|
|
CONNECTICUT First Half Results NOTRE DAME |
|
|
| 29 Final 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ![](https://foxsheets.statfoxsports.com/images/logos/ncaa/CONNECTICUT.gif) | |
541 | CONNECTICUT | | 542 | NOTRE DAME | -5 |
|
|
| ![](https://foxsheets.statfoxsports.com/images/logos/ncaa/NOTRE%20DAME.gif) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-3 | +4.8 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 73.1 | 34.1 | 46.3% | 32.4 | 64.3 | 28.1 | 39.9% | 36.4 | Road Games | 3-3 | +1.8 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 72.2 | 31.2 | 43.1% | 30.0 | 72.2 | 30.5 | 42.4% | 38.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 81.6 | 41.6 | 51.2% | 34.8 | 67.2 | 29.0 | 40.3% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 87.5 | 40.5 | 47.3% | 40.0 | 80.0 | 32.0 | 43.7% | 35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.1 | 34.1 | 26-56 | 46.3% | 6-17 | 32.6% | 16-21 | 73.9% | 32 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 31 | 24-56 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.2 | 31.2 | 24-57 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 17-22 | 78.2% | 30 | 7 | 11 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.3 | 28.1 | 23-57 | 39.9% | 5-17 | 30.6% | 13-19 | 70.2% | 36 | 12 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.3 | 32 | 24-55 | 43.7% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 15-22 | 69.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.2 | 30.5 | 24-57 | 42.4% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 18-25 | 71.9% | 38 | 12 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-1 | +5 | 7-4 | 5-2 | 76.8 | 37.1 | 51.4% | 37.6 | 60.9 | 28.4 | 38.8% | 30.5 | Home Games | 11-0 | +3 | 4-3 | 3-1 | 77.9 | 38.1 | 53.0% | 39.2 | 58.0 | 27.1 | 37.3% | 29.1 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +2.7 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 81.4 | 38.4 | 56.3% | 34.8 | 64.0 | 30.8 | 40.5% | 27.6 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +2.7 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 79.5 | 38.0 | 53.6% | 30.0 | 67.0 | 32.0 | 46.0% | 29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.8 | 37.1 | 29-56 | 51.4% | 8-18 | 41.5% | 12-18 | 69.1% | 38 | 9 | 19 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.4 | 31.1 | 24-55 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 13-20 | 68.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.9 | 38.1 | 30-56 | 53.0% | 8-18 | 41.5% | 11-17 | 67.0% | 39 | 9 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.9 | 28.4 | 23-59 | 38.8% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 9-13 | 69.7% | 31 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 68.2 | 32.1 | 24-57 | 42.5% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 67.5% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.0 | 27.1 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 7-11 | 68.1% | 29 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 73.8, NOTRE DAME 70.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2012 | STONY BROOK | 73-62 | W | | - | | - | 24-53 | 45.3% | 35 | 12 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 38 | 13 | 11/29/2012 | NEW HAMPSHIRE | 61-53 | W | | - | | - | 21-57 | 36.8% | 43 | 13 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 40 | 15 | 12/4/2012 | *NC STATE | 65-69 | L | 4 | T | 141.5 | U | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 12 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 37 | 12 | 12/7/2012 | HARVARD | 57-49 | W | -9 | L | | - | 24-46 | 52.2% | 20 | 11 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 27 | 18 | 12/17/2012 | MD-EAST SHORE | 84-50 | W | | - | | - | 33-50 | 66.0% | 26 | 9 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 30 | 16 | 12/21/2012 | FORDHAM | 88-73 | W | -16 | L | | - | 31-61 | 50.8% | 28 | 11 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 40 | 21 | 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | 61-53 | W | -6.5 | W | 137 | U | 22-47 | 46.8% | 40 | 17 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 36 | 13 | 1/1/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | 76-82 | L | 5 | L | 133 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 31 | 9 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 41 | 9 | 1/8/2013 | DEPAUL | 99-78 | W | -9 | W | | - | 36-73 | 49.3% | 49 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 1/12/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/24/2012 | ST FRANCIS-PA | 69-52 | W | | - | | - | 28-57 | 49.1% | 42 | 9 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 25 | 9 | 11/26/2012 | CHICAGO ST | 92-65 | W | -32 | L | 133.5 | O | 36-59 | 61.0% | 36 | 10 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 30 | 9 | 11/29/2012 | KENTUCKY | 64-50 | W | -1.5 | W | 135 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 33 | 11 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 27 | 12 | 12/8/2012 | BROWN | 84-57 | W | -21.5 | W | | - | 34-68 | 50.0% | 42 | 3 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 32 | 12 | 12/15/2012 | *PURDUE | 81-68 | W | -7.5 | W | 124.5 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 38 | 12 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 15 | 12/17/2012 | IUPU-FT WAYNE | 74-62 | W | -21.5 | L | 132 | O | 29-56 | 51.8% | 37 | 13 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 34 | 11 | 12/19/2012 | KENNESAW ST | 85-57 | W | | - | | - | 32-52 | 61.5% | 36 | 11 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 17 | 10 | 12/21/2012 | NIAGARA | 89-67 | W | -15.5 | W | 141.5 | O | 31-50 | 62.0% | 41 | 11 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 29 | 5 | 1/5/2013 | SETON HALL | 93-74 | W | -9.5 | W | | - | 35-62 | 56.5% | 37 | 8 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 30 | 11 | 1/7/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | 66-60 | W | 4.5 | W | 132.5 | U | 24-48 | 50.0% | 23 | 7 | 23-49 | 46.9% | 28 | 9 | 1/12/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
![](http://statfox.com/images/yellowarrow.jpg) | CONNECTICUT: Hall of Famer Jim Calhoun is no longer roaming the sidelines for the Huskies, and his former point guard Kevin Ollie will take the reins with zero head coaching experience. It will take Ollie a while to rebuild this team that lost Jeremy Lamb and Andre Drummond to the NBA and Alex Oriakhi to transfer. Shabazz Napier (13.0 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 5.8 APG) will have to bear the brunt of the burden running this offense while Ryan Boatright (10.4 PPG, 4.0 APG, 38% 3-pt FG) will have to step up in his sophomore year. Omar Calhoun should be a valuable asset at guard in his freshman season, but it will still be difficult for this crew to compete in the conference. | ![](http://statfox.com/images/yellowarrow.jpg) | NOTRE DAME: Any Mike Brey squad can compete, and this year's team has the potential to do way more than that with all five starters returning from a squad that finished third in the conference with a 13-5 record. Jack Cooley (12.5 PPG, 8.9 RPG) is one of the Big East's premier bigs, coming off an uber-efficient campaign in which he made 62.5% of his field goals and swatted 1.6 shots per game. But the backcourt figures to be just as dangerous led by Jerian Grant (12.3 PPG, 5.0 APG) and Eric Atkins (12.1 PPG, 4.1 APG). Both are strong passers and shooters, who should have no problem making this offense flow alongside 6-foot-8 swingman Scott Martin (9.5 PPG, 5.7 RPG). He is a matchup nightmare with a guard's skillset and a forward's body. Throw in some fresh blood with small forward Cameron Biedscheid and power forwards Austin Burgett and Eric Katenda, and this team has no shortage of talent in the frontcourt. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/6/2024 12:31:47 AM EST. |
|
|