|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
205 | SMU | +27 | Over 66 | 206 | MEMPHIS | -15 | Under 78 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-9 | -8.6 | 5-6 | 8-3 | 30.3 | 17.3 | 408.8 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 44.1 | 20.4 | 503.9 | (7) | 1.2 | Road Games | 0-4 | -2 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 23.2 | 13.0 | 385.0 | (5.3) | 2.2 | 49.5 | 25.2 | 503.2 | (7.3) | 0.7 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 34.3 | 19.7 | 394.3 | (6.2) | 1.3 | 45.3 | 18.7 | 449.3 | (6.7) | 0.0 | Turf Games | 2-7 | -7.6 | 4-5 | 7-2 | 31.3 | 18.4 | 402.7 | (5.7) | 1.8 | 43.4 | 19.9 | 496.8 | (6.8) | 1.2 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -4 | 2-5 | 5-2 | 28.4 | 18.7 | 383.1 | (5.5) | 1.9 | 44.6 | 20.7 | 447.3 | (6.3) | 0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.3 | 17.3 | 21.5 | 31:08 | 41-177 | (4.3) | 18-31 | 57.3% | 232 | (7.4) | 73-409 | (5.6) | (13.5) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.8 | 14.7 | 21.5 | 31:42 | 41-176 | (4.3) | 19-33 | 58.5% | 244 | (7.4) | 74-419 | (5.7) | (14.1) | Offense Road Games | 23.2 | 13.0 | 19.5 | 30:52 | 40-151 | (3.8) | 17-32 | 52.8% | 234 | (7.4) | 72-385 | (5.3) | (16.6) | Defense (All Games) | 44.1 | 20.4 | 23.4 | 28:32 | 46-268 | (5.9) | 15-26 | 59.0% | 236 | (9) | 72-504 | (7) | (11.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 35 | 17.3 | 23.4 | 29:20 | 44-229 | (5.2) | 18-31 | 59.5% | 244 | (8) | 75-473 | (6.3) | (13.5) | Defense Road Games | 49.5 | 25.2 | 23.5 | 28:50 | 49-284 | (5.7) | 12-19 | 61.5% | 219 | (11.2) | 69-503 | (7.3) | (10.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-3 | +1 | 5-5 | 6-5 | 40.8 | 21.0 | 512.9 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 29.5 | 15.1 | 435.3 | (5.8) | 1.3 | Home Games | 4-1 | -0.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 42.8 | 23.8 | 519.8 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 27.0 | 14.8 | 417.2 | (5.7) | 1.6 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -7 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 22.0 | 13.0 | 386.7 | (5.1) | 1.7 | 37.0 | 12.7 | 437.3 | (6) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 7-2 | +1.8 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 45.9 | 23.9 | 553.9 | (6.6) | 1.2 | 30.7 | 15.8 | 438.9 | (5.8) | 1.2 | Conference Games | 4-3 | -4 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 35.7 | 17.7 | 491.4 | (6.2) | 1.0 | 32.7 | 16.0 | 463.6 | (6.1) | 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 40.8 | 21.0 | 26.3 | 30:58 | 45-185 | (4.2) | 26-37 | 69.5% | 328 | (8.9) | 81-513 | (6.3) | (12.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.1 | 17.4 | 22.1 | 31:37 | 41-186 | (4.5) | 20-33 | 61.2% | 249 | (7.5) | 74-434 | (5.8) | (13.5) | Offense Home Games | 42.8 | 23.8 | 26.6 | 29:55 | 42-188 | (4.5) | 26-39 | 67.3% | 332 | (8.5) | 81-520 | (6.4) | (12.1) | Defense (All Games) | 29.5 | 15.1 | 22.8 | 29:01 | 40-147 | (3.7) | 21-35 | 59.6% | 288 | (8.3) | 74-435 | (5.8) | (14.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.5 | 15.7 | 21.9 | 29:25 | 41-183 | (4.5) | 19-32 | 60.3% | 250 | (7.8) | 73-433 | (5.9) | (13.8) | Defense Home Games | 27.0 | 14.8 | 22.6 | 30:03 | 40-141 | (3.6) | 20-33 | 60.2% | 277 | (8.3) | 73-417 | (5.7) | (15.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: SMU 34, MEMPHIS 32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
10/3/2015 | E CAROLINA | 23-49 | L | 5.5 | L | 64.5 | O | 30-40 | 20-38-289 | 0 | 54-306 | 19-26-249 | 2 | 10/8/2015 | @ HOUSTON | 28-49 | L | 24 | W | 70 | O | 39-151 | 21-35-248 | 3 | 48-214 | 16-18-243 | 1 | 10/24/2015 | @ S FLORIDA | 14-38 | L | 12 | L | 62 | U | 43-132 | 20-37-233 | 4 | 44-255 | 9-21-97 | 1 | 10/31/2015 | TULSA | 31-40 | L | 1 | L | 75 | U | 32-84 | 23-46-322 | 2 | 57-179 | 19-27-240 | 0 | 11/6/2015 | TEMPLE | 40-60 | L | 12.5 | L | 50 | O | 38-185 | 18-30-212 | 2 | 37-268 | 18-25-268 | 0 | 11/14/2015 | @ NAVY | 14-55 | L | 20 | L | 59.5 | O | 31-144 | 9-24-124 | 2 | 65-403 | 2-9-81 | 0 | 11/21/2015 | TULANE | 49-21 | W | -3 | W | 55.5 | O | 44-323 | 18-25-195 | 0 | 33-200 | 13-33-128 | 0 | 11/28/2015 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/2/2015 | @ S FLORIDA | 24-17 | W | -7 | T | 58 | U | 39-120 | 20-33-305 | 0 | 43-178 | 17-26-199 | 1 | 10/17/2015 | OLE MISS | 37-24 | W | 10 | W | 72.5 | U | 41-107 | 39-53-384 | 1 | 24-40 | 34-48-440 | 2 | 10/23/2015 | @ TULSA | 66-42 | W | -9.5 | W | 75.5 | O | 52-257 | 32-44-447 | 1 | 45-113 | 24-36-421 | 3 | 10/31/2015 | TULANE | 41-13 | W | -30 | L | 62 | U | 39-223 | 27-44-358 | 0 | 42-139 | 10-24-131 | 0 | 11/7/2015 | NAVY | 20-45 | L | -10.5 | L | 63.5 | O | 31-133 | 26-42-305 | 3 | 66-374 | 3-5-85 | 0 | 11/14/2015 | @ HOUSTON | 34-35 | L | 5 | W | 70 | U | 54-212 | 20-32-278 | 2 | 31-96 | 26-44-296 | 0 | 11/21/2015 | @ TEMPLE | 12-31 | L | -3.5 | L | 57 | U | 35-76 | 25-34-156 | 0 | 46-200 | 14-26-261 | 2 | 11/28/2015 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| SMU: SMU appears to have made a strong hire with Chad Morris, but it will take him a few years to make this a winning program again. Not only was the team 1-11 last season, but the losses were by a staggering average margin of 33.6 PPG! There is a favorable uneven split of seven home games and five road games for the Mustangs, but there are plenty of guaranteed losses on the 2015 slate. The most notable of these are versus Baylor, at TCU, at Memphis and at Houston. The best SMU can really expect is four wins. | | MEMPHIS: There is too much turnover on defense for Memphis to remain atop the American Conference standings. Although the Tigers don't have to face UCF or East Carolina, they don't have an easy road schedule with trips to Houston and Temple in back-to-back weeks, and non-AAC road trips to Kansas and Bowling Green early in the season when the defense will still be a work in progress. Memphis could also lose twice at home to Cincinnati and Ole Miss. However, there are enough seemingly easy wins (Missouri State, Tulane, Navy, SMU) to expect a winning record. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 6:41:43 AM EST. |
|
|