|
|
MIAMI OHIO C MICHIGAN |
|
| 51 | 31 Final 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
339 | MIAMI OHIO | 54 | -2 | 340 | C MICHIGAN | -2.5 | 51.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -3.6 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 24.7 | 13.7 | 338.3 | (4.6) | 2.0 | 20.7 | 10.3 | 299.3 | (4.8) | 2.3 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1.8 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 26.0 | 13.0 | 429.0 | (5) | 2.0 | 31.0 | 21.0 | 267.0 | (4.9) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -3.6 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 24.7 | 13.7 | 338.3 | (4.6) | 2.0 | 20.7 | 10.3 | 299.3 | (4.8) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 1-2 | -3.6 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 24.7 | 13.7 | 338.3 | (4.6) | 2.0 | 20.7 | 10.3 | 299.3 | (4.8) | 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.7 | 13.7 | 19.0 | 33:38 | 41-117 | (2.8) | 17-33 | 51.0% | 221 | (6.8) | 74-338 | (4.6) | (13.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23.9 | 13.3 | 17.9 | 31:16 | 41-142 | (3.5) | 16-28 | 56.6% | 192 | (6.9) | 69-334 | (4.9) | (13.9) | Offense Road Games | 26.0 | 13.0 | 25.0 | 35:44 | 42-131 | (3.1) | 23-44 | 52.3% | 298 | (6.8) | 86-429 | (5) | (16.5) | Defense (All Games) | 20.7 | 10.3 | 16.0 | 26:22 | 32-119 | (3.7) | 18-30 | 60.4% | 180 | (5.9) | 63-299 | (4.8) | (14.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 18.8 | 10.3 | 17 | 29:44 | 36-133 | (3.7) | 17-31 | 54.9% | 176 | (5.6) | 67-309 | (4.6) | (16.5) | Defense Road Games | 31.0 | 21.0 | 15.0 | 24:16 | 25-59 | (2.4) | 20-30 | 66.7% | 208 | (6.9) | 55-267 | (4.9) | (8.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +0.8 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 30.7 | 18.0 | 490.3 | (5.7) | 2.7 | 31.7 | 10.0 | 480.3 | (5.9) | 3.7 | Home Games | 1-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 30.0 | 13.0 | 499.0 | (4.8) | 4.0 | 27.0 | 0.0 | 392.0 | (5.5) | 6.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +0.8 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 30.7 | 18.0 | 490.3 | (5.7) | 2.7 | 31.7 | 10.0 | 480.3 | (5.9) | 3.7 | Turf Games | 2-0 | +1.8 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 37.5 | 18.5 | 544.5 | (6.2) | 2.5 | 27.0 | 3.0 | 431.0 | (5.2) | 4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 30.7 | 18.0 | 24.0 | 30:56 | 40-158 | (4) | 26-46 | 57.7% | 332 | (7.3) | 85-490 | (5.7) | (16) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.4 | 13.4 | 20.3 | 31:60 | 40-156 | (3.9) | 23-42 | 56.1% | 257 | (6.2) | 81-413 | (5.1) | (15) | Offense Home Games | 30.0 | 13.0 | 24.0 | 31:50 | 50-246 | (4.9) | 28-54 | 51.9% | 253 | (4.7) | 104-499 | (4.8) | (16.6) | Defense (All Games) | 31.7 | 10.0 | 20.7 | 29:04 | 36-185 | (5.1) | 24-46 | 52.6% | 295 | (6.5) | 82-480 | (5.9) | (15.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 32.2 | 12.1 | 21.2 | 29:00 | 35-137 | (3.9) | 26-44 | 58.2% | 308 | (7) | 79-445 | (5.6) | (13.8) | Defense Home Games | 27.0 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 28:10 | 31-108 | (3.5) | 21-40 | 52.5% | 284 | (7.1) | 71-392 | (5.5) | (14.5) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MIAMI OHIO 15.7, C MICHIGAN 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/2017 | @ MARSHALL | 26-31 | L | -4 | L | 48.5 | O | 42-131 | 23-44-298 | 2 | 25-59 | 20-30-208 | 2 | 9/9/2017 | AUSTIN PEAY | 31-10 | W | -35 | L | 59.5 | U | 50-150 | 11-23-145 | 3 | 37-160 | 11-18-110 | 3 | 9/16/2017 | CINCINNATI | 17-21 | L | -3.5 | L | 49 | U | 32-70 | 16-31-221 | 1 | 35-139 | 24-43-222 | 2 | 9/23/2017 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | @ KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2017 | RHODE ISLAND | 30-27 | W | -33.5 | L | 56 | O | 50-246 | 28-54-253 | 4 | 31-108 | 21-40-284 | 6 | 9/9/2017 | @ KANSAS | 45-27 | W | 5.5 | W | 55.5 | O | 35-123 | 28-37-467 | 1 | 34-147 | 32-62-323 | 2 | 9/16/2017 | @ SYRACUSE | 17-41 | L | 7.5 | L | 66.5 | U | 34-105 | 23-46-277 | 3 | 44-300 | 19-35-279 | 3 | 9/23/2017 | MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/30/2017 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/7/2017 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/14/2017 | TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/21/2017 | @ BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MIAMI OHIO: After starting the season 0-6 last year, the RedHawks finished 6-6 and made it to a bowl game. A big reason for that was a switch to QB Gus Ragland, who is back for Miami this season. With him at the helm, there's no reason this team can't build off of last year's success. | | C MICHIGAN: It's not going to be easy to get over the loss of Cooper Rush, who struggled at times but did have a big arm. His replacement, Tommy Lazzaro, is fortunate enough to have plenty of weapons. Defensively, CMU is talented but needs to stay healthy. They didn't last year. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 7:11:47 AM EST. |
|
|