| | | |
WASHINGTON First Half Results OKLAHOMA |
|
| 68.5 | 40 Final 27 |
|
|
| | |
|
at MGM Grand - Las Vegas, NV | | | | |
581 | WASHINGTON | 65.5 | 582 | OKLAHOMA | -3 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 9-0 | +6.6 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 73.1 | 33.7 | 44.7% | 41.9 | 57.6 | 25.7 | 32.8% | 36.4 | Road Games | 5-0 | +4.6 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 73.0 | 33.4 | 43.6% | 39.4 | 61.6 | 27.6 | 36.1% | 37.0 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4.6 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 72.8 | 33.6 | 45.4% | 39.6 | 57.2 | 27.0 | 32.9% | 35.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.1 | 33.7 | 26-58 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 32.2% | 14-22 | 64.5% | 42 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 8 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.1 | 30.9 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 13-20 | 68.1% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.0 | 33.4 | 25-58 | 43.6% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 14-22 | 65.7% | 39 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 57.6 | 25.7 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 5-19 | 26.2% | 12-19 | 66.5% | 36 | 12 | 8 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 63.9 | 29.8 | 22-54 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 13-20 | 63.9% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 61.6 | 27.6 | 21-59 | 36.1% | 5-18 | 26.1% | 14-20 | 68.6% | 37 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-2 | +0.2 | 5-2 | 2-5 | 75.0 | 38.6 | 44.1% | 41.2 | 61.1 | 26.6 | 36.4% | 38.3 | Road Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 68.0 | 35.8 | 39.3% | 40.6 | 62.6 | 28.2 | 36.6% | 38.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 73.8 | 37.6 | 48.7% | 37.2 | 59.8 | 27.8 | 36.8% | 34.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.0 | 38.6 | 27-61 | 44.1% | 8-23 | 33.5% | 14-18 | 75.0% | 41 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.1 | 31.1 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 7-19 | 34.3% | 13-19 | 68.5% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.0 | 35.8 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 7-25 | 26.6% | 17-22 | 79.8% | 41 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.1 | 26.6 | 23-62 | 36.4% | 6-22 | 28.8% | 9-15 | 61.2% | 38 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71 | 33.4 | 24-56 | 43.7% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 16-23 | 69.2% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 62.6 | 28.2 | 22-61 | 36.6% | 6-22 | 27.7% | 12-18 | 63.7% | 38 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 67.1, OKLAHOMA 76.7 |
| | |
|
|
11/14/2014 | S CAROLINA ST | 77-59 | W | -23.5 | L | 148 | U | 32-68 | 47.1% | 51 | 12 | 24-73 | 32.9% | 37 | 8 | 11/21/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 63-48 | W | | - | | - | 22-59 | 37.3% | 40 | 11 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 45 | 13 | 11/23/2014 | *PACIFIC | 76-69 | W | -13 | L | 134 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 40 | 10 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 32 | 9 | 11/27/2014 | *SAN JOSE ST | 78-56 | W | -11.5 | W | 133 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 48 | 14 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 39 | 12 | 11/28/2014 | *LONG BEACH ST | 80-70 | W | 0 | W | 140 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 35 | 8 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 35 | 13 | 11/30/2014 | *UTEP | 68-65 | W | 4 | W | 133.5 | U | 24-56 | 42.9% | 34 | 11 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 34 | 16 | 12/7/2014 | SAN DIEGO ST | 49-36 | W | 1.5 | W | 126 | U | 18-48 | 37.5% | 36 | 11 | 11-54 | 20.4% | 42 | 12 | 12/14/2014 | E WASHINGTON | 81-77 | W | -7.5 | L | 146 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 42 | 13 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 35 | 12 | 12/17/2014 | GRAMBLING | 86-38 | W | -36.5 | W | 126 | U | 32-63 | 50.8% | 51 | 10 | 14-60 | 23.3% | 29 | 17 | 12/20/2014 | *OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2014 | TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/28/2014 | STONY BROOK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2015 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/16/2014 | SE LOUISIANA | 78-53 | W | | - | | - | 29-75 | 38.7% | 49 | 10 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 47 | 20 | 11/19/2014 | @ CREIGHTON | 63-65 | L | -4 | L | 156 | U | 22-62 | 35.5% | 44 | 12 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 37 | 9 | 11/23/2014 | NORTHWESTERN ST | 90-68 | W | | - | | - | 34-68 | 50.0% | 49 | 20 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 39 | 17 | 11/26/2014 | *UCLA | 75-65 | W | -2 | W | 152 | U | 21-64 | 32.8% | 43 | 10 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 51 | 13 | 11/27/2014 | *BUTLER | 59-46 | W | -3 | W | 141 | U | 20-44 | 45.5% | 41 | 16 | 14-59 | 23.7% | 32 | 10 | 11/28/2014 | *WISCONSIN | 56-69 | L | 7.5 | L | 132 | U | 17-46 | 37.0% | 35 | 21 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 32 | 11 | 12/5/2014 | MISSOURI | 82-63 | W | -14.5 | W | 131.5 | O | 31-54 | 57.4% | 35 | 14 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 28 | 16 | 12/13/2014 | @ TULSA | 87-68 | W | -4 | W | 137.5 | O | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 10 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 13 | 12/16/2014 | ORAL ROBERTS | 85-53 | W | -16.5 | W | 144 | U | 37-69 | 53.6% | 35 | 6 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 41 | 19 | 12/20/2014 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2014 | WEBER ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | GEORGE MASON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2015 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | WASHINGTON: The Huskies have had some struggles the past couple seasons, but have some potential to surprise people in the Pac-12. PG Nigel Williams-Goss (13.4 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 4.4 APG) is an ultra-talented floor leader that will have to become more of a scorer to help make up for the loss of C.J. Wilcox. At 6-foot-3, he has great size for the point, but will have to cut back on the turnovers. His partner in the backcourt is SG Andrew Andrews (12.3 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 2.6 APG), who is another combo guard who can go for 20 points on any given night. Both of these guys are very fast with the ball, and they put a lot of pressure on opposing defenses. The Huskies ranked 189th in the nation in rebounding, but teams can't crash the offensive glass because they have to get back to stop the fast break. For Washington to contend for an NCAA Tournament berth, PF Shawn Kemp Jr. (4.4 PPG, 1.8 RPG, 56% FG, 71% FT) must become more of a presence down low. If he is able to help the team rebound the ball, Washington could make a surprising run in the conference. | | OKLAHOMA: The Sooners have one of the budding stars in the conference in SG Buddy Hield (16.5 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 39% threes). The 6-foot-4 Hield is capable of scoring from anywhere on the court, and he becomes nearly impossible to guard when he is hitting perimeter shot. With Cameron Clark graduating, Hield will become the unquestioned No. 1 scoring option on the team. SG Isaiah Cousins (11.5 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 40% threes) will also be looked upon more as a scorer, and he proved last season he is ready for the opportunity. PF Ryan Spangler (9.6 PPG, 9.3 RPG, 58% FG) is the leading returning rebounder in the conference, which is huge for an undersized Sooners team. The team ranked seventh in the nation in scoring last season, but to take the next step in the Big 12, the Sooners are going to have to make some more stops on the defensive end, as they allowed 76.0 PPG (last in Big 12) last season. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 9/21/2024 12:26:02 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|