|
|
FLORIDA ST
MARYLAND |
|
|
46
| 41
Final
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 333 | FLORIDA ST | | | 334 | MARYLAND | N.L. |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 9-1 | -11 | 4-6 | 5-3 | 43.1 | 24.5 | 503.3 | (7.4) | 1.6 | 13.0 | 6.1 | 242.9 | (3.7) | 1.5 | | Road Games | 3-1 | -12 | 0-4 | 1-3 | 26.7 | 13.7 | 381.5 | (5.6) | 1.2 | 19.0 | 5.7 | 309.0 | (4.4) | 2.2 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 36.3 | 19.0 | 439.3 | (6.4) | 2.7 | 16.3 | 9.0 | 291.7 | (4.3) | 1.7 | | Grass Games | 9-1 | -11 | 4-6 | 5-3 | 43.1 | 24.5 | 503.3 | (7.4) | 1.6 | 13.0 | 6.1 | 242.9 | (3.7) | 1.5 | | Conference Games | 6-1 | -12 | 3-4 | 5-2 | 39.6 | 22.3 | 512.7 | (7.3) | 2.0 | 15.7 | 7.9 | 282.4 | (4.1) | 1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 43.1 | 24.5 | 23.6 | 29:53 | 37-210 | (5.6) | 21-31 | 67.8% | 294 | (9.6) | 68-503 | (7.4) | (11.7) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 35.7 | 19.3 | 22.6 | 30:25 | 40-197 | (4.9) | 21-33 | 62.8% | 255 | (7.8) | 73-452 | (6.2) | (12.7) | | Offense Road Games | 26.7 | 13.7 | 20.0 | 31:37 | 35-128 | (3.6) | 20-32 | 63.6% | 254 | (7.9) | 68-381 | (5.6) | (14.3) | | Defense (All Games) | 13.0 | 6.1 | 13.6 | 27:43 | 30-74 | (2.4) | 18-35 | 50.3% | 169 | (4.8) | 66-243 | (3.7) | (18.7) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.4 | 12.5 | 18 | 28:23 | 34-115 | (3.3) | 20-36 | 56.2% | 229 | (6.4) | 70-344 | (4.9) | (15.3) | | Defense Road Games | 19.0 | 5.7 | 16.2 | 28:23 | 29-77 | (2.6) | 23-41 | 55.4% | 232 | (5.6) | 70-309 | (4.4) | (16.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 4-6 | +1.6 | 4-5 | 4-5 | 18.9 | 8.7 | 284.3 | (4.4) | 2.7 | 24.0 | 13.2 | 315.1 | (4.7) | 1.7 | | Home Games | 2-3 | -1 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 15.6 | 4.6 | 281.2 | (4.2) | 2.6 | 19.4 | 11.4 | 288.2 | (4.5) | 1.4 | | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -2 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 13.3 | 2.3 | 258.7 | (4.1) | 2.7 | 32.7 | 21.7 | 377.3 | (5.6) | 2.3 | | Grass Games | 4-4 | +2.6 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 18.9 | 9.1 | 269.4 | (4.2) | 2.6 | 23.6 | 12.2 | 311.6 | (4.7) | 1.9 | | Conference Games | 2-4 | -0.9 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 17.3 | 6.7 | 286.2 | (4.3) | 2.3 | 25.3 | 14.2 | 351.0 | (5) | 1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 18.9 | 8.7 | 15.3 | 31:44 | 40-101 | (2.5) | 14-25 | 56.2% | 183 | (7.3) | 65-284 | (4.4) | (15) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.1 | 13.5 | 19.4 | 30:59 | 38-148 | (3.9) | 19-32 | 60.8% | 239 | (7.5) | 70-387 | (5.5) | (14.8) | | Offense Home Games | 15.6 | 4.6 | 16.0 | 32:08 | 43-118 | (2.8) | 13-24 | 55.9% | 163 | (6.9) | 66-281 | (4.2) | (18) | | Defense (All Games) | 24.0 | 13.2 | 16.4 | 28:16 | 37-113 | (3.1) | 16-30 | 52.3% | 202 | (6.7) | 67-315 | (4.7) | (13.1) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 25.6 | 15 | 19.8 | 30:01 | 38-144 | (3.7) | 19-33 | 59.0% | 235 | (7.2) | 71-379 | (5.3) | (14.8) | | Defense Home Games | 19.4 | 11.4 | 14.4 | 27:52 | 38-148 | (3.8) | 12-26 | 45.7% | 141 | (5.4) | 64-288 | (4.5) | (14.9) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: FLORIDA ST 29.1, MARYLAND 31.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/22/2012 | CLEMSON | 49-37 | W | -14.5 | L | 55 | O | 40-287 | 27-35-380 | 2 | 38-136 | 22-39-290 | 1 | | 9/29/2012 | @ S FLORIDA | 30-17 | W | -17 | L | 53 | U | 40-183 | 19-26-242 | 0 | 32-125 | 17-33-143 | 3 | | 10/6/2012 | @ NC STATE | 16-17 | L | -17 | L | 53.5 | U | 36-125 | 17-30-218 | 1 | 27-66 | 30-55-259 | 1 | | 10/13/2012 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 51-7 | W | -29 | W | 52.5 | O | 33-201 | 29-38-448 | 2 | 32-96 | 16-33-129 | 1 | | 10/20/2012 | @ MIAMI | 33-20 | W | -21 | L | 57.5 | U | 41-218 | 21-31-229 | 2 | 21-29 | 26-44-229 | 2 | | 10/27/2012 | DUKE | 48-7 | W | -27 | W | 54.5 | O | 47-261 | 9-21-299 | 4 | 33-103 | 16-37-129 | 0 | | 11/8/2012 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 28-22 | W | -13 | L | 49 | O | 25--15 | 25-42-326 | 2 | 36-87 | 19-34-298 | 3 | | 11/17/2012 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2012 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/22/2012 | @ W VIRGINIA | 21-31 | L | 25.5 | W | 61.5 | U | 35-46 | 20-30-305 | 3 | 25-25 | 30-43-338 | 0 | | 10/6/2012 | WAKE FOREST | 19-14 | W | -7 | L | 47.5 | U | 43-53 | 14-25-191 | 3 | 29-71 | 13-38-170 | 2 | | 10/13/2012 | @ VIRGINIA | 27-20 | W | 2 | W | 44 | O | 29--2 | 14-26-237 | 1 | 42-168 | 18-39-218 | 2 | | 10/20/2012 | NC STATE | 18-20 | L | 4 | W | 44.5 | U | 54-206 | 17-27-256 | 2 | 26-40 | 23-47-307 | 0 | | 10/27/2012 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 17-20 | L | 2.5 | L | 46 | U | 32-97 | 23-42-240 | 3 | 27-8 | 21-39-287 | 2 | | 11/3/2012 | GEORGIA TECH | 13-33 | L | 7.5 | L | 44.5 | O | 44-144 | 9-18-115 | 2 | 56-370 | 2-4-31 | 2 | | 11/10/2012 | @ CLEMSON | 10-45 | L | 32 | L | 55.5 | U | 43-139 | 6-12-41 | 3 | 42-135 | 23-34-301 | 3 | | 11/17/2012 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2012 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | FLORIDA ST: Last season, dual-threat QB E.J. Manuel suffered a shoulder injury in the third game of the year, which started a three-game losing skid for the Seminoles. The senior will need to stay healthy this year if the team wants to win the ACC. Manuel has a lot of weapons to throw to including sophomore Rashad Greene (596 rec, 7 TD in nine games), who could emerge as one of the top WRs in the ACC this year. On defense, it'll be a lot of the same for the Seminoles, who ranked fourth in FBS in both total defense (275 YPG) and scoring defense (15.1 PPG), as they should be one of the better teams in the nation in both categories again. Senior DE Brandon Jenkins, who has 21.5 sacks in the past two seasons, returns along with junior SS Lamarcus Joyner, who intercepted four passes last season. | | MARYLAND: One thing the Terrapins should be able to do better this coming season is defend, as 10 defensive starters return from last season's unit that allowed 457 YPG and 34.3 PPG. The experience those guys built playing together for a full year should help. Of the guys returning, sophomore DE Andre Monroe (5 sacks) will be the most important. Offensively, this team needs to find an identity. The Terps will need a big year out of senior WR Kevin Dorsey (573 rec yds) in order to help out their only capable QB on the roster in junior C.J. Brown. Brown emerged as the starting QB following Danny O'Brien's transfer to Wisconsin because nobody was able to challenge him for the spot in the spring. He'll need to be on top of his game both running (574 rush yds, 5 TD) and passing (7 TD, 6 INT) for Maryland to avoid being the ACC doormat for a second straight year. |
|
error '80070070'/includes/foxsheetfunctions.asp, line 397
|