|
|
OHIO U E MICHIGAN |
|
| 54.5 | 27 Final 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
337 | OHIO U | +8.5 | Over 46 | 338 | E MICHIGAN | +3.5 | Under 58 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 40.7 | 17.3 | 422.0 | (6.2) | 1.3 | 24.7 | 16.0 | 372.3 | (5.6) | 1.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 21.0 | 7.0 | 396.0 | (5.9) | 2.0 | 44.0 | 34.0 | 558.0 | (8.3) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 40.7 | 17.3 | 422.0 | (6.2) | 1.3 | 24.7 | 16.0 | 372.3 | (5.6) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 2-0 | +1 | 2-0 | 2-0 | 50.5 | 22.5 | 435.0 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 15.0 | 7.0 | 279.5 | (4.2) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 40.7 | 17.3 | 22.0 | 32:10 | 44-201 | (4.5) | 15-23 | 65.7% | 221 | (9.5) | 68-422 | (6.2) | (10.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 37.7 | 15.1 | 20.7 | 31:18 | 40-170 | (4.2) | 19-29 | 63.5% | 239 | (8.2) | 70-410 | (5.9) | (10.9) | Offense Road Games | 21.0 | 7.0 | 22.0 | 28:08 | 38-160 | (4.2) | 17-29 | 58.6% | 236 | (8.1) | 67-396 | (5.9) | (18.9) | Defense (All Games) | 24.7 | 16.0 | 18.3 | 27:50 | 36-146 | (4.1) | 17-31 | 54.3% | 226 | (7.2) | 67-372 | (5.6) | (15.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.4 | 13 | 18.4 | 29:42 | 33-117 | (3.5) | 20-37 | 53.3% | 223 | (6.1) | 70-340 | (4.9) | (15.2) | Defense Road Games | 44.0 | 34.0 | 25.0 | 31:52 | 44-263 | (6) | 15-23 | 65.2% | 295 | (12.8) | 67-558 | (8.3) | (12.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-0 | +2.9 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 20.0 | 13.5 | 383.5 | (5.3) | 1.5 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 303.0 | (4.6) | 2.5 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 24.0 | 17.0 | 393.0 | (5.5) | 2.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 280.0 | (4.4) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-0 | +2.9 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 20.0 | 13.5 | 383.5 | (5.3) | 1.5 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 303.0 | (4.6) | 2.5 | Turf Games | 2-0 | +2.9 | 2-0 | 0-2 | 20.0 | 13.5 | 383.5 | (5.3) | 1.5 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 303.0 | (4.6) | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.0 | 13.5 | 19.0 | 31:20 | 38-120 | (3.2) | 20-34 | 60.3% | 263 | (7.7) | 72-383 | (5.3) | (19.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.7 | 16 | 18 | 30:44 | 38-145 | (3.8) | 16-28 | 58.2% | 221 | (7.8) | 66-366 | (5.5) | (13.7) | Offense Home Games | 24.0 | 17.0 | 19.0 | 33:03 | 41-126 | (3.1) | 22-31 | 71.0% | 267 | (8.6) | 72-393 | (5.5) | (16.4) | Defense (All Games) | 10.0 | 5.0 | 14.0 | 28:40 | 32-147 | (4.5) | 14-33 | 43.3% | 156 | (4.7) | 66-303 | (4.6) | (30.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.8 | 11.3 | 18.2 | 30:16 | 39-188 | (4.8) | 15-29 | 50.9% | 145 | (5) | 68-333 | (4.9) | (14.6) | Defense Home Games | 7.0 | 7.0 | 13.0 | 26:57 | 35-166 | (4.7) | 12-29 | 41.4% | 114 | (3.9) | 64-280 | (4.4) | (40) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OHIO U 16.3, E MICHIGAN 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | HAMPTON | 59-0 | W | -36.5 | W | 47.5 | O | 53-248 | 13-19-172 | 1 | 31-68 | 6-24-40 | 2 | 9/8/2017 | @ PURDUE | 21-44 | L | 3 | L | 54 | O | 38-160 | 17-29-236 | 2 | 44-263 | 15-23-295 | 0 | 9/16/2017 | KANSAS | 42-30 | W | -7 | W | 59 | O | 42-196 | 16-22-254 | 1 | 32-108 | 30-47-343 | 1 | 9/23/2017 | @ E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2017 | CHARLOTTE | 24-7 | W | -14 | W | 59 | U | 41-126 | 22-31-267 | 2 | 35-166 | 12-29-114 | 3 | 9/9/2017 | @ RUTGERS | 16-13 | W | 6 | W | 51 | U | 35-114 | 19-37-260 | 1 | 30-128 | 17-38-198 | 2 | 9/23/2017 | OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | @ KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OHIO U: Ohio was nearly impossible to run on last year, allowing just 105.8 YPG on the ground (6th in CFB). But what was a strength last year is now a
major question mark. The team needs to replace almost its entire frontseven. Offensively, the Bobcats will lean heavily on the running game. | | E MICHIGAN: The Eagles have one of the better QBs in the conference in Brogan Roback, but the team will need to find a way to keep him upright. EMU
had a great O-Line last year, but this is a young unit this time around. On D, this team can stop the run but needs to be a bit better all around. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 12:14:24 PM EST. |
|
|