| | CFB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
MICHIGAN ST ILLINOIS |
|
| 48 | 42 Final 3 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
157 | MICHIGAN ST | -3.5 | Over 43.5 | 158 | ILLINOIS | +15.5 | Under 55.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 6-1 | +1 | 3-3 | 3-4 | 28.1 | 14.3 | 363.1 | (4.9) | 1.1 | 13.6 | 8.7 | 227.4 | (3.6) | 1.9 | Road Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 19.5 | 8.5 | 333.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 | 15.5 | 12.0 | 242.0 | (3.8) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 27.3 | 12.7 | 393.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 | 14.0 | 9.3 | 280.3 | (4.3) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 26.0 | 10.0 | 412.0 | (5.1) | 1.0 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 264.0 | (4.3) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 3-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 27.3 | 12.7 | 393.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 | 14.0 | 9.3 | 280.3 | (4.3) | 1.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.1 | 14.3 | 21.1 | 34:12 | 41-186 | (4.5) | 18-33 | 55.7% | 177 | (5.4) | 74-363 | (4.9) | (12.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 33.8 | 17.8 | 22.4 | 32:29 | 41-193 | (4.7) | 19-32 | 59.3% | 227 | (7) | 73-419 | (5.7) | (12.4) | Offense Road Games | 19.5 | 8.5 | 19.5 | 33:55 | 36-127 | (3.5) | 20-40 | 51.2% | 206 | (5.1) | 76-333 | (4.4) | (17.1) | Defense (All Games) | 13.6 | 8.7 | 13.4 | 25:41 | 27-59 | (2.1) | 16-36 | 45.1% | 169 | (4.7) | 63-227 | (3.6) | (16.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.3 | 11.9 | 16.8 | 27:19 | 32-123 | (3.8) | 17-33 | 50.5% | 208 | (6.3) | 65-331 | (5.1) | (14.8) | Defense Road Games | 15.5 | 12.0 | 13.5 | 26:04 | 24-50 | (2.1) | 20-40 | 50.0% | 191 | (4.8) | 64-242 | (3.8) | (15.6) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | +0.2 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 35.3 | 17.8 | 446.2 | (6.3) | 1.5 | 32.3 | 12.5 | 454.5 | (6.5) | 0.8 | Home Games | 3-1 | +2.2 | 2-2 | 4-0 | 42.2 | 24.7 | 494.5 | (7) | 1.5 | 30.2 | 10.5 | 397.7 | (6) | 0.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 33.7 | 19.3 | 454.7 | (6.3) | 2.0 | 36.3 | 17.0 | 416.3 | (6.5) | 0.3 | Turf Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 37.6 | 20.8 | 470.0 | (6.5) | 1.6 | 32.0 | 13.0 | 422.4 | (6.3) | 0.6 | Conference Games | 0-2 | -2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 25.5 | 11.0 | 381.5 | (5.4) | 2.0 | 47.5 | 25.5 | 499.5 | (7.3) | 0.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 35.3 | 17.8 | 24.7 | 30:40 | 37-158 | (4.2) | 22-33 | 65.7% | 288 | (8.7) | 70-446 | (6.3) | (12.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.6 | 13.6 | 20.5 | 29:24 | 36-133 | (3.7) | 20-33 | 61.5% | 249 | (7.5) | 70-382 | (5.5) | (14.9) | Offense Home Games | 42.2 | 24.7 | 26.7 | 30:41 | 35-155 | (4.4) | 26-35 | 73.8% | 339 | (9.6) | 70-494 | (7) | (11.7) | Defense (All Games) | 32.3 | 12.5 | 22.3 | 29:19 | 41-211 | (5.2) | 18-29 | 63.8% | 243 | (8.4) | 70-454 | (6.5) | (14.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 32.4 | 14.9 | 21.3 | 31:36 | 41-191 | (4.7) | 19-31 | 62.9% | 240 | (7.8) | 71-431 | (6) | (13.3) | Defense Home Games | 30.2 | 10.5 | 20.0 | 29:19 | 36-164 | (4.5) | 18-30 | 60.5% | 233 | (7.8) | 66-398 | (6) | (13.1) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MICHIGAN ST 26.3, ILLINOIS 33.7 |
| | |
|
|
8/30/2013 | W MICHIGAN | 26-13 | W | -27.5 | L | 44 | U | 42-181 | 17-37-116 | 1 | 27-11 | 18-48-193 | 4 | 9/7/2013 | S FLORIDA | 21-6 | W | -21 | L | 41.5 | U | 38-171 | 12-24-94 | 2 | 35-89 | 6-26-66 | 2 | 9/14/2013 | YOUNGSTOWN ST | 55-17 | W | -22.5 | W | 40 | O | 49-277 | 22-32-270 | 1 | 20-51 | 11-27-121 | 2 | 9/21/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 13-17 | L | 4 | T | 43 | U | 35-119 | 16-36-135 | 1 | 32-78 | 14-34-142 | 0 | 10/5/2013 | @ IOWA | 26-14 | W | 1.5 | W | 37.5 | O | 37-135 | 25-44-277 | 1 | 16-23 | 26-46-241 | 2 | 10/12/2013 | INDIANA | 42-28 | W | -10 | W | 53.5 | O | 47-238 | 22-31-235 | 2 | 27-92 | 25-47-259 | 1 | 10/19/2013 | PURDUE | 14-0 | W | -28 | L | 44.5 | U | 41-182 | 14-26-112 | 0 | 34-66 | 14-25-160 | 2 | 10/26/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2013 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/16/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/31/2013 | S ILLINOIS | 42-34 | W | -16.5 | L | 40.5 | O | 30-49 | 29-37-415 | 2 | 26-66 | 26-41-341 | 1 | 9/7/2013 | CINCINNATI | 45-17 | W | 7 | W | 56.5 | O | 39-210 | 26-37-312 | 0 | 32-148 | 23-42-308 | 1 | 9/14/2013 | *WASHINGTON | 24-34 | L | 10.5 | W | 61 | U | 36-136 | 10-26-191 | 1 | 50-273 | 28-35-342 | 2 | 9/28/2013 | MIAMI OHIO | 50-14 | W | -27.5 | W | 49 | O | 43-289 | 23-33-312 | 2 | 41-155 | 7-15-95 | 0 | 10/5/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | 19-39 | L | 8.5 | L | 62.5 | U | 48-195 | 16-31-177 | 2 | 50-335 | 11-20-186 | 1 | 10/19/2013 | WISCONSIN | 32-56 | L | 14.5 | L | 55.5 | O | 29-72 | 26-34-319 | 2 | 46-289 | 16-21-189 | 0 | 10/26/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/2/2013 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/9/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/16/2013 | OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2013 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MICHIGAN ST: MSU finished 7-6 last year, going 4-5 in games decided by four points or less. Replacing the nation's No. 3 rusher, Le'Veon Bell, is no easy task and the team may choose a committee approach with unaccomplished RBs Jeremy Langford (2.6 YPC), Nick Hill (2.3 YPC) and Riley Bullough, a converted LB. Senior QB Andrew Maxwell (5.8 YPA, 13 TD, 9 INT) could be overtaken by sophomore QB Connor Cook (5.5 YPA, 1 TD, 1 INT). WRs Bennie Fowler (524 rec. yds, 4 TD) and Aaron Burbridge (364 rec. yds) headline a mediocre receiving unit. The O-Line should remain strong, as will the No. 4-ranked defense (274 YPG). DE WIlliam Gholston is gone, but DE Shilique Calhoun (5 hurries) is a future star. MSU's back seven is truly elite with LBs Max Bullough (111 tackles, 12.5 TFL) and Denicos Allen (79 tackles, 10 TFL), plus CB Darqueze Dennard (3 INT), who projects as a high NFL draft pick. | | ILLINOIS: Not only were the Illini 0-8 in Big Ten play under first-year coach Tim Beckham, but they lost by an average score of 35-12. The offense finished third-worst in the nation in both points (16.7 PPG) and yards (297 YPG). Illinois ditched the two-OC system and brought in new OC Bill Cubit whose offense will force QB Nathan Scheelhaase (246 pass attempts, 4 TD, 8 INT) to get the ball out quickly. WR Ryan Lankford (469 rec. yds, 5 TD) leads an unproven receiving corps, but Illinois has two capable ball carriers in RBs Donovonn Young (571 rush yds, 3 TD) and Josh Ferguson (312 rush yds). The pass defense allowed just 194 YPG (19th in FBS), but mostly because teams ran all over Illinois (194 YPG, 97th in FBS). Most of the D-Line and secondary are gone -- three to the NFL -- putting more pressure on LBs Mason Monheim (86 tackles) and Jonathan Brown (9.5 TFL) to be all over the field. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 5/7/2024 11:49:33 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|