|
|
N KENTUCKY First Half Results NORTHWESTERN |
|
| 58.5 | 24 Final 36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
567 | N KENTUCKY | 58.5 | 568 | NORTHWESTERN | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-6 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 70.6 | 34.4 | 45.3% | 33.9 | 67.7 | 30.6 | 42.1% | 34.4 | Road Games | 2-4 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 65.8 | 32.5 | 43.1% | 28.8 | 75.0 | 36.5 | 48.6% | 33.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 78.8 | 39.4 | 46.5% | 37.4 | 68.2 | 32.8 | 38.6% | 34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 34.4 | 25-56 | 45.3% | 8-22 | 34.7% | 12-18 | 68.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 72.2 | 34.4 | 25-56 | 45.5% | 8-21 | 35.9% | 14-21 | 67.4% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.8 | 32.5 | 23-54 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 13-19 | 71.1% | 29 | 7 | 9 | 24 | 5 | 11 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.7 | 30.6 | 22-53 | 42.1% | 6-22 | 29.5% | 17-24 | 69.1% | 34 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 31.9 | 24-56 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 32.9% | 14-21 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.0 | 36.5 | 24-49 | 48.6% | 8-21 | 37.0% | 19-28 | 70.5% | 34 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 4 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-4 | -0.7 | 6-4 | 4-2 | 65.0 | 29.2 | 43.1% | 35.6 | 60.2 | 28.5 | 40.4% | 33.2 | Home Games | 6-2 | -0.8 | 3-3 | 3-0 | 69.7 | 29.5 | 45.1% | 36.5 | 61.7 | 28.2 | 40.1% | 34.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.5 | 4-1 | 3-0 | 70.8 | 32.0 | 47.3% | 36.0 | 60.2 | 28.0 | 38.8% | 33.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 65.0 | 29.2 | 23-54 | 43.1% | 7-19 | 33.9% | 12-17 | 69.1% | 36 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 4 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.7 | 31.7 | 24-54 | 43.4% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 14-21 | 67.9% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.7 | 29.5 | 25-55 | 45.1% | 6-20 | 32.3% | 13-20 | 67.7% | 36 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 4 | 10 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.2 | 28.5 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 5-15 | 36.3% | 12-20 | 63.0% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 69.7 | 32.6 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 15-21 | 69.5% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.7 | 28.2 | 22-55 | 40.1% | 6-17 | 36.8% | 12-18 | 64.6% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: N KENTUCKY 66.8, NORTHWESTERN 68.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | @ WISCONSIN | 31-62 | L | 28.5 | L | 138 | U | 14-53 | 26.4% | 28 | 10 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 42 | 9 | 11/16/2014 | @ NEBRASKA | 61-80 | L | | - | | - | 21-58 | 36.2% | 36 | 13 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 33 | 10 | 11/19/2014 | N CAROLINA A&T | 68-55 | W | | - | | - | 25-51 | 49.0% | 31 | 9 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 27 | 10 | 11/22/2014 | OHIO MIDWEST | 98-48 | W | | - | | - | 39-63 | 61.9% | 47 | 12 | 14-54 | 25.9% | 29 | 13 | 11/26/2014 | @ E WASHINGTON | 60-81 | L | | - | | - | 22-59 | 37.3% | 28 | 12 | 29-52 | 55.8% | 38 | 14 | 11/29/2014 | @ IDAHO | 79-74 | W | | - | | - | 28-49 | 57.1% | 28 | 13 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 35 | 14 | 12/3/2014 | TENN-MARTIN | 56-71 | L | | - | | - | 21-50 | 42.0% | 22 | 14 | 27-51 | 52.9% | 37 | 14 | 12/7/2014 | W VIRGINIA | 42-67 | L | | - | | - | 13-49 | 26.5% | 38 | 20 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 46 | 12 | 12/14/2014 | UC-CLERMONT | 107-53 | W | | - | | - | 38-69 | 55.1% | 58 | 11 | 17-61 | 27.9% | 29 | 9 | 12/16/2014 | @ UT-CHATTANOOGA | 81-93 | L | | - | | - | 26-53 | 49.1% | 22 | 7 | 27-43 | 62.8% | 25 | 8 | 12/19/2014 | @ MOREHEAD ST | 83-60 | W | | - | | - | 29-53 | 54.7% | 31 | 10 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 29 | 14 | 12/22/2014 | IDAHO | 81-68 | W | | - | | - | 28-64 | 43.7% | 38 | 9 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 43 | 11 | 12/27/2014 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | @ YOUNGSTOWN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ LIPSCOMB | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2015 | KENNESAW ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2015 | @ USC UPSTATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | HOUSTN BAPTIST | 65-58 | W | | - | | - | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 5 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 40 | 10 | 11/17/2014 | @ BROWN | 69-56 | W | 2 | W | | - | 22-50 | 44.0% | 39 | 15 | 16-44 | 36.4% | 25 | 15 | 11/20/2014 | N FLORIDA | 69-67 | W | | - | | - | 25-56 | 44.6% | 33 | 14 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 29 | 12 | 11/22/2014 | ELON | 68-67 | W | -12.5 | L | | - | 19-47 | 40.4% | 39 | 16 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 38 | 15 | 11/25/2014 | *MIAMI OHIO | 55-46 | W | -7.5 | W | 118.5 | U | 19-48 | 39.6% | 37 | 16 | 15-48 | 31.2% | 29 | 12 | 11/26/2014 | *N IOWA | 42-61 | L | 6 | L | 117.5 | U | 16-53 | 30.2% | 28 | 10 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 36 | 12 | 12/3/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | 58-66 | L | -2 | L | 118 | O | 23-55 | 41.8% | 35 | 12 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 35 | 11 | 12/6/2014 | @ BUTLER | 56-65 | L | 11.5 | W | 118 | O | 22-54 | 40.7% | 31 | 12 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 33 | 9 | 12/14/2014 | MISS VALLEY ST | 101-49 | W | -21 | W | 134 | O | 39-68 | 57.4% | 51 | 11 | 18-62 | 29.0% | 33 | 15 | 12/17/2014 | C MICHIGAN | 67-80 | L | -6 | L | | - | 26-62 | 41.9% | 26 | 8 | 28-48 | 58.3% | 31 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | W MICHIGAN | 67-61 | W | -4 | W | 127.5 | O | 23-54 | 42.6% | 39 | 7 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 33 | 8 | 12/22/2014 | IL-CHICAGO | 63-46 | W | -10 | W | | - | 22-41 | 53.7% | 33 | 11 | 15-60 | 25.0% | 36 | 10 | 12/27/2014 | N KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2015 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2015 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NORTHWESTERN: The Wildcats are once again in search of making the NCAA Tournament for the first time in school history, but face an uphill battle. SG JerShon Cobb (12.2 PPG, 4.8 RPG, 2.3 APG) is back, and will have to take his game to another level to help fill the void left by Drew Crawford. At 6-foot-5, Cobb has great size and athleticism for a guard, and is most effective when he is driving to the rim. PG Tre Demps (11.0 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 2.2 APG) is a high-IQ player who has the ability to take some pressure off Cobb. The backcourt of the Wildcats is definitely the strength of this team, but for them to make a push towards a postseason berth, they need C Alex Olah (9.1 PPG, 5.2 RPG, 1.8 BPG) to become a more physical presence, and to dominate the glass. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/19/2024 10:57:29 AM EST. |
|
|