| | | |
IOWA RUTGERS |
|
| 142.5 | 64 Final 80 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
741 | IOWA | 142 | -1 | 742 | RUTGERS | -1 | 142 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 10-9 | -8.7 | 6-7 | 10-5 | 81.9 | 39.6 | 48.3% | 40.3 | 76.2 | 36.9 | 44.0% | 33.7 | Road Games | 4-6 | -5.6 | 4-5 | 7-3 | 78.2 | 36.1 | 46.3% | 39.9 | 81.0 | 39.1 | 46.0% | 33.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.3 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 84.8 | 41.8 | 49.5% | 35.8 | 86.0 | 45.6 | 50.0% | 32.0 | Conference Games | 1-5 | -3.4 | 1-4 | 4-2 | 77.2 | 35.5 | 46.3% | 37.5 | 84.8 | 46.0 | 48.6% | 33.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.9 | 39.6 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 8-21 | 37.9% | 16-23 | 68.1% | 40 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 73.3 | 34.1 | 26-59 | 44.0% | 8-22 | 35.1% | 14-20 | 70.4% | 35 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.2 | 36.1 | 28-61 | 46.3% | 7-21 | 35.5% | 14-20 | 69.1% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 5 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 36.9 | 28-64 | 44.0% | 8-23 | 34.1% | 12-17 | 72.0% | 34 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 76.5 | 36.1 | 27-59 | 45.3% | 7-21 | 35.9% | 15-21 | 72.6% | 37 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.0 | 39.1 | 29-64 | 46.0% | 8-23 | 33.9% | 14-19 | 74.4% | 34 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-8 | +4.4 | 7-3 | 4-7 | 68.9 | 31.8 | 40.8% | 41.8 | 62.1 | 28.8 | 38.7% | 37.6 | Home Games | 11-5 | +5.4 | 6-1 | 2-6 | 70.0 | 32.7 | 41.9% | 42.7 | 58.2 | 26.7 | 37.5% | 36.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +0.4 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 58.2 | 23.6 | 36.6% | 31.8 | 69.2 | 31.2 | 46.3% | 39.6 | Conference Games | 1-5 | -0.6 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 58.7 | 24.7 | 34.2% | 35.5 | 72.8 | 33.0 | 45.0% | 41.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.9 | 31.8 | 26-63 | 40.8% | 5-16 | 29.6% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 42 | 12 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 72.2 | 34.5 | 26-59 | 43.7% | 7-22 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.0 | 32.7 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 30.6% | 13-21 | 60.2% | 43 | 13 | 11 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.1 | 28.8 | 22-57 | 38.7% | 6-21 | 30.7% | 11-17 | 67.5% | 38 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 71.9 | 34.2 | 26-59 | 44.0% | 8-23 | 33.8% | 13-18 | 69.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.2 | 26.7 | 22-58 | 37.5% | 6-21 | 28.5% | 9-14 | 64.5% | 37 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: IOWA 75.4, RUTGERS 74.2 |
| | |
|
|
11/28/2017 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 55-79 | L | 8.5 | L | 165 | U | 22-66 | 33.3% | 44 | 14 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 40 | 10 | 12/2/2017 | PENN ST | 73-77 | L | 4 | T | 152 | U | 28-55 | 50.9% | 39 | 18 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 30 | 14 | 12/4/2017 | @ INDIANA | 64-77 | L | 6 | L | 152 | U | 25-65 | 38.5% | 42 | 18 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 47 | 10 | 12/7/2017 | @ IOWA ST | 78-84 | L | 6 | T | 153 | O | 33-74 | 44.6% | 53 | 18 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 31 | 8 | 12/10/2017 | SOUTHERN U | 91-60 | W | | - | | - | 28-63 | 44.4% | 46 | 7 | 21-70 | 30.0% | 45 | 11 | 12/16/2017 | *DRAKE | 90-64 | W | -7 | W | 151.5 | O | 37-67 | 55.2% | 41 | 14 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 24 | 19 | 12/19/2017 | SOUTHERN UTAH | 92-64 | W | -15.5 | W | 167.5 | U | 35-67 | 52.2% | 48 | 12 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 29 | 12 | 12/22/2017 | *COLORADO | 80-73 | W | -3.5 | W | 151 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 43 | 19 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 31 | 11 | 12/29/2017 | N ILLINOIS | 98-75 | W | -15 | W | 151.5 | O | 36-62 | 58.1% | 35 | 8 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 35 | 12 | 1/2/2018 | MICHIGAN | 68-75 | L | 2.5 | L | 142.5 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 31 | 13 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 30 | 10 | 1/4/2018 | OHIO ST | 81-92 | L | 1 | L | 151 | O | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 11 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 38 | 9 | 1/7/2018 | @ MARYLAND | 73-91 | L | 7 | L | 150 | O | 28-57 | 49.1% | 28 | 17 | 34-60 | 56.7% | 31 | 9 | 1/11/2018 | @ ILLINOIS | 104-97 | W | 4.5 | W | 154 | O | 32-64 | 50.0% | 45 | 17 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 26 | 14 | 1/17/2018 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/20/2018 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2018 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2018 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2018 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2018 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/28/2017 | FLORIDA ST | 73-78 | L | 5 | T | 139 | O | 26-64 | 40.6% | 41 | 14 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 36 | 9 | 12/3/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 67-89 | L | 12 | L | 140 | O | 24-74 | 32.4% | 43 | 14 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 46 | 14 | 12/5/2017 | MICHIGAN ST | 52-62 | L | 14.5 | W | 136.5 | U | 17-66 | 25.8% | 45 | 10 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 45 | 15 | 12/7/2017 | NEW JERSEY TECH | 73-64 | W | | - | | - | 29-50 | 58.0% | 40 | 19 | 23-75 | 30.7% | 42 | 12 | 12/9/2017 | FARLEIGH DICKINSON | 92-54 | W | | - | | - | 33-62 | 53.2% | 49 | 13 | 19-59 | 32.2% | 30 | 15 | 12/12/2017 | FORDHAM | 75-63 | W | -11 | W | 125.5 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 45 | 14 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 27 | 16 | 12/16/2017 | SETON HALL | 71-65 | W | 8.5 | W | 143 | U | 23-67 | 34.3% | 46 | 8 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 46 | 18 | 12/22/2017 | STONY BROOK | 73-75 | L | | - | | - | 29-65 | 44.6% | 41 | 14 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 48 | 16 | 12/28/2017 | HARTFORD | 58-60 | L | | - | | - | 20-58 | 34.5% | 34 | 6 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 39 | 17 | 1/3/2018 | @ PURDUE | 51-82 | L | 19.5 | L | 138 | U | 20-60 | 33.3% | 27 | 11 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 45 | 16 | 1/5/2018 | WISCONSIN | 64-60 | W | 3.5 | W | 124.5 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 28 | 6 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 32 | 14 | 1/10/2018 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 72-76 | L | 22 | W | 135 | O | 27-67 | 40.3% | 40 | 12 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 36 | 13 | 1/14/2018 | OHIO ST | 46-68 | L | 6 | L | 136 | U | 17-59 | 28.8% | 30 | 5 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 46 | 11 | 1/17/2018 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2018 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/24/2018 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2018 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2018 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2018 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2018 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | IOWA: Last season: 19-15.
Who's gone: G Peter Jok.
Who's back: Everybody else, including PG Jordan Bohannon. He averaged nearly 11 points a game last season as a freshman and finished with three straight double-doubles in postseason play. F Tyler Cook (12.3 points, 5.3 rebounds) was up and down as a newcomer a year ago but could emerge as one of the Big Ten's breakout stars. F Nicholas Baer was the league's Sixth Man of the Year in 2016-17, but it's uncertain if he will move into the starting lineup.
Who's new: C Luka Garza, a freshman, was Iowa's best player during a summer tour through Europe and is expected to start. C Jack Nunge, also a freshman, should also see extended minutes in the Hawkeyes' rebuilt frontcourt.
The Skinny: Iowa will miss Jok's 19.9 points per game. But If Bohannon and Cook improve as expected and Garza and Nunge solidify the frontcourt, Iowa will likely make a push for a top-five league finish and return to the NCAA Tournament. The Hawkeyes have as many as 12 guys who can play at the Division I level, and McCaffery will have his hands full keeping everyone happy. | | RUTGERS: Last season: 15-18, ties most wins since 2012-13.
Who's gone: C C.J. Gettys, G Nigel Johnson (graduate transfer, Virginia), F Jonathan Laurent, G Khalil Batie, C Ibrahima Diallo.
Who's back: G Corey Sanders. The junior led the Scarlet Knights with team-high 12.8; F Deshawn Freeman. Athletic senior averaged 11.1 points in 33 games; G Mike Williams. The streaky shooting guard averaged 9.4 points. Fs Candido Sa, Issa Thiam, Shaquille Doorson and Eugene Omoruyi all played in 30-plus games last season but were minor contributors.
Who's new: G Soug Mensah. Junior college transfer will provide depth at guard. Freshmen F Mamadou Doucoure and C Myles Johnson give Rutgers big bodies up front. The 6-foot-9 Doucoure averaged 11 points, 14 rebounds and 3.0 blocks as a senior at Our Savior New American School on Long Island. The 6-10 Johnson played at Long Beach (California) Polytechnic High School. He had eight points, 10 rebounds and seven blocks against a nationally-ranked Chino Hills in the playoffs. Freshman G Geo Baker will get playing time.
The Skinny: Rutgers has not been to the NCAA Tournament since 1991, the year Pikiell started his coaching career as an assistant at Connecticut. The Scarlet Knights have been picked to finish last in the conference. Getting more than three conference wins the season would be an improvement. Making the NIT for the first time since 2006 would be a major success. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 12:30:42 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|