|
|
PENNSYLVANIA First Half Results VANDERBILT |
|
|
| 29 Final 40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
535 | PENNSYLVANIA | | 536 | VANDERBILT | -7.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-5 | -1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 66.5 | 34.0 | 46.2% | 37.0 | 66.4 | 32.2 | 41.0% | 29.7 | Road Games | 2-2 | -1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 66.0 | 36.5 | 48.9% | 36.2 | 64.0 | 31.2 | 39.6% | 28.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 64.6 | 36.2 | 47.2% | 38.0 | 59.6 | 27.8 | 36.1% | 28.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.5 | 34.0 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 13-20 | 66.2% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 17 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 70 | 33.7 | 25-55 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.0 | 36.5 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 5-15 | 35.6% | 16-23 | 71.4% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 21 | 6 | 19 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.4 | 32.2 | 22-53 | 41.0% | 7-22 | 32.8% | 15-22 | 70.1% | 30 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 64.5 | 30 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-20 | 32.0% | 13-18 | 69.9% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.0 | 31.2 | 22-55 | 39.6% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 13-20 | 64.2% | 28 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-3 | -0.6 | 4-3 | 4-1 | 73.2 | 35.2 | 50.5% | 35.2 | 62.1 | 28.4 | 39.2% | 31.4 | Home Games | 6-1 | +1.6 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 77.0 | 36.9 | 50.8% | 37.0 | 61.9 | 29.7 | 38.7% | 30.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.6 | 3-2 | 3-0 | 74.2 | 34.4 | 51.7% | 30.0 | 67.2 | 31.0 | 45.2% | 29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.2 | 35.2 | 25-50 | 50.5% | 7-17 | 39.2% | 16-23 | 71.5% | 35 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.7 | 31.6 | 23-54 | 42.5% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 15-22 | 67.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.0 | 36.9 | 26-51 | 50.8% | 7-18 | 40.6% | 18-25 | 71.3% | 37 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 4 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.1 | 28.4 | 22-57 | 39.2% | 5-18 | 29.5% | 12-18 | 64.6% | 31 | 11 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 67.1 | 31.8 | 24-56 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 14-21 | 66.3% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.9 | 29.7 | 22-56 | 38.7% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 13-20 | 63.8% | 30 | 10 | 10 | 22 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: PENNSYLVANIA 65.8, VANDERBILT 69.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/2014 | DELAWARE ST | 75-77 | L | | - | | - | 25-60 | 41.7% | 40 | 15 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 36 | 10 | 11/18/2014 | RIDER | 57-73 | L | 3 | L | | - | 23-54 | 42.6% | 32 | 14 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 32 | 12 | 11/22/2014 | LAFAYETTE | 77-83 | L | | - | | - | 32-64 | 50.0% | 34 | 14 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 26 | 12 | 11/25/2014 | @ TEMPLE | 67-76 | L | 12.5 | W | | - | 23-53 | 43.4% | 37 | 19 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 29 | 11 | 11/29/2014 | @ WAGNER | 61-64 | L | | - | | - | 19-33 | 57.6% | 29 | 22 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 23 | 10 | 12/3/2014 | @ NAVY | 57-46 | W | | - | | - | 21-45 | 46.7% | 36 | 16 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 31 | 14 | 12/6/2014 | @ BINGHAMTON | 79-70 | W | | - | | - | 26-51 | 51.0% | 43 | 18 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 30 | 10 | 12/9/2014 | MARIST | 59-42 | W | -11.5 | W | | - | 22-53 | 41.5% | 45 | 20 | 11-52 | 21.2% | 31 | 21 | 12/22/2014 | @ VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | @ LASALLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ PRINCETON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2015 | @ NIAGARA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/16/2014 | TREVECCA NAZAR | 83-56 | W | | - | | - | 28-56 | 50.0% | 53 | 16 | 19-65 | 29.2% | 29 | 12 | 11/20/2014 | LIPSCOMB | 72-62 | W | | - | | - | 27-59 | 45.8% | 43 | 11 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 37 | 9 | 11/23/2014 | TENNESSEE ST | 78-46 | W | -19 | W | 130.5 | U | 28-46 | 60.9% | 40 | 17 | 17-52 | 32.7% | 23 | 13 | 11/25/2014 | NORFOLK ST | 63-53 | W | | - | | - | 22-50 | 44.0% | 34 | 9 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 42 | 11 | 11/28/2014 | *RUTGERS | 65-68 | L | -5.5 | L | 127 | O | 24-50 | 48.0% | 32 | 14 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 38 | 8 | 11/29/2014 | *LASALLE | 68-55 | W | 2 | W | 123 | P | 26-48 | 54.2% | 31 | 7 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 26 | 10 | 12/4/2014 | BAYLOR | 63-66 | L | 1.5 | L | 119 | O | 21-48 | 43.7% | 30 | 14 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 33 | 14 | 12/13/2014 | PURDUE | 81-71 | W | 4 | W | 129 | O | 28-48 | 58.3% | 25 | 14 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 29 | 12 | 12/16/2014 | W CAROLINA | 99-79 | W | -10.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 26-47 | 55.3% | 34 | 18 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 18 | 14 | 12/20/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 60-65 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 21-45 | 46.7% | 30 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 39 | 7 | 12/22/2014 | PENNSYLVANIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | @ SAINT LOUIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | YALE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2015 | GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VANDERBILT: The Commodores had a great recruiting class, showing their program is taking the right steps to move up the standings in the conference. Everything for the team will start with sophomore C Damian Jones (11.3 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 1.4 BPG), who showed last season that he is ready to be the leader on the team. While it may still take a little while for this team to start producing a lot of wins, PG Shelton Mitchell, SG Riley LaChance and SF Matthew Fisher-Davis are among the projected freshmen starters who could be the cornerstone of this program in the next few seasons. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/8/2024 1:27:43 AM EST. |
|
|