|
|
MIAMI OHIO First Half Results BOWLING GREEN |
|
| 26.5 | 6 Final 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
117 | MIAMI OHIO | 27.5 | 118 | BOWLING GREEN | -4 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | +1 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 24.8 | 14.8 | 394.5 | (5.7) | 1.5 | 37.7 | 16.3 | 502.5 | (6.5) | 1.3 | Road Games | 1-3 | 0 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 23.0 | 15.2 | 405.7 | (5.7) | 1.7 | 49.0 | 22.0 | 548.7 | (7.2) | 0.7 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 32.3 | 21.0 | 497.3 | (6.7) | 1.7 | 39.0 | 18.3 | 509.7 | (6.6) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 3-3 | +1 | 1-5 | 3-2 | 24.8 | 14.8 | 394.5 | (5.7) | 1.5 | 37.7 | 16.3 | 502.5 | (6.5) | 1.3 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 41.5 | 24.5 | 556.5 | (7.3) | 0.5 | 32.5 | 15.5 | 550.0 | (6.9) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.8 | 14.8 | 21.7 | 30:13 | 29-104 | (3.5) | 26-40 | 63.6% | 291 | (7.2) | 70-394 | (5.7) | (15.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.9 | 13.1 | 21.5 | 32:57 | 38-166 | (4.4) | 21-34 | 62.4% | 235 | (6.9) | 72-400 | (5.6) | (14.8) | Offense Road Games | 23.0 | 15.2 | 21.0 | 29:39 | 25-74 | (2.9) | 28-46 | 62.0% | 332 | (7.2) | 71-406 | (5.7) | (17.6) | Defense (All Games) | 37.7 | 16.3 | 26.2 | 29:39 | 43-243 | (5.6) | 21-34 | 61.8% | 260 | (7.6) | 77-502 | (6.5) | (13.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26.7 | 14 | 20.9 | 28:14 | 37-169 | (4.6) | 20-34 | 58.3% | 228 | (6.7) | 71-397 | (5.6) | (14.9) | Defense Road Games | 49.0 | 22.0 | 28.0 | 30:21 | 43-261 | (6) | 22-32 | 67.7% | 288 | (8.9) | 76-549 | (7.2) | (11.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-5 | 20.3 | 8.5 | 387.8 | (5.5) | 1.5 | 20.3 | 12.7 | 343.0 | (5.3) | 1.2 | Home Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 34.5 | 20.5 | 455.5 | (6.7) | 1.5 | 10.5 | 7.0 | 264.5 | (4.7) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 24.0 | 11.3 | 425.3 | (5.9) | 1.3 | 18.3 | 13.0 | 294.3 | (4.4) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 3-1 | +1 | 2-2 | 0-3 | 27.0 | 11.0 | 433.5 | (6.3) | 1.2 | 14.5 | 10.2 | 324.2 | (5.1) | 1.2 | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 19.5 | 1.5 | 411.5 | (5.8) | 1.0 | 18.5 | 13.5 | 384.0 | (5.3) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.3 | 8.5 | 21.2 | 29:03 | 32-159 | (5) | 21-39 | 53.9% | 228 | (5.9) | 71-388 | (5.5) | (19.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 30.5 | 17.2 | 22.7 | 30:16 | 37-170 | (4.5) | 21-35 | 59.1% | 261 | (7.5) | 72-431 | (6) | (14.1) | Offense Home Games | 34.5 | 20.5 | 24.0 | 29:23 | 33-148 | (4.5) | 24-34 | 69.6% | 307 | (8.9) | 67-455 | (6.7) | (13.2) | Defense (All Games) | 20.3 | 12.7 | 16.7 | 30:51 | 34-131 | (3.9) | 19-31 | 61.9% | 212 | (6.7) | 65-343 | (5.3) | (16.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.6 | 12.9 | 18.2 | 30:28 | 35-137 | (3.9) | 21-34 | 60.5% | 220 | (6.5) | 69-357 | (5.2) | (14.6) | Defense Home Games | 10.5 | 7.0 | 11.5 | 30:36 | 26-51 | (2) | 21-30 | 70.0% | 213 | (7.1) | 56-264 | (4.7) | (25.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MIAMI OHIO 26.8, BOWLING GREEN 25.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2012 | @ OHIO ST | 10-56 | L | 25.5 | L | 50.5 | O | 20--1 | 32-54-313 | 3 | 53-294 | 19-33-244 | 0 | 9/8/2012 | S ILLINOIS | 30-14 | W | -20 | L | | - | 33-110 | 28-36-226 | 1 | 37-154 | 19-34-195 | 2 | 9/15/2012 | @ BOISE ST | 12-39 | L | 21 | L | 54 | U | 23-49 | 21-28-178 | 0 | 45-295 | 24-31-304 | 2 | 9/22/2012 | MASSACHUSETTS | 27-16 | W | -24 | L | 50.5 | U | 42-216 | 12-22-192 | 1 | 50-258 | 19-40-213 | 3 | 9/29/2012 | @ AKRON | 56-49 | W | -1.5 | W | 57 | O | 39-189 | 34-49-516 | 0 | 26-183 | 32-43-446 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | @ CINCINNATI | 14-52 | L | 19.5 | L | 58 | O | 19-59 | 27-53-320 | 4 | 50-272 | 13-23-157 | 0 | 10/13/2012 | @ BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ BUFFALO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | KENT ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2012 | @ FLORIDA | 14-27 | L | 28 | W | 47 | U | 27-101 | 25-52-226 | 2 | 42-220 | 13-21-145 | 1 | 9/8/2012 | IDAHO | 21-13 | W | -17 | L | 49.5 | U | 27-90 | 24-35-283 | 2 | 20-6 | 30-38-352 | 2 | 9/15/2012 | @ TOLEDO | 15-27 | L | 3 | L | 61 | U | 29-135 | 24-36-216 | 1 | 39-130 | 21-29-322 | 1 | 9/22/2012 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 0-37 | L | 17 | L | 47.5 | U | 26-133 | 14-42-133 | 2 | 43-246 | 12-29-150 | 1 | 9/29/2012 | RHODE ISLAND | 48-8 | W | -29.5 | W | | - | 39-206 | 24-34-332 | 1 | 32-96 | 12-22-75 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | @ AKRON | 24-10 | W | -5.5 | W | 59.5 | U | 44-292 | 14-33-180 | 1 | 26-88 | 29-50-228 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ MASSACHUSETTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/7/2012 | @ OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MIAMI OHIO: The RedHawks are one of many MAC teams returning most of their starters and they'll need the extra year of experience these guys got last season. Miami Ohio showed signs of the team they can be this season with a nice streak of wins in the middle of the year, but they ultimately pick and choose when they'd give their best effort too often. The offensive line is spotty and they'll need it to improve as they have a very talented QB in Zac Dysert (3,513 pass yds, 23 TD), but absolutely no running game. The RedHawks were the worst rushing team in the country last season (74 rush YPG). On the defensive end, Miami was very average, but a lot of that has to do with the unit being on the field for too long. This defense has playmakers in CB Dayonne Nunley (58 tackles, 3 INT) and DL Jason Semmes (4.5 sacks), so an improved running game on offense could help the defense out a whole lot. | | BOWLING GREEN: The Falcons are fortunate enough to be returning most of their starters from last year and that experience should be a major factor in the 2012 season. QB Matt Schilz (3,024 pass yds, 28 TD) has the talent to be one of the best players in the conference and he'll need to limit his mistakes to get the Falcons to turn over a new leaf. Sophomore RB Anthon Samuel (844 rush yds, 5 TD) is another player that could help take the Falcons' offense to a new level. The wide receiver position is an area of concern, but the protection Schilz will be getting from a solid offensive line should buy whoever is running routes some time to get open. Bowling Green had a major issue stopping the run last year, but with 10 starters returning on the defensive side of the ball, Dave Clawson has to be confident that the team's experience will help solve that problem. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:52:50 PM EST. |
|
|