|
|
IOWA PENN ST |
|
| 132 | 74 Final 72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
527 | IOWA | -330 | 528 | PENN ST | +250 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 15-9 | -1 | 13-7 | 7-11 | 72.2 | 32.8 | 42.4% | 39.9 | 63.9 | 27.6 | 38.8% | 35.5 | Road Games | 3-7 | -3 | 6-4 | 5-5 | 67.6 | 29.8 | 39.1% | 37.1 | 71.6 | 30.7 | 42.9% | 37.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 67.6 | 27.2 | 37.2% | 40.0 | 65.0 | 26.0 | 38.1% | 38.4 | Conference Games | 4-7 | -2 | 7-4 | 4-6 | 66.5 | 27.7 | 39.2% | 37.8 | 67.2 | 27.3 | 41.3% | 37.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.2 | 32.8 | 25-58 | 42.4% | 5-18 | 29.6% | 17-24 | 71.1% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.5 | 29.4 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 12-18 | 68.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.6 | 29.8 | 23-59 | 39.1% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 16-23 | 68.4% | 37 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.9 | 27.6 | 23-59 | 38.8% | 6-20 | 28.5% | 12-17 | 71.7% | 36 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.3 | 31.1 | 24-56 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.6 | 30.7 | 25-59 | 42.9% | 5-18 | 28.4% | 16-22 | 72.4% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-15 | -9.2 | 7-11 | 7-8 | 60.3 | 26.7 | 38.2% | 35.7 | 67.0 | 29.0 | 42.1% | 33.7 | Home Games | 7-7 | -4.2 | 4-6 | 4-4 | 64.2 | 28.1 | 39.7% | 36.6 | 65.4 | 27.6 | 41.1% | 32.1 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 53.8 | 22.8 | 33.8% | 33.0 | 67.6 | 30.6 | 40.5% | 39.4 | Conference Games | 0-11 | -9 | 4-7 | 4-6 | 54.8 | 22.9 | 35.3% | 34.0 | 68.3 | 31.9 | 43.4% | 36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 60.3 | 26.7 | 21-54 | 38.2% | 5-18 | 26.7% | 14-21 | 69.7% | 36 | 9 | 9 | 22 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.3 | 29.5 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 13-18 | 69.5% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 64.2 | 28.1 | 21-54 | 39.7% | 5-19 | 28.1% | 16-23 | 69.4% | 37 | 9 | 10 | 22 | 5 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.0 | 29.0 | 21-50 | 42.1% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 19-26 | 71.0% | 34 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.3 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 65.4 | 27.6 | 21-50 | 41.1% | 6-20 | 33.1% | 18-24 | 73.5% | 32 | 5 | 11 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: IOWA 74.5, PENN ST 75.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2012 | INDIANA | 65-69 | L | 7 | W | 152.5 | U | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 46 | 15 | 1/6/2013 | @ MICHIGAN | 67-95 | L | 13.5 | L | 144.5 | O | 27-62 | 43.5% | 26 | 7 | 36-62 | 58.1% | 41 | 6 | 1/10/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | 59-62 | L | 2 | L | 136 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 35 | 18 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 36 | 12 | 1/13/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 70-50 | W | -1 | W | 133.5 | U | 29-63 | 46.0% | 43 | 9 | 15-51 | 29.4% | 33 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | WISCONSIN | 70-66 | W | 1 | W | 127.5 | O | 22-51 | 43.1% | 33 | 7 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 34 | 12 | 1/22/2013 | @ OHIO ST | 63-72 | L | 10 | W | 137.5 | U | 22-62 | 35.5% | 40 | 14 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 34 | 17 | 1/27/2013 | @ PURDUE | 62-65 | L | 2 | L | 137 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 42 | 10 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 45 | 8 | 1/31/2013 | PENN ST | 76-67 | W | -13 | L | 130.5 | O | 20-50 | 40.0% | 38 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 32 | 18 | 2/3/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 59-62 | L | 10 | W | 139.5 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 35 | 10 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 35 | 12 | 2/6/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | 70-74 | L | 8.5 | W | 124.5 | O | 25-74 | 33.8% | 51 | 12 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 49 | 12 | 2/9/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | 71-57 | W | -8 | W | 128 | P | 24-50 | 48.0% | 34 | 12 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 31 | 12 | 2/14/2013 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/2012 | DUQUESNE | 84-74 | W | -5 | W | | - | 25-59 | 42.4% | 50 | 15 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 28 | 10 | 1/3/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | 51-60 | L | 18.5 | W | 124 | U | 24-52 | 46.2% | 38 | 15 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 32 | 4 | 1/7/2013 | INDIANA | 51-74 | L | 16.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 35 | 19 | 22-42 | 52.4% | 33 | 17 | 1/10/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | 54-70 | L | -2 | L | 121 | O | 18-57 | 31.6% | 37 | 11 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 33 | 7 | 1/13/2013 | @ PURDUE | 42-60 | L | 11 | L | 127 | U | 15-58 | 25.9% | 33 | 14 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 42 | 14 | 1/16/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | 72-81 | L | 10.5 | W | 125 | O | 24-50 | 48.0% | 30 | 8 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 33 | 7 | 1/19/2013 | NEBRASKA | 64-68 | L | -4 | L | 120.5 | O | 22-57 | 38.6% | 36 | 14 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 27 | 11 | 1/23/2013 | @ INDIANA | 49-72 | L | 24.5 | W | 138.5 | U | 17-51 | 33.3% | 32 | 18 | 20-44 | 45.5% | 39 | 18 | 1/26/2013 | OHIO ST | 51-65 | L | 12.5 | L | 127.5 | U | 17-47 | 36.2% | 25 | 4 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 38 | 8 | 1/31/2013 | @ IOWA | 67-76 | L | 13 | W | 130.5 | O | 23-58 | 39.7% | 32 | 18 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 38 | 14 | 2/5/2013 | PURDUE | 49-58 | L | 2.5 | L | 125 | U | 19-62 | 30.6% | 37 | 8 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 42 | 10 | 2/9/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | 53-67 | L | 5.5 | L | 120 | P | 14-48 | 29.2% | 39 | 14 | 15-46 | 32.6% | 40 | 8 | 2/14/2013 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2013 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| IOWA: Fran McCaffery's Hawkeyes are another team that took a step forward last season, winning seven more games than the previous year and churning out eight Big Ten victories. Departed Matt Gatens carried that squad with 15.2 PPG, but the rest of the core is back with Roy Devyn Marble (11.5 PPG, 3.8 RPG, 3.6 APG) able to do it all, and sophomore forward Aaron White (11.7 PPG, 5.7 RPG) poised for more touches. 7-foot-1 freshman center Adam Woodbury will be a critical component joining White in the frontcourt, and fellow first-year point guard Mike Gesell should be key for helping Marble get more open looks. | | PENN ST: The Nittany Lions may be looking forward to the hardwood to distract from the football turmoil of the last year, but Patrick Chambers' crew will have a difficult time improving on last year's rough 4-14 record in the conference. The good news is they still have star point guard Tim Frazier (18.8 PPG, 4.7 RPG, 6.2 APG, 2.4 SPG) who is a workhorse on the perimeter, leading Penn State in points, rebounds, assists and steals last season. Jermaine Marshall (10.8 PPG) and Southern Miss transfer D.J. Newbill complete a strong backcourt, but PSU will be overmatched down low on a nightly basis. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/28/2024 9:17:33 AM EST. |
|
|