|
|
OKLAHOMA TEXAS |
|
| 135 | 86 Final 92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
783 | OKLAHOMA | -2.5 | -2 | 784 | TEXAS | 131 | 133.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 18-8 | +7.3 | 15-7 | 9-5 | 69.9 | 33.6 | 43.7% | 37.0 | 64.5 | 29.5 | 40.7% | 35.1 | Road Games | 8-6 | +2.9 | 8-5 | 6-3 | 67.4 | 33.0 | 43.4% | 36.1 | 68.6 | 32.7 | 42.4% | 35.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.8 | 5-0 | 3-1 | 80.4 | 40.0 | 48.3% | 37.4 | 69.0 | 25.8 | 39.7% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 10-5 | +5.3 | 10-5 | 7-3 | 71.9 | 34.2 | 45.3% | 37.3 | 67.5 | 29.8 | 40.1% | 35.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 33.6 | 25-57 | 43.7% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 15-20 | 74.7% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.4 | 29.6 | 23-55 | 41.3% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 13-20 | 67.7% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.4 | 33.0 | 25-58 | 43.4% | 5-15 | 30.8% | 12-18 | 68.0% | 36 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.5 | 29.5 | 23-57 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 31.3% | 12-17 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.7 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 14-21 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.6 | 32.7 | 24-57 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 34.7% | 14-20 | 69.5% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-15 | -6.2 | 13-12 | 6-9 | 64.1 | 29.4 | 41.1% | 37.6 | 64.2 | 28.3 | 37.2% | 36.9 | Home Games | 10-4 | +0.8 | 6-6 | 1-2 | 67.0 | 31.6 | 42.7% | 38.7 | 58.6 | 25.8 | 33.3% | 36.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 66.4 | 27.0 | 41.4% | 35.4 | 74.2 | 31.8 | 41.8% | 38.6 | Conference Games | 4-10 | -6 | 8-6 | 4-4 | 64.3 | 27.6 | 42.0% | 34.7 | 69.7 | 30.9 | 40.6% | 37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.1 | 29.4 | 23-55 | 41.1% | 5-17 | 27.8% | 14-22 | 63.9% | 38 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.1 | 30.6 | 23-56 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 67.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 67.0 | 31.6 | 23-54 | 42.7% | 5-17 | 29.3% | 16-24 | 64.5% | 39 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.2 | 28.3 | 21-57 | 37.2% | 5-18 | 27.7% | 17-24 | 70.7% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.3 | 31.9 | 24-57 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 14-20 | 69.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.6 | 25.8 | 19-59 | 33.3% | 5-20 | 25.4% | 14-21 | 68.4% | 37 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 9 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA 76.7, TEXAS 76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/12/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | 77-68 | W | -2 | W | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 37 | 13 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 36 | 15 | 1/16/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 81-63 | W | -15.5 | W | | - | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 9 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 14 | 1/19/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 60-69 | L | 7.5 | L | | - | 25-53 | 47.2% | 39 | 16 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 25 | 8 | 1/21/2013 | TEXAS | 73-67 | W | -7.5 | L | 129.5 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 13 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 15 | 1/26/2013 | @ KANSAS | 54-67 | L | 12.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 31 | 11 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 41 | 14 | 1/30/2013 | @ BAYLOR | 74-71 | W | 6.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 29-55 | 52.7% | 34 | 16 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 47 | 14 | 2/2/2013 | KANSAS ST | 50-52 | L | -2.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 38 | 14 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 34 | 10 | 2/4/2013 | @ IOWA ST | 64-83 | L | 5.5 | L | 143.5 | O | 26-71 | 36.6% | 42 | 9 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 33 | 10 | 2/9/2013 | KANSAS | 72-66 | W | 5.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 35 | 11 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 35 | 13 | 2/11/2013 | TCU | 75-48 | W | -15.5 | W | 123.5 | U | 29-58 | 50.0% | 34 | 7 | 16-53 | 30.2% | 35 | 16 | 2/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 79-84 | L | 9 | W | | - | 29-61 | 47.5% | 41 | 9 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 36 | 5 | 2/20/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | 86-71 | W | -9.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 32-60 | 53.3% | 39 | 13 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 29 | 10 | 2/23/2013 | BAYLOR | 90-76 | W | -4.5 | W | 143 | O | 22-49 | 44.9% | 38 | 16 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 37 | 12 | 2/27/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/9/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 53-57 | L | -4.5 | L | 128 | U | 19-55 | 34.5% | 39 | 14 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 45 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ IOWA ST | 62-82 | L | 9 | L | 139 | O | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 11 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 5 | 1/19/2013 | KANSAS | 59-64 | L | 9.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 25-56 | 44.6% | 29 | 14 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 36 | 15 | 1/21/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 67-73 | L | 7.5 | W | 129.5 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 13 | 1/26/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 73-57 | W | -11 | W | | - | 25-54 | 46.3% | 30 | 10 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 36 | 19 | 1/30/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 57-83 | L | 9.5 | L | 122 | O | 19-46 | 41.3% | 30 | 18 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 34 | 6 | 2/2/2013 | TCU | 60-43 | W | -12 | W | | - | 23-44 | 52.3% | 30 | 11 | 17-52 | 32.7% | 33 | 13 | 2/4/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | 58-60 | L | 5.5 | W | 125.5 | U | 21-60 | 35.0% | 36 | 15 | 18-39 | 46.2% | 29 | 16 | 2/9/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | 59-72 | L | 3.5 | L | | - | 23-59 | 39.0% | 34 | 15 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 46 | 17 | 2/13/2013 | IOWA ST | 89-86 | W | 0 | W | | - | 31-61 | 50.8% | 43 | 18 | 28-80 | 35.0% | 41 | 8 | 2/16/2013 | @ KANSAS | 47-73 | L | 14.5 | L | 133 | U | 12-55 | 21.8% | 42 | 16 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 41 | 14 | 2/19/2013 | @ TCU | 68-59 | W | -5.5 | W | | - | 24-48 | 50.0% | 27 | 9 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 31 | 10 | 2/23/2013 | KANSAS ST | 69-81 | L | 3.5 | L | | - | 23-50 | 46.0% | 31 | 12 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 34 | 13 | 2/27/2013 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2013 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OKLAHOMA: In his second year with the Sooners, Lon Kruger will have a team returning all five starters from last year's campaign. With three returning double-digit scorers, the question is if Kruger can guide this team that won just 15 games last season to a more respectable finish. SG Steven Pledger (16.2 PPG, 42% 3-pt FG) is the best of that crew, while forwards Romero Osby (12.9 PPG, 7.3 RPG) and Andrew Fitzgerald (12.1 PPG, 5.0 RPG) will look to form a solid frontcourt that can hopefully help this team eclipse the .500 mark. | | TEXAS: Assuming Myck Kabongo is eligible to play this season (NCAA violations), this is a Rick Barnes squad that has the potential to be dangerous if it finds its groove. But Kabongo (9.6 PPG, 5.2 APG) will have to bear a heavy load, replacing the production of J'Covan Brown, who carried the team last year with 20.1 PPG. Kabongo and Sheldon McClellan (11.3 PPG) should form a potent backcourt duo, but the question is if they will be able to battle on the blocks. Six-foot-10 center Cameron Ridley is a top-10 recruit, but he should take time to develop and will have a heavy load to bear from day one. The McDonald's All-American will be joined in the post by another first-year player standing 6-foot-10, Prince Ibeh, who should actually complement Ridley well as a more athletic post player who plays excellent defense. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/7/2024 11:49:48 PM EST. |
|
|