| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
TCU W VIRGINIA |
|
| 131.5 | 85 Final 86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
551 | TCU | +13.5 | Over 127.5 | 552 | W VIRGINIA | -5.5 | Under 135.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 14-4 | +1.6 | 5-7 | 2-6 | 70.4 | 33.9 | 46.2% | 38.6 | 55.5 | 23.8 | 34.6% | 32.4 | Road Games | 4-1 | +4 | 3-2 | 0-5 | 59.8 | 26.2 | 42.5% | 34.0 | 51.0 | 21.0 | 32.4% | 32.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.4 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 57.8 | 24.6 | 39.7% | 33.4 | 62.0 | 25.4 | 36.5% | 39.4 | Conference Games | 1-4 | -3.4 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 57.8 | 24.6 | 39.7% | 33.4 | 62.0 | 25.4 | 36.5% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.4 | 33.9 | 24-53 | 46.2% | 5-14 | 33.7% | 17-27 | 61.3% | 39 | 12 | 14 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.4 | 31.8 | 24-54 | 43.6% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 66.3% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 59.8 | 26.2 | 19-46 | 42.5% | 3-12 | 24.1% | 18-28 | 64.5% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 55.5 | 23.8 | 18-51 | 34.6% | 4-12 | 31.1% | 16-25 | 65.1% | 32 | 10 | 8 | 23 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66 | 30.7 | 23-54 | 41.6% | 6-17 | 32.7% | 15-22 | 68.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 51.0 | 21.0 | 16-48 | 32.4% | 4-12 | 30.0% | 16-24 | 68.1% | 32 | 11 | 6 | 23 | 5 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-3 | +1 | 10-6 | 7-4 | 77.2 | 35.6 | 41.7% | 38.7 | 63.0 | 29.5 | 44.4% | 33.7 | Home Games | 6-2 | -4.5 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 77.9 | 36.6 | 39.6% | 41.0 | 59.4 | 28.9 | 43.7% | 32.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 72.8 | 32.4 | 38.6% | 38.0 | 70.0 | 32.4 | 43.9% | 37.4 | Conference Games | 3-2 | 0 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 72.8 | 32.4 | 38.6% | 38.0 | 70.0 | 32.4 | 43.9% | 37.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.2 | 35.6 | 27-65 | 41.7% | 6-20 | 30.4% | 17-26 | 66.5% | 39 | 15 | 15 | 22 | 13 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.9 | 23-56 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 14-20 | 67.6% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.9 | 36.6 | 26-67 | 39.6% | 7-23 | 28.8% | 18-26 | 71.5% | 41 | 17 | 16 | 19 | 13 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.0 | 29.5 | 21-47 | 44.4% | 6-16 | 34.6% | 16-24 | 67.2% | 34 | 8 | 11 | 23 | 5 | 22 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.5 | 33.2 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 34.1% | 14-20 | 67.9% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.4 | 28.9 | 20-46 | 43.7% | 5-15 | 36.1% | 14-19 | 69.9% | 32 | 6 | 11 | 22 | 5 | 21 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TCU 68.3, W VIRGINIA 74.3 |
| | |
|
|
12/9/2014 | FURMAN | 80-69 | W | -22.5 | L | | - | 28-47 | 59.6% | 25 | 9 | 23-45 | 51.1% | 24 | 15 | 12/13/2014 | MCNEESE ST | 68-50 | W | | - | | - | 26-60 | 43.3% | 49 | 11 | 17-57 | 29.8% | 32 | 9 | 12/20/2014 | TX-SAN ANTONIO | 88-57 | W | -16 | W | | - | 31-51 | 60.8% | 40 | 17 | 15-46 | 32.6% | 18 | 12 | 12/22/2014 | GRAMBLING | 80-36 | W | | - | | - | 28-58 | 48.3% | 43 | 15 | 10-45 | 22.2% | 34 | 21 | 12/29/2014 | TENNESSEE ST | 60-40 | W | -23 | L | | - | 23-59 | 39.0% | 50 | 11 | 14-44 | 31.8% | 29 | 14 | 1/3/2015 | W VIRGINIA | 67-78 | L | -1 | L | 127.5 | O | 19-44 | 43.2% | 33 | 18 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 43 | 14 | 1/7/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | 53-58 | L | 4.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 19-46 | 41.3% | 27 | 14 | 16-42 | 38.1% | 33 | 15 | 1/10/2015 | BAYLOR | 59-66 | L | -2 | L | 119 | O | 21-56 | 37.5% | 41 | 11 | 17-57 | 29.8% | 49 | 12 | 1/17/2015 | @ TEXAS TECH | 62-42 | W | -2.5 | W | 125.5 | U | 19-42 | 45.2% | 36 | 11 | 11-48 | 22.9% | 31 | 12 | 1/19/2015 | TEXAS | 48-66 | L | 2.5 | L | 120.5 | U | 18-54 | 33.3% | 30 | 8 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 41 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2015 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/7/2014 | @ N KENTUCKY | 67-42 | W | | - | | - | 23-59 | 39.0% | 46 | 12 | 13-49 | 26.5% | 38 | 20 | 12/14/2014 | *MARSHALL | 69-66 | W | -18 | L | | - | 22-57 | 38.6% | 36 | 15 | 19-38 | 50.0% | 26 | 24 | 12/20/2014 | *NC STATE | 83-69 | W | -2.5 | W | 139 | O | 31-58 | 53.4% | 28 | 14 | 20-36 | 55.6% | 26 | 23 | 12/22/2014 | WOFFORD | 77-44 | W | -12.5 | W | | - | 27-55 | 49.1% | 37 | 13 | 11-41 | 26.8% | 27 | 21 | 12/30/2014 | VIRGINIA TECH | 82-51 | W | -17 | W | 141.5 | U | 30-59 | 50.8% | 36 | 17 | 20-43 | 46.5% | 22 | 25 | 1/3/2015 | @ TCU | 78-67 | W | 1 | W | 127.5 | O | 28-66 | 42.4% | 43 | 14 | 19-44 | 43.2% | 33 | 18 | 1/5/2015 | @ TEXAS TECH | 78-67 | W | -6 | W | 134.5 | O | 30-63 | 47.6% | 35 | 8 | 19-46 | 41.3% | 35 | 22 | 1/10/2015 | IOWA ST | 72-74 | L | -4.5 | L | 150 | U | 22-68 | 32.4% | 38 | 9 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 40 | 18 | 1/13/2015 | OKLAHOMA | 86-65 | W | -4 | W | 141 | O | 30-68 | 44.1% | 42 | 9 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 35 | 22 | 1/17/2015 | @ TEXAS | 50-77 | L | 3 | L | 136 | U | 13-54 | 24.1% | 32 | 17 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 44 | 19 | 1/24/2015 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2015 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | TCU: After going 2-16 in the Big 12 in their first year in conference, The Horned Frogs were winless last season (0-18), leaving them nowhere to go but up during the 2014-2015 campaign. SG Kyan Anderson (17 PPG, 4.5 APG, 41% threes) is one of the more underrated players in college basketball. Anderson can light it up at any given moment, despite the opponents knowing he is the No. 1 option. With other players around him getting another year under their belts, Anderson should be able to see more one-on-one opportunities. PF Amric Fields (13.1 PPG, 6.1 RPG) and C Karviar Shepherd (9.1 PPG, 6.8 RPG and 1.6 BPG) are both players capable of taking some of the scoring load off Anderson's back, but this school has a long ways to go before it reaches respectability in the Big 12. | | W VIRGINIA: West Virginia had some big wins last season against Kansas and Kansas State, and has one of the top returning scorers in college basketball in combination G Juwan Staten (18.1 PPG, 5.8 APG and 5.6 RPG). Staten is nearly impossible to contain off the bounce, as he does a great job of finishing at the rim and drawing fouls (182-of-253, 72% from the free-throw line). For Staten, he will have to be even better this season as the No. 2 and No. 3 scorers for the Mountaineers are no longer on the team. PF Devin Williams (8.4 PPG, 7.2 RPG) is a guy that can get double-doubles on any given night, and he will have to do that for a West Virginia team that is going to struggle to score the ball. Head coach Bob Huggins always gets his teams to play hard, but to make a run at the NCAA Tournament, players like SG Gary Browne (5.9 PPG and 2.4 RPG) and JUCO transfer SG Jaysean Paige are going to have to play really well. |
| | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PA SPORTSTICKER COLLEGE BASKETBALL PREVIEW (TCU-WEST VIRGINIA) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*TCU-West Virginia Preview* ===========================
By JEFF BARTL STATS Senior Writer
TCU (14-4) at West Virginia (15-3), 2:00 p.m. EDT
West Virginia attempts to generate scoring by securing more possessions through turnovers forced with its full-court, high-pressure defense.
That becomes a moot point if its offense is giving the ball back at a similar rate.
The 18th-ranked Mountaineers look to avoid a third defeat in four games Saturday as they host a TCU team also looking to get back on track offensively.
West Virginia (15-3, 3-2 Big 12) leads the nation with 22.1 turnovers forced per contest, attempting to put opponents on their heels from the opening tip. It has continued to gain extra possessions at a high rate, but it hasn't been able to execute on the offensive end lately.
The Mountaineers forced 18 turnovers against then-No. 17 Iowa State on Jan. 10, but shot just 32.4 percent from the field in a 74-72 loss. After beating then-No. 18 Oklahoma 86-65 on Jan. 13, they shot 24.1 percent and turned it over a season high-tying 17 times in last Saturday's 77-50 loss to then-No. 20 Texas.
Leading scorer Juwan Staten has scored seven points while shooting 2 for 16 over his last two.
The 19 turnovers West Virginia forced against the Longhorns were negated as it was outrebounded 44-32 and had its worst shooting performance since a 20.0 percent mark in a loss to Cincinnati on Jan. 30, 2008.
"They imposed their will on us and we didn't respond to it very well," coach Bob Huggins said.
West Virginia's pressure defense often leads to personal fouls, as it ranks in the bottom 10 in the nation in fouls per game with 22.3. It committed a season-high 30 against Texas, as Jonathan Holton, Devin Williams and Jaysean Paige all fouled out.
"We weren't flat," Huggins said. "You could argue we weren't very smart. We just did dumb things. Jon Holton can't play eight minutes and we beat Texas. Can't do it. We need him on the floor."
Gary Browne was the only Mountaineer in double figures with 14 points, and he scored a season-high 16 as Staten sat out with an illness in a 78-67 win over TCU on Jan. 3.
That marked the first defeat of the season for the Horned Frogs (14-4, 1-4), who committed a season-worst 18 turnovers. They entered that contest shooting 48.5 percent from the field, but they've shot just 39.7 percent while dropping four of five.
TCU committed just eight turnovers to tie its fewest of the season but shot 33.3 percent in Monday's 66-48 loss to Texas.
"I just think this is one game where for the first time I just didn't like our effort," coach Trent Johnson said. "It's not a lot I liked out there. There will be more opportunities in this league."
Kyan Anderson, who scored 19 points in the first meeting with West Virginia, hit 1 of 5 from the field and was held to a season-low two points. Kenrich Williams was the only TCU player in double figures with 10.
"The thing I like about Kenrich is he can Michael Jordan and it won't dictate his approach," Johnson said. "That's the way he is in practice. He competes."
The Mountaineers have won each of the five all-time meetings between these schools.
|
| Last Updated: 9/21/2024 12:22:33 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|