| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON WASHINGTON ST |
|
| 130 | 67 Final 72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
625 | WASHINGTON | +2 | Over 125 | 626 | WASHINGTON ST | +6 | Under 133 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 13-8 | +3.6 | 9-10 | 8-9 | 76.5 | 35.0 | 45.0% | 34.5 | 76.0 | 35.2 | 47.8% | 33.0 | Road Games | 2-6 | 0 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 69.9 | 33.7 | 42.3% | 34.4 | 77.5 | 34.5 | 47.5% | 36.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 72.2 | 29.0 | 44.8% | 31.2 | 74.4 | 34.6 | 47.0% | 34.8 | Conference Games | 5-3 | +6.6 | 5-2 | 2-6 | 69.7 | 30.7 | 45.0% | 32.0 | 70.6 | 31.2 | 44.7% | 34.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.5 | 35.0 | 26-58 | 45.0% | 6-16 | 35.1% | 18-24 | 75.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.1 | 32 | 24-56 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 15-21 | 69.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.9 | 33.7 | 25-60 | 42.3% | 5-16 | 34.9% | 14-19 | 72.2% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 21 | 5 | 11 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.0 | 35.2 | 28-58 | 47.8% | 5-16 | 31.9% | 16-23 | 69.4% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 73.7 | 34.1 | 25-56 | 45.6% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 17-24 | 70.5% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.5 | 34.5 | 27-57 | 47.5% | 4-13 | 30.6% | 19-26 | 73.6% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 5 | 10 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-12 | -5.4 | 6-10 | 4-10 | 62.0 | 27.7 | 41.3% | 33.0 | 65.0 | 30.7 | 44.3% | 33.1 | Home Games | 5-4 | -2.4 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 63.3 | 27.7 | 42.3% | 33.6 | 60.0 | 27.9 | 42.4% | 33.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.6 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 50.2 | 25.0 | 37.1% | 27.2 | 67.8 | 32.2 | 48.8% | 32.6 | Conference Games | 1-7 | -3.6 | 2-6 | 2-6 | 49.1 | 23.6 | 35.9% | 28.5 | 67.0 | 30.5 | 46.4% | 34.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 62.0 | 27.7 | 22-53 | 41.3% | 7-22 | 32.6% | 11-17 | 62.3% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 70.2 | 32.8 | 25-57 | 43.0% | 6-19 | 33.5% | 15-21 | 69.0% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 63.3 | 27.7 | 22-51 | 42.3% | 7-22 | 30.6% | 13-22 | 59.3% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.0 | 30.7 | 22-51 | 44.3% | 6-16 | 36.2% | 14-22 | 66.2% | 33 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 72.7 | 34.2 | 25-56 | 45.3% | 6-17 | 36.1% | 16-23 | 69.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 60.0 | 27.9 | 21-49 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-22 | 63.3% | 33 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 1 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 74.1, WASHINGTON ST 72.8 |
| | |
|
|
12/14/2013 | IDAHO ST | 85-66 | W | -11 | W | 148.5 | O | 32-58 | 55.2% | 31 | 13 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 21 | 14 | 12/17/2013 | @ TULANE | 73-62 | W | -7 | W | 152.5 | U | 22-46 | 47.8% | 37 | 18 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 27 | 12 | 12/22/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 70-82 | L | 5 | L | 145.5 | O | 24-54 | 44.4% | 27 | 16 | 28-51 | 54.9% | 29 | 15 | 12/27/2013 | MISS VALLEY ST | 95-80 | W | -22.5 | L | 165 | O | 33-61 | 54.1% | 51 | 16 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 29 | 11 | 12/29/2013 | HARTFORD | 73-67 | W | -11 | L | 146 | U | 20-45 | 44.4% | 23 | 7 | 24-43 | 55.8% | 23 | 14 | 1/2/2014 | @ ARIZONA ST | 76-65 | W | 10.5 | W | 152.5 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 13 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 34 | 11 | 1/4/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 62-71 | L | 17 | W | 143 | U | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 15 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 38 | 11 | 1/8/2014 | UTAH | 59-57 | W | -2 | T | 142.5 | U | 23-48 | 47.9% | 26 | 14 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 31 | 12 | 1/12/2014 | COLORADO | 71-54 | W | 3.5 | W | 146.5 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 30 | 13 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 38 | 20 | 1/15/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | 56-82 | L | 8 | L | 144.5 | U | 19-63 | 30.2% | 33 | 7 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 44 | 9 | 1/18/2014 | @ STANFORD | 67-79 | L | 10 | L | 144 | O | 28-65 | 43.1% | 34 | 6 | 26-48 | 54.2% | 33 | 7 | 1/23/2014 | OREGON | 80-76 | W | 2.5 | W | 159 | U | 26-45 | 57.8% | 25 | 11 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 32 | 10 | 1/25/2014 | OREGON ST | 87-81 | W | -3.5 | W | 153.5 | O | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 7 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 27 | 5 | 2/1/2014 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2014 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2014 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/15/2013 | PEPPERDINE | 78-61 | W | -9.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 30-56 | 53.6% | 39 | 9 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 34 | 15 | 12/18/2013 | *SAN FRANCISCO ST | 80-50 | W | | - | | - | 30-65 | 46.2% | 51 | 12 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 23 | 10 | 12/21/2013 | UTEP | 51-64 | L | -6.5 | L | 131 | U | 20-59 | 33.9% | 35 | 9 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 34 | 9 | 12/28/2013 | MISS VALLEY ST | 85-48 | W | -20 | W | 144.5 | U | 33-55 | 60.0% | 44 | 18 | 17-62 | 27.4% | 30 | 19 | 1/2/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 25-60 | L | 18 | L | 130.5 | U | 9-45 | 20.0% | 28 | 14 | 20-45 | 44.4% | 42 | 11 | 1/5/2014 | @ ARIZONA ST | 47-66 | L | 10 | L | 134 | U | 18-53 | 34.0% | 31 | 14 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 37 | 14 | 1/8/2014 | *COLORADO | 70-71 | L | 8.5 | W | 128 | O | 27-60 | 45.0% | 33 | 11 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 34 | 6 | 1/12/2014 | UTAH | 49-46 | W | 3 | W | 122.5 | U | 15-40 | 37.5% | 34 | 12 | 13-44 | 29.5% | 32 | 10 | 1/15/2014 | @ STANFORD | 48-80 | L | 13 | L | 128.5 | U | 20-54 | 37.0% | 23 | 12 | 30-52 | 57.7% | 37 | 9 | 1/18/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | 55-76 | L | 15 | L | 127.5 | O | 16-47 | 34.0% | 31 | 14 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 25 | 9 | 1/22/2014 | OREGON ST | 55-66 | L | 1.5 | L | 130 | U | 24-48 | 50.0% | 24 | 13 | 21-40 | 52.5% | 26 | 11 | 1/26/2014 | OREGON | 44-71 | L | 6.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 10-40 | 25.0% | 24 | 14 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 43 | 13 | 2/1/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2014 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2014 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | WASHINGTON: Lorenzo Romar is looking to get the Huskies back to the NCAA Tournament, and he has one of the most talented players in the conference on his side. SG C.J. Wilcox (16.8 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 37% 3-pt FG) is one of the top shooters in all of the country. He is able to shoot the ball off the dribble, as well as off the screen. However, he is not one-dimensional, as he is a very good defensive player as well. PF Shawn Kemp Jr. (6.3 PPG, 3.0 RPG, 53% FG) started to play much better as the season wore on, and will need to continue that improvement this season to give the Huskies a second option. Like his dad, Kemp Jr. is a big time leaper that could be a terrific rebounder, and he will be counted upon to dominate the glass. SF Desmond Simmons (4.9 PPG, 6.5 RPG) is also fierce on the boards and the team is very excited about freshman PG Nigel Williams-Goss who has the size (6-foot-4) and strength to control the game. | | WASHINGTON ST: The Cougars will have to replace standout forward Brock Motum, and a lot of his scoring will fall on the shoulders of junior SG Royce Woolridge. (11.0 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 2.7 APG) The former Kansas Jayhawk has found a nice home in Pullman, shooting 38 percent from deep last season, and will be given more shot opportunities now as he becomes the No. 1 option on offense. He is joined in the backcourt by PG DaVonte Lacy (10.5 PPG, 2.9 RPG, 2.0 APG). Like Woolridge, Lacy is a very talented shooter from deep (38% 3-pt FG) as he attempted 62 percent of his shots from behind the ar. The Cougars will rely on the three-ball this season as they do not have the inside presence that they did last season. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/9/2024 9:39:33 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|