|
|
RUTGERS VILLANOVA |
|
| 128.5 | 63 Final 71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
707 | RUTGERS | 130.5 | 130.5 | 708 | VILLANOVA | -9.5 | -10 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-11 | +2.3 | 9-12 | 3-2 | 66.4 | 31.3 | 44.2% | 34.6 | 66.8 | 29.0 | 42.0% | 33.5 | Road Games | 4-6 | -0.1 | 6-4 | 1-1 | 64.7 | 30.0 | 43.4% | 35.5 | 69.1 | 31.0 | 41.3% | 34.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 58.2 | 30.2 | 38.9% | 30.4 | 65.8 | 28.0 | 44.2% | 35.0 | Conference Games | 4-9 | -3.1 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 59.8 | 27.2 | 40.6% | 33.3 | 66.7 | 29.4 | 43.3% | 34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.4 | 31.3 | 24-54 | 44.2% | 5-14 | 35.3% | 13-19 | 71.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 13-19 | 69.1% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.7 | 30.0 | 23-54 | 43.4% | 5-15 | 37.4% | 12-17 | 73.5% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 21 | 8 | 17 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.8 | 29.0 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-20 | 31.1% | 15-21 | 70.1% | 33 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 31.9 | 25-57 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 13-20 | 68.6% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.1 | 31.0 | 23-57 | 41.3% | 6-20 | 29.9% | 16-24 | 68.1% | 35 | 11 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-10 | +4.6 | 16-7 | 7-9 | 68.8 | 32.7 | 41.6% | 37.7 | 65.1 | 28.6 | 39.5% | 33.2 | Home Games | 9-4 | +2.8 | 7-4 | 4-4 | 68.8 | 32.4 | 40.7% | 39.0 | 64.4 | 28.3 | 38.8% | 33.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 3-2 | 1-2 | 66.8 | 32.2 | 44.4% | 37.4 | 59.0 | 30.0 | 39.2% | 28.8 | Conference Games | 7-6 | +6.6 | 9-4 | 3-4 | 67.0 | 31.8 | 42.0% | 38.2 | 64.1 | 28.2 | 39.0% | 33.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.8 | 32.7 | 22-53 | 41.6% | 6-19 | 34.6% | 18-26 | 71.1% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 30.1 | 23-56 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 13-18 | 69.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 68.8 | 32.4 | 22-53 | 40.7% | 7-20 | 32.7% | 19-27 | 70.1% | 39 | 11 | 13 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.1 | 28.6 | 21-54 | 39.5% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 15-23 | 67.3% | 33 | 8 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.4 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 14-20 | 68.6% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 64.4 | 28.3 | 21-54 | 38.8% | 7-20 | 36.5% | 15-23 | 66.9% | 33 | 7 | 14 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: RUTGERS 75, VILLANOVA 76.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 53-78 | L | 15 | L | | - | 20-55 | 36.4% | 38 | 20 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 67-62 | W | 7 | W | 127 | O | 22-43 | 51.2% | 36 | 17 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 24 | 9 | 1/9/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 58-56 | W | 3.5 | W | | - | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 12 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 41 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | CINCINNATI | 58-68 | L | 5 | L | | - | 20-53 | 37.7% | 34 | 9 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 41 | 6 | 1/17/2013 | S FLORIDA | 70-67 | W | -4.5 | L | 124 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 32 | 6 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 28 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 66-69 | L | 12 | W | | - | 28-61 | 45.9% | 31 | 15 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 16 | 1/23/2013 | ST JOHNS | 60-72 | L | -4 | L | | - | 23-63 | 36.5% | 41 | 17 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 1/27/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 54-66 | L | 9 | L | | - | 22-56 | 39.3% | 33 | 16 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 1/30/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | 54-62 | L | 12 | W | | - | 18-48 | 37.5% | 27 | 21 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 35 | 17 | 2/6/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 48-68 | L | 12 | L | | - | 16-50 | 32.0% | 33 | 17 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 38 | 15 | 2/9/2013 | GEORGETOWN | 63-69 | L | 5 | L | | - | 21-54 | 38.9% | 28 | 8 | 27-47 | 57.4% | 29 | 11 | 2/12/2013 | SETON HALL | 57-55 | W | -4 | L | 130 | U | 18-46 | 39.1% | 34 | 12 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 35 | 14 | 2/16/2013 | @ DEPAUL | 69-75 | L | 1.5 | L | 145 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 30 | 13 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 38 | 12 | 2/18/2013 | @ VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/8/2013 | @ SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2013 | ST JOHNS | 98-86 | W | -7.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 47 | 18 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 61-53 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-55 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 32 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 61-72 | L | 14 | W | | - | 17-54 | 31.5% | 40 | 16 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 34 | 10 | 1/16/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 43-58 | L | 4.5 | L | 129 | U | 14-44 | 31.8% | 27 | 18 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 15 | 1/19/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 66-69 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 35 | 25 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 41 | 13 | 1/22/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 73-64 | W | 11.5 | W | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 34 | 19 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 34 | 17 | 1/26/2013 | SYRACUSE | 75-71 | W | 7 | W | 136.5 | O | 24-57 | 42.1% | 50 | 14 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 41 | 7 | 1/30/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 60-65 | L | 8 | W | 133.5 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 34 | 9 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 32 | 6 | 2/3/2013 | PROVIDENCE | 52-55 | L | -6 | L | | - | 14-51 | 27.5% | 38 | 18 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 33 | 21 | 2/5/2013 | @ DEPAUL | 94-71 | W | -3 | W | 145.5 | O | 34-57 | 59.6% | 33 | 13 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 27 | 16 | 2/9/2013 | S FLORIDA | 68-40 | W | -8.5 | W | 123 | U | 22-42 | 52.4% | 39 | 13 | 11-47 | 23.4% | 28 | 10 | 2/12/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | 50-68 | L | 7.5 | L | | - | 20-47 | 42.6% | 36 | 19 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 31 | 11 | 2/16/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 70-61 | W | 4.5 | W | 132.5 | U | 25-62 | 40.3% | 41 | 15 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 25 | 19 | 2/18/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/25/2013 | @ SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| RUTGERS: Even returning four starters, the Rutgers are long shots in this year's conference without bringing in any top freshmen. Last year's leading scorer, Eli Carter (13.8 PPG), will be the player to watch for the Scarlet Knights. Swingman Dane Miller (7.9 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 1.6 BPG, 1.3 SPG) is an asset defensively, though his offensive game leaves much to be desired. Guards Myles Mack (9.8 PPG, 34% 3-pt FG) and Jerome Seagears (7.7 PPG, 33% 3-pt FG) will have to shoot with greater accuracy for this team to be competitive. | | VILLANOVA: With three returning starters, Jay Wright has veteran talent to mold, but it remains to be seen if that talent is enough to compete in this deep conference. Last year's leading scorers, Maalik Wayns and Dominic Cheek and their combined 30.1 PPG are gone, leaving a huge scoring void in the Wildcats backcourt. C Mouphtaou Yarou (11.3 PPG, 8.2 RPG) is also back, and the pressure will be on that pair to give this team a chance this year. Wright has also done a solid job recruiting with point guard Ryan Arcidiacono and 6-foot-10 PF Daniel Ochefu both talented enough to play meaningful minutes. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/26/2024 11:17:27 AM EST. |
|
|