|
|
CINCINNATI BYU |
|
| 68 | 24 Final 38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
111 | CINCINNATI | 62 | 67.5 | 112 | BYU | -6 | -6 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | -1.1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 39.0 | 24.4 | 587.2 | (6.8) | 3.0 | 30.6 | 17.6 | 397.4 | (5.9) | 0.8 | Road Games | 1-1 | -1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 41.5 | 27.0 | 648.5 | (6.7) | 3.5 | 43.0 | 25.5 | 509.0 | (6.9) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.2 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 39.0 | 27.0 | 581.0 | (6.7) | 2.7 | 36.3 | 23.7 | 481.7 | (6.6) | 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 39.0 | 24.4 | 32.2 | 31:29 | 41-201 | (4.9) | 28-45 | 60.8% | 386 | (8.5) | 87-587 | (6.8) | (15.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.3 | 19.4 | 23.5 | 30:54 | 39-175 | (4.5) | 22-36 | 60.3% | 271 | (7.5) | 75-446 | (5.9) | (14.7) | Offense Road Games | 41.5 | 27.0 | 35.5 | 35:07 | 45-207 | (4.6) | 30-52 | 57.7% | 441 | (8.5) | 97-648 | (6.7) | (15.6) | Defense (All Games) | 30.6 | 17.6 | 17.4 | 28:31 | 37-167 | (4.6) | 17-31 | 55.1% | 230 | (7.4) | 68-397 | (5.9) | (13) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.3 | 14.3 | 19.4 | 30:42 | 38-144 | (3.8) | 17-31 | 56.3% | 241 | (7.8) | 69-385 | (5.6) | (13.6) | Defense Road Games | 43.0 | 25.5 | 19.5 | 24:52 | 39-189 | (4.8) | 19-35 | 54.3% | 320 | (9.1) | 74-509 | (6.9) | (11.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-2 | +2.9 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 27.7 | 12.7 | 408.2 | (5.4) | 1.5 | 26.3 | 14.3 | 400.7 | (5.8) | 2.2 | Home Games | 3-0 | +3.1 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 36.7 | 14.0 | 476.0 | (5.9) | 2.3 | 25.0 | 12.7 | 369.7 | (5.6) | 2.7 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 25.0 | 11.7 | 384.0 | (5.1) | 1.7 | 27.3 | 19.7 | 398.7 | (5.8) | 1.7 | Grass Games | 3-1 | +2.1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 33.2 | 13.0 | 458.2 | (5.5) | 2.0 | 24.7 | 10.2 | 377.7 | (5.8) | 2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.7 | 12.7 | 21.3 | 31:17 | 35-126 | (3.6) | 24-40 | 60.7% | 282 | (7) | 76-408 | (5.4) | (14.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 20.1 | 9.6 | 18.6 | 29:25 | 36-130 | (3.6) | 18-34 | 53.5% | 210 | (6.2) | 70-339 | (4.9) | (16.9) | Offense Home Games | 36.7 | 14.0 | 24.3 | 32:52 | 41-138 | (3.4) | 26-40 | 63.6% | 338 | (8.4) | 81-476 | (5.9) | (13) | Defense (All Games) | 26.3 | 14.3 | 20.5 | 28:43 | 36-156 | (4.3) | 20-33 | 59.9% | 245 | (7.5) | 69-401 | (5.8) | (15.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 31.2 | 17 | 21.4 | 31:34 | 39-174 | (4.5) | 21-33 | 62.0% | 251 | (7.5) | 72-425 | (5.9) | (13.6) | Defense Home Games | 25.0 | 12.7 | 19.3 | 27:08 | 30-86 | (2.9) | 23-36 | 63.9% | 283 | (7.9) | 66-370 | (5.6) | (14.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CINCINNATI 27.6, BYU 43.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | ALABAMA A&M | 52-10 | W | -46 | L | 58.5 | O | 51-296 | 26-38-340 | 2 | 37-98 | 10-26-148 | 1 | 9/12/2015 | TEMPLE | 26-34 | L | -5.5 | L | 55.5 | O | 31-130 | 30-52-427 | 5 | 36-215 | 13-20-81 | 1 | 9/19/2015 | @ MIAMI OHIO | 37-33 | W | -21 | L | 59 | O | 54-282 | 22-40-263 | 4 | 41-220 | 14-34-228 | 1 | 9/24/2015 | @ MEMPHIS | 46-53 | L | 8 | W | 70.5 | O | 36-132 | 38-64-620 | 3 | 37-158 | 24-36-412 | 1 | 10/1/2015 | MIAMI | 34-23 | W | 7 | W | 70 | U | 34-167 | 22-33-279 | 1 | 32-146 | 25-40-281 | 0 | 10/16/2015 | @ BYU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/24/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/31/2015 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2015 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/14/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/5/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 33-28 | W | 5 | W | 57.5 | O | 26-132 | 28-46-379 | 1 | 37-126 | 24-41-319 | 2 | 9/12/2015 | BOISE ST | 35-24 | W | 2 | W | 56 | O | 39-72 | 17-29-309 | 2 | 31-64 | 25-38-297 | 3 | 9/19/2015 | @ UCLA | 23-24 | L | 16.5 | W | 58 | U | 41-161 | 30-47-244 | 1 | 38-296 | 11-23-106 | 3 | 9/26/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 0-31 | L | 7 | L | 48.5 | U | 22-50 | 12-28-55 | 0 | 51-254 | 14-25-194 | 0 | 10/2/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 30-13 | W | -15 | W | 44 | U | 41-174 | 35-54-365 | 3 | 27-62 | 14-28-168 | 2 | 10/10/2015 | E CAROLINA | 45-38 | W | -10 | L | 60 | O | 43-167 | 25-38-341 | 2 | 32-133 | 30-42-385 | 3 | 10/16/2015 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/24/2015 | WAGNER | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/6/2015 | @ SAN JOSE ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/14/2015 | *MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI: Offensively, the Bearcats will be the class of the American with star QB Gunner Kiel leading the attack. The defense has plenty of question marks though, and the conference schedule is not easy. Of the four opponents coming off winning records in the AAC, three will be played on the road (at Memphis, at ECU, at Houston) while newcomer Navy and conference doormats Tulane (3-9) and SMU (1-11) are not on the 2015 slate. Back-to-back midseason non-conference games versus Miami-Florida and at BYU will also be tricky. Cincinnati will likely reach a fifth straight bowl, but may not win the AAC title. | | BYU: If the Cougars remain the fourth-most penalized team in the nation (81.0 yards per game), they may not be able to extend their bowl streak to 11 straight appearances because of an absolutely brutal 2015 schedule. A winless September is a real possibility with games against four potential Top 25 teams (at Nebraska, vs. Boise State, at UCLA, at Michigan). October and November are obviously easier, but playing at Utah State, Missouri in K.C., and home tilts versus Cincinnati, Fresno State and ECU will provide significant challenges. That leaves only UConn, Wagner and San Jose St. as guaranteed wins. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:03:04 PM EST. |
|
|