| | | |
ARIZONA ST STANFORD |
|
| 145 | 70 Final 76 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
611 | ARIZONA ST | +175 | 612 | STANFORD | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 16-5 | +0.5 | 11-8 | 5-10 | 77.2 | 36.2 | 47.0% | 36.8 | 66.4 | 30.8 | 40.8% | 36.8 | Road Games | 5-4 | +0.5 | 5-4 | 3-5 | 74.3 | 34.0 | 44.2% | 35.7 | 73.1 | 34.7 | 42.8% | 39.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.1 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 76.0 | 34.8 | 45.2% | 33.4 | 76.4 | 37.2 | 47.9% | 34.8 | Conference Games | 5-3 | -0.9 | 4-4 | 3-4 | 73.7 | 33.5 | 44.1% | 35.0 | 70.6 | 34.6 | 44.6% | 35.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.2 | 36.2 | 26-56 | 47.0% | 8-21 | 40.4% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 37 | 7 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.3 | 31.9 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 34.2% | 14-21 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.3 | 34.0 | 25-58 | 44.2% | 8-20 | 38.0% | 16-24 | 67.5% | 36 | 7 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.4 | 30.8 | 24-60 | 40.8% | 5-17 | 30.3% | 13-21 | 61.5% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.4 | 33.3 | 25-56 | 44.9% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 15-22 | 69.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.1 | 34.7 | 26-61 | 42.8% | 5-16 | 34.3% | 15-24 | 64.2% | 40 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-7 | +1.6 | 11-6 | 9-8 | 75.9 | 35.5 | 47.6% | 36.5 | 69.7 | 33.5 | 41.3% | 33.4 | Home Games | 8-3 | -1.2 | 7-2 | 3-6 | 79.5 | 39.5 | 50.3% | 37.2 | 66.5 | 32.5 | 39.6% | 32.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 73.8 | 35.0 | 45.3% | 37.8 | 67.4 | 33.0 | 42.6% | 33.2 | Conference Games | 4-4 | -0.8 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 73.1 | 34.9 | 45.2% | 36.1 | 70.9 | 34.5 | 44.1% | 33.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.9 | 35.5 | 26-56 | 47.6% | 6-16 | 39.7% | 17-24 | 69.8% | 37 | 8 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.3 | 32.2 | 24-57 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.5 | 39.5 | 28-56 | 50.3% | 7-16 | 41.7% | 16-24 | 68.7% | 37 | 8 | 14 | 17 | 4 | 11 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.7 | 33.5 | 24-58 | 41.3% | 7-19 | 35.9% | 15-21 | 70.8% | 33 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 73.7 | 34.5 | 26-56 | 45.8% | 6-18 | 35.9% | 16-22 | 71.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.5 | 32.5 | 24-61 | 39.6% | 7-19 | 34.3% | 12-17 | 69.9% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ARIZONA ST 72.7, STANFORD 77.2 |
| | |
|
|
12/14/2013 | GRAMBLING | 97-55 | W | | - | | - | 40-63 | 63.5% | 44 | 11 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 30 | 14 | 12/21/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 76-62 | W | -11.5 | W | 139 | U | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 7 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 45 | 12 | 12/28/2013 | UC-IRVINE | 74-61 | W | -8.5 | W | 144 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 34 | 11 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 44 | 19 | 1/2/2014 | WASHINGTON | 65-76 | L | -10.5 | L | 152.5 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 34 | 11 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 13 | 1/5/2014 | WASHINGTON ST | 66-47 | W | -10 | W | 134 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 37 | 14 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 31 | 14 | 1/9/2014 | @ USC | 79-60 | W | -3.5 | W | 149.5 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 42 | 13 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 42 | 16 | 1/12/2014 | @ UCLA | 72-87 | L | 6 | L | 159 | P | 24-56 | 42.9% | 29 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 42 | 10 | 1/16/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 68-91 | L | 14 | L | 133 | O | 18-53 | 34.0% | 30 | 18 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 39 | 11 | 1/23/2014 | UTAH | 79-75 | W | -5 | L | 135.5 | O | 26-49 | 53.1% | 33 | 11 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 30 | 12 | 1/25/2014 | COLORADO | 72-51 | W | -5 | W | 142.5 | U | 23-47 | 48.9% | 36 | 16 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 31 | 19 | 1/29/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | 89-78 | W | 6.5 | W | 145.5 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 39 | 13 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 32 | 10 | 2/1/2014 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2014 | OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2014 | ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2014 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/14/2013 | CAL DAVIS | 83-56 | W | -22 | W | 151.5 | U | 31-53 | 58.5% | 35 | 12 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 32 | 14 | 12/18/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 53-51 | W | 7 | W | 144.5 | U | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 8 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 41 | 8 | 12/21/2013 | *MICHIGAN | 65-68 | L | 3 | T | 143.5 | U | 22-48 | 45.8% | 32 | 12 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 32 | 8 | 12/29/2013 | CAL POLY-SLO | 79-62 | W | -13 | W | 131 | O | 25-43 | 58.1% | 32 | 10 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 32 | 8 | 1/2/2014 | CALIFORNIA | 62-69 | L | -6 | L | 141 | U | 24-58 | 41.4% | 35 | 11 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 37 | 12 | 1/9/2014 | @ OREGON ST | 72-81 | L | -1 | L | 146.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 33 | 10 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 38 | 12 | 1/12/2014 | @ OREGON | 82-80 | W | 5.5 | W | 156.5 | O | 30-57 | 52.6% | 32 | 7 | 24-46 | 52.2% | 26 | 15 | 1/15/2014 | WASHINGTON ST | 80-48 | W | -13 | W | 128.5 | U | 30-52 | 57.7% | 37 | 9 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 23 | 12 | 1/18/2014 | WASHINGTON | 79-67 | W | -10 | W | 144 | O | 26-48 | 54.2% | 33 | 7 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 34 | 6 | 1/23/2014 | @ UCLA | 74-91 | L | 6 | L | 154.5 | O | 22-57 | 38.6% | 42 | 19 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 33 | 6 | 1/26/2014 | @ USC | 79-71 | W | -6.5 | W | 147 | O | 25-61 | 41.0% | 39 | 14 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 40 | 15 | 1/29/2014 | ARIZONA | 57-60 | L | 5.5 | W | 134 | U | 21-56 | 37.5% | 38 | 7 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 36 | 8 | 2/1/2014 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2014 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | ARIZONA ST: Herb Sendek has the Sun Devils program on the rise, making it to the NIT semifinals last season before falling to Baylor. With only two starters back, there are questions on whether or not Arizona State can take it to the next level and reach the NCAA Tournament. However, star PG Jahii Carson (18.5 PPG, 5.1 APG, 3.7 RPG) has the ability to carry this team on his back a long way. He is one of the most complete point guards in all of the country, with the ability to both score the ball as well as set up teammates for easy baskets. Joining him in the backcourt will be Penn State transfer Jermaine Marshall (15.3 PPG) who can score in bunches. SF Jonathan Gilling (9.7 PPG, 6.1 RPG, 37% 3-pt FG) is a strong shooter from downtown, and 7-foot-2 Senior C Jordan Bachysnki (9.8 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 3.4 BPG) is outstanding at the rim, setting a Pac-12 record with 120 blocks last season. If he steps up his offensive game to become a consistent 12-to-15 point scorer, Arizona State will be tough to beat. | | STANFORD: The Cardinal will look to right the ship in the sixth season under head coach Johnny Dawkins, and they will count on junior SG Chasson Randle (13.6 PPG, 2.6 APG, 36% 3-pt FG) to help them take the next step. Randle can score in bunches, and is not afraid to take the ball in among the big men. Stanford also has a star in the frontcourt in PF Dwight Powell (14.9, PPG, 8.4 RPG, 46% 3-pt FG), who is a terrific offensive player, that is able to score from anywhere on the court. However, it is his work on the glass that makes him such an important player. He is absolutely relentless on the boards, constantly outworking opponents to get the rebound, and so is and senior SF Josh Huestis (10.5 PPG, 9.0 RPG). Senior PG Aaron Bright (9.3 PPG, 3.4 APG) is a heady floor general but he needs to find his outside stroke, shooting just 32% on threes last season, after knocking down 44% 3-pt FG as a sophomore. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:36:01 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|