| | | |
CALIFORNIA First Half Results WASHINGTON ST |
|
| 65.5 | 39 Final 37 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
567 | CALIFORNIA | 65.5 | 568 | WASHINGTON ST | -1.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 11-9 | -2.7 | 7-13 | 6-13 | 64.9 | 27.8 | 43.1% | 36.0 | 64.2 | 28.2 | 40.7% | 34.2 | Road Games | 3-3 | +0.5 | 2-4 | 1-5 | 61.0 | 28.2 | 39.4% | 37.3 | 64.5 | 29.8 | 38.8% | 39.7 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5.5 | 0-5 | 0-5 | 52.8 | 23.6 | 37.5% | 33.2 | 73.0 | 31.6 | 46.3% | 36.0 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -9.5 | 1-6 | 2-5 | 58.7 | 23.6 | 38.4% | 32.7 | 72.7 | 30.6 | 45.5% | 37.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.9 | 27.8 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 33.9% | 11-17 | 65.1% | 36 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65 | 30 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 61.0 | 28.2 | 23-59 | 39.4% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 9-16 | 60.6% | 37 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 4 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.2 | 28.2 | 22-55 | 40.7% | 5-15 | 31.5% | 15-22 | 69.1% | 34 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 5 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 14-21 | 69.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.5 | 29.8 | 22-57 | 38.8% | 4-13 | 28.7% | 16-23 | 70.5% | 40 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 9 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-10 | +5.5 | 8-10 | 10-3 | 70.7 | 32.6 | 43.0% | 34.0 | 75.5 | 35.4 | 46.2% | 35.3 | Home Games | 5-2 | -0.3 | 4-3 | 5-1 | 81.3 | 40.1 | 46.0% | 35.7 | 73.3 | 32.7 | 46.1% | 33.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +3.9 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 71.4 | 33.6 | 44.0% | 30.8 | 82.8 | 41.4 | 50.2% | 35.6 | Conference Games | 3-4 | +7.4 | 3-3 | 5-2 | 68.9 | 30.9 | 42.4% | 32.1 | 78.7 | 36.3 | 48.0% | 35.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.7 | 32.6 | 24-56 | 43.0% | 7-21 | 34.5% | 16-22 | 71.6% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.5 | 29.8 | 22-54 | 41.0% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.3 | 40.1 | 27-59 | 46.0% | 10-26 | 36.8% | 17-21 | 79.3% | 36 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.5 | 35.4 | 28-60 | 46.2% | 7-18 | 38.5% | 13-19 | 69.6% | 35 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 32.4 | 24-54 | 44.7% | 7-18 | 36.3% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.3 | 32.7 | 27-59 | 46.1% | 6-16 | 39.5% | 13-20 | 65.2% | 33 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CALIFORNIA 75.2, WASHINGTON ST 72.7 |
| | |
|
|
12/10/2014 | WYOMING | 45-42 | W | -4 | L | 118.5 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 32 | 8 | 15-46 | 32.6% | 33 | 12 | 12/13/2014 | PRINCETON | 67-57 | W | -10.5 | L | 125.5 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 29 | 9 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 24 | 16 | 12/19/2014 | E WASHINGTON | 78-67 | W | -5.5 | W | 140.5 | O | 27-47 | 57.4% | 36 | 11 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 23 | 7 | 12/22/2014 | WISCONSIN | 56-68 | L | 10 | L | 127 | U | 21-54 | 38.9% | 29 | 6 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 39 | 6 | 12/28/2014 | CS-BAKERSFIELD | 52-55 | L | -15.5 | L | 118 | U | 18-46 | 39.1% | 38 | 18 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 27 | 9 | 1/2/2015 | WASHINGTON | 81-75 | W | 1 | W | 125 | O | 26-61 | 42.6% | 29 | 4 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 42 | 12 | 1/4/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 66-69 | L | -9.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 22-58 | 37.9% | 34 | 9 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 38 | 10 | 1/7/2015 | @ USC | 57-71 | L | -2 | L | 130.5 | U | 23-65 | 35.4% | 37 | 13 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 40 | 8 | 1/11/2015 | @ UCLA | 54-73 | L | 6.5 | L | 135 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 34 | 16 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 40 | 6 | 1/14/2015 | STANFORD | 59-69 | L | 2 | L | 133 | U | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 9 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 34 | 8 | 1/22/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 44-79 | L | -2 | L | 126.5 | U | 15-45 | 33.3% | 29 | 19 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 11 | 1/24/2015 | ARIZONA | 50-73 | L | 12.5 | L | 128.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 25 | 19 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 31 | 14 | 1/29/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/10/2014 | @ GONZAGA | 66-81 | L | 22.5 | W | 143 | O | 25-48 | 52.1% | 23 | 15 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 36 | 12 | 12/13/2014 | @ SANTA CLARA | 67-76 | L | 4.5 | L | | - | 25-55 | 45.5% | 39 | 13 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 22 | 6 | 12/21/2014 | SAN JOSE ST | 82-53 | W | -22 | W | 124 | O | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 10 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 33 | 14 | 12/28/2014 | CAL DAVIS | 90-83 | W | -4.5 | W | 143 | O | 31-57 | 54.4% | 34 | 19 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 23 | 13 | 1/2/2015 | @ STANFORD | 56-71 | L | 15 | T | 139.5 | U | 14-42 | 33.3% | 33 | 9 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 37 | 6 | 1/4/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 69-66 | W | 9.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 23-55 | 41.8% | 38 | 10 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 34 | 9 | 1/10/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-77 | W | 11.5 | W | 137 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 10 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 31 | 9 | 1/15/2015 | OREGON | 108-99 | W | 3 | W | 147 | O | 33-56 | 58.9% | 35 | 12 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 36 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | OREGON ST | 47-62 | L | -2.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 14-48 | 29.2% | 22 | 10 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 37 | 10 | 1/21/2015 | @ UTAH | 64-86 | L | 18.5 | L | 136 | O | 21-46 | 45.7% | 35 | 17 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 30 | 4 | 1/24/2015 | @ COLORADO | 58-90 | L | 8.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 44 | 11 | 1/29/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2015 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | CALIFORNIA: The story of the Pac-12 this offseason has been two coaches, and the Golden Bears have a new leader in Cuonzo Martin. The school lost some talent from last season (Justin Cobbs and Richard Solomon), but still has a backcourt that can compete with any in the conference. PG Tyrone Wallace (11.3 PPG, 4.1 RPG, 2.7 APG) and SG Jabari Bird (8.3 PPG, 80% FT) are two talented guards who can get to the basket extremely well. Both players need to improve their long-range shooting, with both knocking down only 32% threes last season. If these two can score from the perimeter, that will allow PF David Kravish (11.4 PPG, 7.7 RPG, 2.1 BPG) to get one-on-one opportunities on the low block. | | WASHINGTON ST: The Cougars have a new coach in Ernie Kent, as the program is looking for anything to get things going back on the right track. If there is one positive, Washington State has one of the best players in the conference in SG DaVonte Lacy (19.4 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 39% threes). He is a complete scorer who can get to the rim, but can also catch fire from the outside as well. He was really the only scoring threat last season, and was able to put up those big numbers with defenses focusing on him. The other key WSU player is swingman Que Johnson (9.5 PPG, 2.4 RPG, 35% threes) who quietly had a solid season in the Pac-12 as a freshman. The weak spot on the team will be at the point, where Kent brought in three freshmen (Jackie Davis, Trevor Dunbar and Ny Redding) to compete with sophomore PG Ike Iroegbu (5.5 PPG, 1.5 APG in 18.1 MPG). Washington State also has to find some scoring from the frontcourt if it is going to be able to compete with the top teams in the conference. Forwards Dexter Kernich-Drew (6.3 PPG, 36% threes) and Junior Longrus (3.3 PPG, 3.5 RPG) need to make huge strides for the Cougars this season. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 12:12:55 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|