|
|
OAKLAND PITTSBURGH |
|
|
| 77 Final 81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
545 | OAKLAND | | 546 | PITTSBURGH | N.L. |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-7 | -0.6 | 4-5 | 2-0 | 74.3 | 33.7 | 45.9% | 32.7 | 79.9 | 37.1 | 48.0% | 35.2 | Road Games | 1-4 | +1.1 | 2-3 | 2-0 | 70.8 | 33.2 | 44.1% | 30.0 | 87.6 | 39.0 | 50.7% | 40.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.1 | 2-2 | 2-0 | 72.0 | 32.6 | 47.2% | 31.6 | 77.4 | 34.4 | 46.4% | 34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.3 | 33.7 | 25-55 | 45.9% | 8-23 | 36.1% | 15-23 | 66.0% | 33 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.4 | 31.5 | 23-54 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 15-21 | 69.3% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.8 | 33.2 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 6-21 | 30.5% | 15-23 | 65.5% | 30 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 6 | 14 | 1 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.9 | 37.1 | 28-58 | 48.0% | 8-20 | 39.1% | 16-23 | 70.5% | 35 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 70.7 | 33.7 | 25-56 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 14-21 | 67.6% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 87.6 | 39.0 | 31-60 | 50.7% | 8-19 | 40.9% | 19-29 | 64.8% | 41 | 11 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 10 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-3 | -5.8 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 68.7 | 33.6 | 45.2% | 35.9 | 61.7 | 30.0 | 42.7% | 29.3 | Home Games | 4-0 | +2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 66.0 | 31.7 | 48.7% | 32.5 | 52.7 | 22.7 | 34.8% | 31.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.7 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 67.6 | 31.2 | 44.3% | 34.4 | 60.0 | 29.0 | 41.9% | 34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.7 | 33.6 | 25-55 | 45.2% | 6-15 | 36.4% | 13-19 | 69.6% | 36 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 70.1 | 33.1 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 35.1% | 16-22 | 70.1% | 36 | 11 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.0 | 31.7 | 24-50 | 48.7% | 4-10 | 38.5% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 32 | 6 | 18 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.7 | 30.0 | 22-51 | 42.7% | 5-18 | 30.7% | 12-18 | 69.4% | 29 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.5 | 32.7 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 15-23 | 66.5% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 52.7 | 22.7 | 17-50 | 34.8% | 4-16 | 25.8% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 31 | 8 | 7 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OAKLAND 74.2, PITTSBURGH 70.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | @ IOWA ST | 82-93 | L | 19.5 | W | | - | 29-56 | 51.8% | 29 | 13 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 8 | 11/17/2014 | @ E MICHIGAN | 77-89 | L | 4 | L | | - | 27-61 | 44.3% | 36 | 14 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 45 | 9 | 11/19/2014 | W MICHIGAN | 71-82 | L | -2 | L | | - | 24-55 | 43.6% | 29 | 14 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 29 | 15 | 11/24/2014 | W CAROLINA | 79-88 | L | -6 | L | | - | 23-57 | 40.4% | 37 | 17 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 14 | 11/25/2014 | CHICAGO ST | 70-57 | W | -13 | T | | - | 23-51 | 45.1% | 38 | 10 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 38 | 12 | 11/26/2014 | GEORGIA ST | 78-83 | L | 8.5 | W | | - | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 11 | 29-46 | 63.0% | 25 | 10 | 11/29/2014 | TOLEDO | 81-79 | W | 6 | W | | - | 27-49 | 55.1% | 33 | 20 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 29 | 11 | 12/3/2014 | ROCHESTER COLL | 84-52 | W | | - | | - | 31-54 | 57.4% | 40 | 11 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 20 | 10 | 12/6/2014 | @ MOREHEAD ST | 70-68 | W | 6.5 | W | | - | 26-52 | 50.0% | 31 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 16 | 12/14/2014 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 61-87 | L | 18.5 | L | 143.5 | O | 21-53 | 39.6% | 32 | 15 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 37 | 8 | 12/16/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 64-101 | L | 26 | L | 141 | O | 21-59 | 35.6% | 22 | 14 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 50 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2014 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/27/2014 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2015 | VALPARAISO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2015 | @ CLEVELAND ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | NIAGARA | 78-45 | W | -24.5 | W | | - | 30-57 | 52.6% | 38 | 9 | 12-48 | 25.0% | 27 | 11 | 11/16/2014 | SAMFORD | 63-56 | W | -31 | L | | - | 24-47 | 51.1% | 31 | 11 | 19-59 | 32.2% | 33 | 7 | 11/21/2014 | @ HAWAII | 70-74 | L | -12 | L | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 32 | 8 | 27-51 | 52.9% | 25 | 7 | 11/24/2014 | @ CHAMINADE | 81-68 | W | | - | | - | 29-63 | 46.0% | 51 | 15 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 17 | 13 | 11/25/2014 | *SAN DIEGO ST | 57-74 | L | 3 | L | 119 | O | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 17 | 27-46 | 58.7% | 21 | 9 | 11/26/2014 | *KANSAS ST | 70-47 | W | 4.5 | W | 129 | U | 26-47 | 55.3% | 22 | 10 | 15-46 | 32.6% | 32 | 15 | 12/2/2014 | @ INDIANA | 69-81 | L | 2.5 | L | 134 | O | 26-72 | 36.1% | 44 | 11 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 36 | 9 | 12/5/2014 | *DUQUESNE | 76-62 | W | -8.5 | W | | - | 25-57 | 43.9% | 45 | 10 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 14 | 12/13/2014 | ST BONAVENTURE | 58-54 | W | -8 | L | 129.5 | U | 20-50 | 40.0% | 33 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 37 | 15 | 12/17/2014 | MANHATTAN | 65-56 | W | -11 | L | | - | 23-45 | 51.1% | 28 | 16 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 28 | 20 | 12/20/2014 | OAKLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/23/2014 | HOLY CROSS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | FLA GULF COAST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| PITTSBURGH: Pittsburgh saw some success in its first season in the ACC, making the NCAA Tournament before losing to Florida in the Round of 32. SF Durand Johnson (8.8 PPG, 3.0 RPG in 19.8 MPG) is coming back from a torn ACL early last season, and if he is healthy, gives the Panthers a terrific long-range shooter (36% threes in career). The tandem of SG Cameron Wright (10.5 PPG, 3.3 RPG, 2.6 APG) and PG James Robinson (7.6 PPG, 4.1 APG, 3.1 RPG, 1.5 SPG) has a chance to be an excellent backcourt. The Panthers lost 30 points and nearly 14 rebounds from forwards Lamar Patterson and Talib Zanna last season, and the backcourt has the ability to make up a lot of those points. A return trip to the NCAA's could hinge on the play of two sophomores, C Michael Young (6.0 PPG, 4.1 RPG, 36% threes) and PF Jamel Artis (4.9 PPG, 2.9 RPG in 15.4 MPG). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/19/2024 11:40:55 AM EST. |
|
|