|
|
BOSTON COLLEGE NOTRE DAME |
|
| 138 | 73 Final 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
539 | BOSTON COLLEGE | +11 | Over 137 | 540 | NOTRE DAME | -3 | Under 145 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-14 | -16.1 | 5-13 | 7-8 | 69.9 | 32.3 | 44.4% | 30.7 | 73.7 | 34.6 | 45.9% | 32.9 | Road Games | 2-9 | -8 | 4-7 | 5-5 | 67.9 | 31.2 | 43.3% | 31.1 | 76.7 | 34.5 | 46.1% | 35.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 65.6 | 33.4 | 43.9% | 29.6 | 66.0 | 35.4 | 43.6% | 32.2 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -4.2 | 3-4 | 2-4 | 66.9 | 31.4 | 43.8% | 29.9 | 68.6 | 35.7 | 45.3% | 31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 32.3 | 22-50 | 44.4% | 8-23 | 34.4% | 17-23 | 75.3% | 31 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.2 | 32.3 | 24-56 | 42.6% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 68.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.9 | 31.2 | 22-52 | 43.3% | 8-23 | 33.5% | 15-21 | 73.5% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 4 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.7 | 34.6 | 26-56 | 45.9% | 6-16 | 36.3% | 16-22 | 73.9% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.6 | 33.6 | 25-57 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-22 | 69.4% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.7 | 34.5 | 27-58 | 46.1% | 6-16 | 36.9% | 17-23 | 73.8% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-10 | -13.5 | 6-12 | 7-8 | 75.2 | 36.0 | 46.1% | 35.4 | 70.8 | 33.8 | 44.8% | 32.2 | Home Games | 10-4 | -8.7 | 2-9 | 4-5 | 77.1 | 37.0 | 46.5% | 37.1 | 68.8 | 32.4 | 43.8% | 30.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 64.2 | 30.2 | 43.6% | 30.6 | 69.2 | 29.8 | 50.0% | 31.8 | Conference Games | 2-6 | -5.6 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 67.4 | 32.1 | 43.8% | 33.6 | 71.7 | 33.0 | 46.7% | 33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.2 | 36.0 | 27-59 | 46.1% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 14-19 | 72.9% | 35 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.1 | 32 | 24-57 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 15-21 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.1 | 37.0 | 27-59 | 46.5% | 8-20 | 38.5% | 15-20 | 74.8% | 37 | 10 | 17 | 15 | 7 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.8 | 33.8 | 25-57 | 44.8% | 7-19 | 37.1% | 13-17 | 75.2% | 32 | 8 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 73.1 | 34.4 | 26-56 | 45.3% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 16-22 | 70.0% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.8 | 32.4 | 25-57 | 43.8% | 8-19 | 38.8% | 12-16 | 74.4% | 31 | 7 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: BOSTON COLLEGE 74.1, NOTRE DAME 75.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2013 | PHIL TEXTILE | 67-50 | W | | - | | - | 27-54 | 50.0% | 43 | 14 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 24 | 5 | 12/22/2013 | @ AUBURN | 67-77 | L | -1 | L | 147 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 26 | 7 | 12/28/2013 | *VA COMMONWEALTH | 50-69 | L | 7 | L | 148.5 | U | 17-44 | 38.6% | 36 | 23 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 34 | 11 | 1/1/2014 | @ HARVARD | 58-73 | L | 9 | L | 143.5 | U | 20-50 | 40.0% | 24 | 10 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 36 | 10 | 1/4/2014 | CLEMSON | 60-62 | L | -1 | L | 126 | U | 15-41 | 36.6% | 33 | 13 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 31 | 9 | 1/11/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 62-59 | W | 0 | W | 142.5 | U | 22-51 | 43.1% | 38 | 10 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 38 | 6 | 1/13/2014 | SYRACUSE | 59-69 | L | 8.5 | L | 128 | P | 17-34 | 50.0% | 24 | 16 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 28 | 8 | 1/18/2014 | @ N CAROLINA | 71-82 | L | 12 | W | 144.5 | O | 21-48 | 43.7% | 32 | 18 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 29 | 12 | 1/21/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | 60-68 | L | -4.5 | L | 139.5 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 19 | 4 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 32 | 10 | 1/29/2014 | VIRGINIA TECH | 76-52 | W | -6 | W | 135 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 35 | 7 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 34 | 12 | 2/1/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/14/2013 | *INDIANA | 79-72 | W | 3 | W | 151 | P | 25-54 | 46.3% | 33 | 11 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 13 | 12/21/2013 | *OHIO ST | 61-64 | L | 6 | W | 137 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 33 | 13 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 11 | 12/29/2013 | CANISIUS | 87-81 | W | -12 | L | 142.5 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 44 | 16 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 31 | 14 | 1/4/2014 | DUKE | 79-77 | W | 5.5 | W | 148.5 | O | 30-57 | 52.6% | 39 | 6 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 30 | 6 | 1/7/2014 | NC STATE | 70-77 | L | -7.5 | L | 139.5 | O | 27-66 | 40.9% | 37 | 11 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 39 | 8 | 1/11/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 69-74 | L | -1 | L | 140 | O | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 8 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 41 | 11 | 1/15/2014 | @ MARYLAND | 66-74 | L | 5.5 | L | 144 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 17 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 11 | 1/19/2014 | VIRGINIA TECH | 70-63 | W | -9.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 24-58 | 41.4% | 30 | 10 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 35 | 17 | 1/21/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | 74-76 | L | 9.5 | W | 140 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 29 | 7 | 29-50 | 58.0% | 26 | 10 | 1/25/2014 | @ WAKE FOREST | 58-65 | L | 1.5 | L | 145.5 | U | 24-61 | 39.3% | 33 | 5 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 32 | 9 | 1/28/2014 | VIRGINIA | 53-68 | L | 4.5 | L | 127.5 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 30 | 20 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 26 | 12 | 2/1/2014 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2014 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2014 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| BOSTON COLLEGE: Despite finishing below .500 last season, Boston College made huge strides and should be able to at least reach the NIT, returning all five starters. Leading that crew is last year's ACC Freshman of the Year Olivier Hanlan (15.4 PPG, 4.2 RPG) while Ryan Anderson (14.9 PPG, 8.0 RPG) provides a steady post presence. This crew showed lots of potential last season, including a near upset of Duke, and won't be a fun team to play in conference season as an improving perimeter-oriented squad that likes to play four guards at times with Joe Rahon (10.1 PPG, 3.7 APG), Lonnie Jackson (8.7 PPG, 38% 3-pt FG) and Patrick Heckmann (8.0 PPG, 38% 3-pt FG) joining the two stars. Notre Dame transfer Alex Dragicevich (34% 3-pt FG in 2011-12) will be counted on for long-range shooting. | | NOTRE DAME: It will be a new-look Notre Dame squad in its first campaign in the ACC, one without Jack Cooley to put up double-doubles every night. The backcourt won't change with Jerian Grant (13.3 PPG, 5.5 APG), who is still an effective scorer who should be able to put up even more points as a senior while still distributing the ball well. Same goes for Eric Atkins (11.2 PPG, 5.5 APG), who also handles some of the ball-handling duties. What could make or break Mike Brey's team could be how quickly freshman Demetrius Jackson adjusts to college ball. The 6-foot-1 guard is among the most highly-touted incoming perimeter players in the nation and could make this team difficult to deal with in transition and from beyond the arc. The frontcourt is comprised of a pair of fifth-year seniors in Tom Knight (5.5 PPG, 3.5 RPG) and Garrick Sherman (7.0 PPG, 3.4 RPG) who are both 6-foot-10. Sophomore Zach Auguste (3.7 PPG in 10.7 MPG), also 6-foot-10, will also log key minutes once he returns from a broken hand in 4-to-6 weeks. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 9:56:06 AM EST. |
|
|