|
|
MIAMI OHIO BOWLING GREEN |
|
| 55 | 38 Final 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
333 | MIAMI OHIO | -240 | 334 | BOWLING GREEN | +190 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 0-3 | -3.4 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 10.3 | 3.3 | 280.3 | (4.5) | 1.3 | 27.3 | 15.7 | 323.7 | (4.7) | 0.7 | Road Games | 0-2 | -2.2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 198.5 | (3.5) | 2.0 | 23.5 | 13.0 | 264.0 | (4) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -3.4 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 10.3 | 3.3 | 280.3 | (4.5) | 1.3 | 27.3 | 15.7 | 323.7 | (4.7) | 0.7 | Turf Games | 0-3 | -3.4 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 10.3 | 3.3 | 280.3 | (4.5) | 1.3 | 27.3 | 15.7 | 323.7 | (4.7) | 0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 10.3 | 3.3 | 14.7 | 26:57 | 26-79 | (3.1) | 19-37 | 52.7% | 201 | (5.5) | 62-280 | (4.5) | (27.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 13 | 4.7 | 14.1 | 27:57 | 29-90 | (3.1) | 19-35 | 53.1% | 177 | (5) | 64-267 | (4.2) | (20.5) | Offense Road Games | 1.5 | 1.5 | 10.5 | 26:19 | 25-75 | (3) | 16-32 | 51.6% | 123 | (3.9) | 57-198 | (3.5) | (132.3) | Defense (All Games) | 27.3 | 15.7 | 19.7 | 33:03 | 44-159 | (3.6) | 15-25 | 59.5% | 165 | (6.7) | 69-324 | (4.7) | (11.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 33.9 | 21.3 | 21.7 | 33:55 | 44-192 | (4.4) | 18-29 | 60.3% | 210 | (7.2) | 73-402 | (5.5) | (11.8) | Defense Road Games | 23.5 | 13.0 | 17.5 | 33:41 | 47-153 | (3.2) | 10-18 | 54.1% | 111 | (6) | 66-264 | (4) | (11.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | 0 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 26.7 | 19.7 | 311.7 | (4.2) | 1.7 | 46.0 | 22.7 | 522.3 | (7.3) | 2.3 | Home Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 28.0 | 21.0 | 273.0 | (4) | 1.0 | 40.0 | 15.5 | 531.5 | (7.3) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 26.7 | 19.7 | 311.7 | (4.2) | 1.7 | 46.0 | 22.7 | 522.3 | (7.3) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 1-2 | 0 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 26.7 | 19.7 | 311.7 | (4.2) | 1.7 | 46.0 | 22.7 | 522.3 | (7.3) | 2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 26.7 | 19.7 | 20.0 | 32:11 | 39-94 | (2.4) | 22-35 | 63.2% | 218 | (6.2) | 75-312 | (4.2) | (11.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.7 | 17.7 | 18.4 | 31:05 | 37-98 | (2.6) | 20-34 | 58.5% | 239 | (7) | 72-337 | (4.7) | (12.2) | Offense Home Games | 28.0 | 21.0 | 19.5 | 29:15 | 34-72 | (2.1) | 22-33 | 67.2% | 200 | (6) | 67-273 | (4) | (9.7) | Defense (All Games) | 46.0 | 22.7 | 22.7 | 27:49 | 52-348 | (6.7) | 8-20 | 42.4% | 174 | (8.8) | 71-522 | (7.3) | (11.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 36.1 | 19.4 | 20 | 29:55 | 47-239 | (5.1) | 12-24 | 49.3% | 172 | (7.2) | 71-412 | (5.8) | (11.4) | Defense Home Games | 40.0 | 15.5 | 23.5 | 30:44 | 56-416 | (7.4) | 7-16 | 42.4% | 115 | (7) | 73-531 | (7.3) | (13.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MIAMI OHIO 32, BOWLING GREEN 22 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | MARSHALL | 28-35 | L | -1.5 | L | 51.5 | O | 27-87 | 25-46-357 | 0 | 38-171 | 24-37-272 | 0 | 9/8/2018 | *CINCINNATI | 0-21 | L | -1 | L | 45 | U | 19-59 | 22-41-139 | 1 | 51-188 | 6-11-45 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 3-26 | L | 13.5 | L | 47.5 | U | 31-91 | 11-23-108 | 3 | 44-118 | 14-26-177 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | @ BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ ARMY | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | @ OREGON | 24-58 | L | 32.5 | L | 69.5 | O | 50-136 | 22-39-253 | 3 | 42-212 | 11-26-292 | 3 | 9/8/2018 | MARYLAND | 14-45 | L | 13 | L | 65.5 | U | 28-15 | 17-27-143 | 1 | 53-444 | 8-16-121 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | E KENTUCKY | 42-35 | W | -15 | L | | - | 40-130 | 28-40-258 | 1 | 60-389 | 6-17-109 | 3 | 9/22/2018 | MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | @ TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MIAMI OHIO: Quarterback Gus Ragland and first-team All-MAC wide receiver James Gardner form the foundation of one of the conference's best passing attacks. With the two of them feeding off of one another, the RedHawks will be explosive offensively. They'll just need a bit of help from the running game, which should be more than doable with 2017 leading rushers Kenny Young and Alonzo Smith both returning.. Defensively, Miami returns eight starters. The problem is that the secondary is a bit depleted, which could be an issue. The RedHawks lost a lot of close games last year, and mistakes on the backend could similarly doom them in 2018. | | BOWLING GREEN: The Falcons brought in a new defensive coordinator in Carl Pelini, who inherits a bad defense but a good number of experienced players. It's entirely possible that he breathes life into the unit. As a guy that loves coaching defensive linemen, he'll love having end David Konowalski on his side. On offense, quarterback Jarret Doege and wide receiver Scott Miller should revitalize a passing game that hasn't been there in recent seasons. And running back Andrew Clair will look to improve on what was an impressive freshman campaign. The Falcons aren't quite there yet, but they could be pretty good soon. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 10:00:05 PM EST. |
|
|