are no longer around, but it's pretty clear that head coach Mike Norvell's spread offense can adapt to any player who's running the show. The Tigers are going to put up points, especially considering talented running backs Darrell Henderson and Patrick Taylor return to make plays behind what could be the conference's best O-line. On the other side of the ball, Memphis has some talent in its secondary. The Tigers aren't going to shut anybody out, but they can create turnovers and aren't going to completely let their offense down. | | MISSOURI: Quarterback Drew Lock returns to Columbia for his senior season, and with his entire offensive line joining him, look for more gaudy statistics (he's thrown for 8,695 yards and 17 TDs so far) from the strong-armed NFL prospect. But it is what surrounds Lock, and new offensive coordinator Derek Dooley, that will determine the Tigers' conference fate. Speedy wide receiver Emanuel Hall is a game-breaker if healthy. Then there's the defense, which is solid but with concerns at end and safety. Mizzou has a brutal three-game stretch starting in late September'it hosts Georgia, then travels to South Carolina and Alabama'but the remainder of its schedule is manageable. Their QB play alone makes the Tigers an intriguing betting option. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 10:47:33 PM EST. |
|
|