| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
IOWA WISCONSIN |
|
| 124.5 | 70 Final 74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
797 | IOWA | +13 | Over 120.5 | 798 | WISCONSIN | -5 | Under 128.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 14-8 | -1 | 11-7 | 6-11 | 72.3 | 33.1 | 42.7% | 39.6 | 63.8 | 27.5 | 39.3% | 35.1 | Road Games | 3-6 | -2 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 67.3 | 29.9 | 39.8% | 35.6 | 71.3 | 30.7 | 44.2% | 36.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 66.0 | 26.8 | 36.9% | 37.6 | 66.4 | 25.2 | 43.4% | 36.0 | Conference Games | 3-6 | -2 | 5-4 | 3-6 | 65.7 | 27.4 | 39.2% | 36.8 | 67.6 | 27.1 | 43.0% | 37.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.3 | 33.1 | 25-58 | 42.7% | 5-18 | 30.0% | 17-25 | 70.6% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 29.7 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 12-18 | 67.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.3 | 29.9 | 23-57 | 39.8% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 16-23 | 68.4% | 36 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.8 | 27.5 | 23-59 | 39.3% | 6-19 | 28.8% | 12-17 | 71.2% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.8 | 31.4 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 14-20 | 69.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.3 | 30.7 | 25-57 | 44.2% | 5-18 | 28.5% | 16-22 | 72.3% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-7 | -3.2 | 7-13 | 6-10 | 67.2 | 32.1 | 43.2% | 36.3 | 55.6 | 25.1 | 40.5% | 31.5 | Home Games | 11-2 | -4.6 | 5-6 | 2-6 | 70.8 | 35.5 | 45.3% | 38.9 | 49.2 | 20.4 | 37.2% | 28.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 56.2 | 25.8 | 37.8% | 33.6 | 57.8 | 26.6 | 42.3% | 32.2 | Conference Games | 6-3 | +3.7 | 3-6 | 2-7 | 58.4 | 27.4 | 40.0% | 34.3 | 54.6 | 24.6 | 40.7% | 32.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.2 | 32.1 | 24-57 | 43.2% | 8-22 | 34.7% | 11-17 | 61.5% | 36 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 29.9 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 13-18 | 68.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.8 | 35.5 | 26-58 | 45.3% | 8-22 | 36.5% | 10-16 | 62.8% | 39 | 12 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 55.6 | 25.1 | 21-51 | 40.5% | 4-12 | 31.3% | 10-14 | 70.3% | 31 | 7 | 8 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 32.6 | 25-55 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 14-19 | 70.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 49.2 | 20.4 | 19-50 | 37.2% | 4-13 | 31.3% | 8-12 | 66.0% | 28 | 6 | 7 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: IOWA 73.8, WISCONSIN 75.5 |
| | |
|
|
12/19/2012 | S CAROLINA ST | 90-46 | W | -28 | W | 145.5 | U | 31-63 | 49.2% | 56 | 12 | 18-71 | 25.4% | 36 | 13 | 12/22/2012 | COPPIN ST | 80-50 | W | -21 | W | 146 | U | 31-60 | 51.7% | 54 | 20 | 19-65 | 29.2% | 29 | 19 | 12/31/2012 | INDIANA | 65-69 | L | 7 | W | 152.5 | U | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 46 | 15 | 1/6/2013 | @ MICHIGAN | 67-95 | L | 13.5 | L | 144.5 | O | 27-62 | 43.5% | 26 | 7 | 36-62 | 58.1% | 41 | 6 | 1/10/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | 59-62 | L | 2 | L | 136 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 35 | 18 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 36 | 12 | 1/13/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 70-50 | W | -1 | W | 133.5 | U | 29-63 | 46.0% | 43 | 9 | 15-51 | 29.4% | 33 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | WISCONSIN | 70-66 | W | 1 | W | 127.5 | O | 22-51 | 43.1% | 33 | 7 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 34 | 12 | 1/22/2013 | @ OHIO ST | 63-72 | L | 10 | W | 137.5 | U | 22-62 | 35.5% | 40 | 14 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 34 | 17 | 1/27/2013 | @ PURDUE | 62-65 | L | 2 | L | 137 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 42 | 10 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 45 | 8 | 1/31/2013 | PENN ST | 76-67 | W | -13 | L | 130.5 | O | 20-50 | 40.0% | 38 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 32 | 18 | 2/3/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 59-62 | L | 10 | W | 139.5 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 35 | 10 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 35 | 12 | 2/6/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2013 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/22/2012 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 74-53 | W | -26.5 | L | 124 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 8 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 21 | 13 | 12/29/2012 | SAMFORD | 87-51 | W | -29 | W | | - | 31-59 | 52.5% | 43 | 6 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 22 | 10 | 1/3/2013 | PENN ST | 60-51 | W | -18.5 | L | 124 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 32 | 4 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 38 | 15 | 1/6/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | 47-41 | W | -8.5 | L | 118 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 38 | 6 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 35 | 8 | 1/12/2013 | ILLINOIS | 74-51 | W | -6.5 | W | 128 | U | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 13 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 24 | 9 | 1/15/2013 | @ INDIANA | 64-59 | W | 10.5 | W | 133 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 28 | 8 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 37 | 11 | 1/19/2013 | @ IOWA | 66-70 | L | -1 | L | 127.5 | O | 25-58 | 43.1% | 34 | 12 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 33 | 7 | 1/22/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | 47-49 | L | -5 | L | 123 | U | 16-54 | 29.6% | 35 | 9 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 35 | 10 | 1/26/2013 | MINNESOTA | 45-44 | W | -3.5 | L | 123 | U | 17-46 | 37.0% | 35 | 10 | 16-46 | 34.8% | 29 | 9 | 1/29/2013 | @ OHIO ST | 49-58 | L | 6 | L | 119 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 26 | 9 | 23-45 | 51.1% | 32 | 10 | 2/3/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | 74-68 | W | -2 | W | 125.5 | O | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 9 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 32 | 9 | 2/6/2013 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2013 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/26/2013 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | IOWA: Fran McCaffery's Hawkeyes are another team that took a step forward last season, winning seven more games than the previous year and churning out eight Big Ten victories. Departed Matt Gatens carried that squad with 15.2 PPG, but the rest of the core is back with Roy Devyn Marble (11.5 PPG, 3.8 RPG, 3.6 APG) able to do it all, and sophomore forward Aaron White (11.7 PPG, 5.7 RPG) poised for more touches. 7-foot-1 freshman center Adam Woodbury will be a critical component joining White in the frontcourt, and fellow first-year point guard Mike Gesell should be key for helping Marble get more open looks. | | WISCONSIN: Head coach Bo Ryan's Badgers may not be able to match up to Indiana, Michigan, Michigan State and Ohio State in this year's Big Ten but they should be favored against the rest of the competition. Wisconsin's defense and slow tempo is legendary, holding opponents to a Division-I low 53.2 PPG, and that shouldn't change even without last year's leader Jordan Taylor, who had a team-high 14.8 PPG and 4.1 APG. Now it's time for Ryan Evans (11.0 PPG, 6.8 RPG) and Jared Berggren (10.5 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.7 BPG) to lead this team from the inside out. Despite standing at 6-foot-10 and playing center in a lot of Ryan's lineups, Berggren is also a threat on the perimeter, averaging 1.3 threes per game last year, where he will be especially needed considering sniper Josh Gasser, who played 34.1 MPG last year and nailed 45.2% of his shots from beyond the arc, is out for the year with a torn ACL. At 6-foot-7, freshman SF Sam Dekker will be a perfect addition to Ryan's style of play, giving this team a lengthy and flexible roster that should continue to play lockdown defense. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/6/2024 12:33:48 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|