| | | CFB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
N ILLINOIS
E MICHIGAN |
|
|
62.5
| 28
Final
17 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 119 | N ILLINOIS | -15 | Over 55.5 | | 120 | E MICHIGAN | +27 | Under 67.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
|
| All Games | 5-2 | -0.2 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 32.1 | 16.1 | 476.1 | (6) | 0.7 | 27.6 | 11.1 | 405.7 | (5.7) | 0.9 | | Road Games | 2-1 | +2.2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 28.3 | 9.3 | 440.0 | (5.5) | 0.7 | 33.7 | 11.0 | 440.0 | (5.9) | 0.7 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -2.4 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 28.3 | 17.0 | 459.3 | (6.7) | 1.0 | 29.7 | 15.0 | 464.3 | (6.2) | 0.3 | | Turf Games | 4-2 | -2.4 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 33.7 | 18.8 | 488.7 | (6.2) | 0.8 | 29.7 | 13.0 | 407.7 | (5.9) | 0.8 | | Conference Games | 2-1 | -2.4 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 28.3 | 17.0 | 459.3 | (6.7) | 1.0 | 29.7 | 15.0 | 464.3 | (6.2) | 0.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 32.1 | 16.1 | 24.6 | 28:00 | 51-260 | (5.1) | 17-28 | 60.8% | 216 | (7.8) | 79-476 | (6) | (14.8) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 32.1 | 17.2 | 22.7 | 29:08 | 42-213 | (5) | 18-31 | 58.8% | 227 | (7.3) | 74-441 | (6) | (13.7) | | Offense Road Games | 28.3 | 9.3 | 24.0 | 28:43 | 52-225 | (4.3) | 17-27 | 61.0% | 215 | (7.9) | 79-440 | (5.5) | (15.5) | | Defense (All Games) | 27.6 | 11.1 | 22.1 | 31:60 | 37-141 | (3.8) | 20-34 | 59.5% | 264 | (7.8) | 71-406 | (5.7) | (14.7) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 20.5 | 10.6 | 19.4 | 31:52 | 36-135 | (3.7) | 18-33 | 56.0% | 216 | (6.6) | 69-351 | (5.1) | (17.1) | | Defense Road Games | 33.7 | 11.0 | 23.7 | 31:17 | 38-129 | (3.4) | 23-36 | 63.0% | 311 | (8.6) | 74-440 | (5.9) | (13.1) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 2-5 | +5.1 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 15.0 | 6.3 | 272.7 | (4.3) | 2.7 | 39.6 | 22.4 | 521.1 | (6.5) | 1.4 | | Home Games | 2-0 | +6.1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 34.0 | 12.0 | 437.5 | (5.7) | 0.5 | 27.5 | 15.5 | 508.0 | (6.8) | 2.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +4.1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 19.0 | 7.7 | 347.7 | (5.6) | 2.0 | 31.3 | 16.7 | 550.3 | (6.4) | 2.0 | | Turf Games | 2-3 | +5.1 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 18.2 | 8.8 | 329.8 | (4.8) | 1.6 | 27.8 | 15.6 | 499.4 | (6.4) | 1.8 | | Conference Games | 1-2 | +4.1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 19.0 | 7.7 | 347.7 | (5.6) | 2.0 | 31.3 | 16.7 | 550.3 | (6.4) | 2.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 15.0 | 6.3 | 14.7 | 25:25 | 39-157 | (4) | 12-25 | 49.7% | 116 | (4.7) | 64-273 | (4.3) | (18.2) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 28.9 | 15 | 21.1 | 29:24 | 41-180 | (4.4) | 18-32 | 57.2% | 208 | (6.6) | 73-389 | (5.3) | (13.5) | | Offense Home Games | 34.0 | 12.0 | 24.0 | 27:17 | 52-314 | (6) | 14-24 | 58.3% | 123 | (5.1) | 76-437 | (5.7) | (12.9) | | Defense (All Games) | 39.6 | 22.4 | 24.3 | 34:35 | 41-223 | (5.4) | 24-39 | 63.0% | 298 | (7.7) | 80-521 | (6.5) | (13.2) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.5 | 17.4 | 22.2 | 31:58 | 38-173 | (4.6) | 21-36 | 59.3% | 267 | (7.5) | 74-440 | (6) | (14) | | Defense Home Games | 27.5 | 15.5 | 21.0 | 32:43 | 38-182 | (4.7) | 22-36 | 61.6% | 326 | (8.9) | 75-508 | (6.8) | (18.5) |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: N ILLINOIS 23.1, E MICHIGAN 24.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/28/2014 | PRESBYTERIAN | 55-3 | W | -40.5 | W | 59.5 | U | 77-424 | 19-32-211 | 0 | 31-69 | 10-18-58 | 3 | | 9/6/2014 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 23-15 | W | 7 | W | 59 | U | 55-221 | 13-23-180 | 0 | 37-72 | 28-43-322 | 1 | | 9/13/2014 | @ UNLV | 48-34 | W | -9.5 | W | 62.5 | O | 69-331 | 18-28-285 | 1 | 32-102 | 24-42-397 | 1 | | 9/20/2014 | @ ARKANSAS | 14-52 | L | 13.5 | L | 64.5 | O | 32-123 | 19-31-180 | 1 | 45-212 | 16-23-215 | 0 | | 10/4/2014 | KENT ST | 17-14 | W | -25 | L | 59 | U | 39-181 | 15-25-198 | 1 | 37-83 | 20-38-244 | 0 | | 10/11/2014 | C MICHIGAN | 17-34 | L | -8 | L | 57 | U | 33-110 | 18-33-231 | 1 | 46-283 | 20-31-269 | 1 | | 10/18/2014 | MIAMI OHIO | 51-41 | W | -13.5 | L | 58 | O | 55-433 | 16-22-225 | 1 | 30-168 | 23-42-346 | 0 | | 10/25/2014 | @ E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/5/2014 | @ BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/11/2014 | TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/18/2014 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/30/2014 | MORGAN ST | 31-28 | W | -16.5 | L | | - | 56-292 | 18-30-99 | 0 | 41-210 | 18-28-269 | 1 | | 9/6/2014 | @ FLORIDA | 0-65 | L | 41 | L | 56.5 | O | 34-80 | 9-21-45 | 5 | 39-259 | 33-47-396 | 0 | | 9/13/2014 | @ OLD DOMINION | 3-17 | L | 20.5 | W | 69 | U | 48-143 | 12-24-72 | 2 | 37-180 | 17-30-187 | 2 | | 9/20/2014 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 14-73 | L | 43 | L | 53.5 | O | 19-20 | 10-29-115 | 6 | 60-336 | 14-19-160 | 1 | | 10/4/2014 | @ AKRON | 6-31 | L | 26 | W | 50.5 | U | 37-94 | 17-30-185 | 4 | 31-197 | 33-50-355 | 0 | | 10/11/2014 | BUFFALO | 37-27 | W | 14.5 | W | 56 | O | 49-337 | 10-18-147 | 1 | 36-154 | 27-45-383 | 3 | | 10/18/2014 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | 14-36 | L | 15 | L | 63 | U | 32-133 | 10-21-147 | 1 | 43-225 | 28-51-337 | 3 | | 10/25/2014 | N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/1/2014 | C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2014 | @ W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2014 | @ BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |  | N ILLINOIS: The Huskies begin life after Jordan Lynch with QBs Matt McIntosh (9-for-15, 111 yds, 3 TD, 0 INT career), Drew Hare (5-for-9, 153 yds, 2 TD, 0 INT) or Anthony Maddie, a Western Michigan transfer. Strong skill players remain in RBs Cameron Stingily (1,119 rush yds, 9 TD) and Akeem Daniels (706 total yds, 11 TD in 2012) and WRs Da'Ron Brown (752 rec yds, 9 TD) and Tommylee Lewis (86 rec, 715 yds). LBs Jamaal Bass (85 tackles) and Boomer Mays (82 tackles) can play, but the D-Line and secondary both need help. | | E MICHIGAN: The Eagles were awful last year, especially in MAC play where they were 1-7 and outscored by 30.6 PPG. Enter FBS newcomer Chris Creighton to make this a more pass-oriented offense with QB Brogan Roback (5.5 YPA, 4 TD, 5 INT) finding TE Tyreese Russell (594 rec yds) and WR Dustin Creel (593 rec yds, 5 TD). But the team's best offensive player is still RB Bronson Hill (1,098 rush yds, 5.6 YPC, 5 TD). The EMU defense is atrocious, especially in pass coverage. Junior LB Ike Spearman (82 tackles) is the lone bright spot. |
| | Game Notes: |
| | Last Updated: 5/26/2024 12:00:17 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|