| | | |
TOLEDO First Half Results E MICHIGAN |
|
| 27.5 | 21 Final 10 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
123 | TOLEDO | -8.5 | 124 | E MICHIGAN | 29 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 5-1 | +3.6 | 5-1 | 2-3 | 33.8 | 17.0 | 445.0 | (5.8) | 1.0 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 451.8 | (6.1) | 2.2 | Road Games | 2-1 | +1.6 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 29.3 | 17.0 | 461.0 | (5.6) | 0.3 | 24.0 | 12.3 | 518.3 | (6.7) | 3.3 | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 41.7 | 18.0 | 452.0 | (6.4) | 1.3 | 26.7 | 14.0 | 403.3 | (5.4) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 5-0 | +4.6 | 4-1 | 2-2 | 37.2 | 17.6 | 462.4 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 25.2 | 13.0 | 417.4 | (5.8) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 3-0 | +3 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 38.0 | 18.0 | 468.7 | (6.6) | 1.3 | 22.3 | 10.3 | 376.3 | (5.4) | 2.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 33.8 | 17.0 | 23.7 | 31:37 | 39-178 | (4.6) | 24-38 | 62.8% | 267 | (7.1) | 77-445 | (5.8) | (13.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.4 | 15.9 | 20.8 | 31:06 | 39-171 | (4.4) | 21-34 | 63.2% | 245 | (7.3) | 73-417 | (5.7) | (13.3) | Offense Road Games | 29.3 | 17.0 | 26.3 | 33:29 | 43-214 | (5) | 23-40 | 56.2% | 247 | (6.1) | 83-461 | (5.6) | (15.7) | Defense (All Games) | 25.0 | 12.5 | 23.2 | 28:23 | 32-142 | (4.4) | 27-42 | 63.5% | 310 | (7.4) | 74-452 | (6.1) | (18.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28 | 13.8 | 22.6 | 30:13 | 34-136 | (4) | 25-41 | 60.9% | 288 | (7.1) | 75-424 | (5.7) | (15.2) | Defense Road Games | 24.0 | 12.3 | 26.0 | 26:31 | 36-198 | (5.6) | 26-42 | 62.4% | 320 | (7.7) | 77-518 | (6.7) | (21.6) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 0-5 | -3.6 | 1-4 | 3-1 | 15.4 | 10.0 | 262.0 | (4.6) | 2.4 | 37.2 | 15.2 | 487.6 | (6.1) | 1.4 | Home Games | 0-2 | -2.6 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 14.0 | 10.5 | 224.0 | (4.7) | 3.5 | 36.0 | 13.5 | 419.0 | (5.4) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 12.3 | 7.7 | 232.0 | (4.3) | 2.0 | 39.3 | 17.7 | 490.3 | (6.5) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 0-3 | -3.6 | 0-3 | 2-0 | 18.0 | 11.3 | 271.3 | (5) | 2.7 | 36.3 | 13.3 | 478.0 | (5.7) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 0-2 | -2 | 0-2 | 2-0 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 283.0 | (5.4) | 1.5 | 39.0 | 15.0 | 531.5 | (6) | 1.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 15.4 | 10.0 | 12.2 | 23:54 | 31-121 | (4) | 12-26 | 47.3% | 141 | (5.4) | 57-262 | (4.6) | (17) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23.7 | 13.9 | 17.8 | 26:06 | 34-130 | (3.9) | 18-32 | 56.9% | 220 | (6.8) | 66-350 | (5.3) | (14.8) | Offense Home Games | 14.0 | 10.5 | 9.0 | 19:32 | 26-105 | (4) | 10-21 | 47.6% | 119 | (5.7) | 47-224 | (4.7) | (16) | Defense (All Games) | 37.2 | 15.2 | 25.6 | 35:48 | 50-305 | (6.1) | 18-29 | 60.5% | 182 | (6.2) | 80-488 | (6.1) | (13.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.2 | 15.1 | 22.8 | 34:35 | 43-187 | (4.4) | 21-34 | 61.5% | 227 | (6.6) | 77-413 | (5.4) | (13.3) | Defense Home Games | 36.0 | 13.5 | 24.0 | 39:43 | 55-268 | (4.9) | 14-23 | 60.9% | 150 | (6.5) | 78-419 | (5.4) | (11.6) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TOLEDO 24, E MICHIGAN 25.6 |
| | |
|
|
9/1/2012 | @ ARIZONA | 17-24 | L | 10.5 | W | 64 | U | 47-161 | 21-47-197 | 1 | 41-237 | 30-47-387 | 3 | 9/8/2012 | @ WYOMING | 34-31 | W | 3.5 | W | 58.5 | O | 44-204 | 25-41-300 | 0 | 36-184 | 22-32-342 | 3 | 9/15/2012 | BOWLING GREEN | 27-15 | W | -3 | W | 61 | U | 39-130 | 21-29-322 | 1 | 29-135 | 24-36-216 | 1 | 9/22/2012 | COASTAL CAROLINA | 38-28 | W | -29 | L | | - | 31-112 | 27-36-290 | 1 | 34-76 | 30-47-356 | 0 | 9/29/2012 | @ W MICHIGAN | 37-17 | W | 1 | W | 57 | U | 37-278 | 22-33-243 | 0 | 30-173 | 26-46-232 | 4 | 10/6/2012 | C MICHIGAN | 50-35 | W | -11.5 | W | 64 | O | 36-183 | 26-40-250 | 3 | 24-46 | 28-44-327 | 2 | 10/13/2012 | @ E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/6/2012 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/30/2012 | @ BALL ST | 26-37 | L | 3 | L | 55.5 | O | 33-180 | 15-34-186 | 1 | 55-329 | 26-41-267 | 1 | 9/8/2012 | ILLINOIS ST | 14-31 | L | -3 | L | | - | 32-103 | 11-25-145 | 5 | 53-216 | 14-22-155 | 2 | 9/15/2012 | @ PURDUE | 16-54 | L | 23.5 | L | 49.5 | O | 38-169 | 14-29-144 | 3 | 42-392 | 19-31-184 | 2 | 9/22/2012 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 7-23 | L | 31.5 | W | 47 | U | 29-46 | 13-26-137 | 1 | 44-269 | 16-29-159 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | KENT ST | 14-41 | L | 3 | L | 47 | O | 21-107 | 9-17-93 | 2 | 57-321 | 14-24-146 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/1/2012 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | TOLEDO: Toledo is going to be sporting one of the most unique offenses in college football that features two very talented quarterbacks. Austin Dantin (1,404 pass yds, 15 TD) is the more traditional pocket passer, while Terrance Owens (2,022 pass yds, 18 TD) is a threat to run as well as throw. The quarterbacks switch off based on different situations, but these Rockets have an explosive offense and that shouldn't change in 2012, even with new head coach Matt Campbell taking over for Tim Beckman, who left for the Illinois job. Toledo has a quality RB in David Fluellen and if the offensive line can create holes and protect the pass, the Rockets offense should be no different than last year. On the defensive end, they'll need to do a better job. Last season the Rockets struggled to stay healthy and it caught up with them, as they were often involved in high-scoring affairs. They'll need to be at full strength in order to win the MAC, otherwise they'll just be an exciting team to watch lose. They do have hope with the arrival of Michigan transfer Vladimir Emilien, who will play LB for Campbell, and LB Dan Molls, who was out for half of the 2011 season after a huge 2010 campaign. | | E MICHIGAN: The Eagles could be heading in the right direction, as they will be returning most of their starters on a team that showed a lot of promise in 2011. Dual-threat QB Alex Gillett (1,504 pass yds, 14 TD; 736 rush yds, 3 TD) is going to need to be every bit as versatile as he was last season while continuing to improve his accuracy after cutting down his interceptions from 13 in 2010 to just seven in 2011. Javanti Greene must improve, as it's crucial for a team's top running back to do his job and rush for more yards than the quarterback. The Eagles were one of the best teams in the nation at stopping teams on third down, something all teams wish they could do. The secondary was an issue for them last year, but all of their starters are back and that bodes well for a team that needed experience last season. This defense lost three important players, but has players returning that are more than ready to step in their absence. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 5/5/2024 11:55:20 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|