| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
NEBRASKA MINNESOTA |
|
| 128.5 | 42 Final 60 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
627 | NEBRASKA | +11 | Over 125 | 628 | MINNESOTA | -3 | Under 133 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 12-8 | -1.6 | 6-10 | 4-9 | 64.2 | 30.5 | 42.8% | 33.4 | 61.2 | 27.8 | 38.5% | 35.7 | Road Games | 3-5 | -1.9 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 58.6 | 26.1 | 40.3% | 30.6 | 61.9 | 26.9 | 38.8% | 36.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 3-1 | 2-3 | 56.6 | 27.2 | 40.9% | 30.2 | 59.4 | 26.4 | 38.5% | 35.0 | Conference Games | 4-4 | +0.3 | 4-3 | 3-5 | 59.0 | 27.7 | 42.3% | 30.2 | 60.7 | 28.7 | 39.0% | 36.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.2 | 30.5 | 22-51 | 42.8% | 5-18 | 30.0% | 15-21 | 71.8% | 33 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.8 | 31 | 24-56 | 42.6% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 69.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 58.6 | 26.1 | 20-50 | 40.3% | 4-17 | 26.3% | 14-20 | 71.1% | 31 | 7 | 8 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.2 | 27.8 | 21-54 | 38.5% | 6-21 | 30.4% | 13-20 | 66.3% | 36 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 70.4 | 33.3 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 7-19 | 34.4% | 14-20 | 69.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 61.9 | 26.9 | 20-52 | 38.8% | 5-19 | 28.5% | 16-22 | 72.6% | 36 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-9 | -5.1 | 7-11 | 8-8 | 76.6 | 36.9 | 46.7% | 34.6 | 66.2 | 31.0 | 42.2% | 36.0 | Home Games | 11-2 | +0.3 | 6-4 | 6-1 | 85.8 | 40.7 | 51.5% | 34.9 | 65.8 | 31.5 | 42.1% | 35.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 70.0 | 30.0 | 43.2% | 32.0 | 68.6 | 32.4 | 44.6% | 35.0 | Conference Games | 2-7 | -6 | 1-8 | 3-6 | 67.2 | 30.6 | 41.8% | 33.1 | 69.0 | 32.1 | 44.6% | 35.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.6 | 36.9 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 8-20 | 38.9% | 13-20 | 64.9% | 35 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67 | 30.9 | 24-56 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 13-20 | 67.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.8 | 40.7 | 32-62 | 51.5% | 8-20 | 41.6% | 14-21 | 68.1% | 35 | 10 | 21 | 17 | 12 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.2 | 31.0 | 23-54 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 69.0% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 18 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 33 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 14-21 | 69.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 65.8 | 31.5 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 37.1% | 11-16 | 68.6% | 35 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 20 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: NEBRASKA 75.7, MINNESOTA 73.4 |
| | |
|
|
12/13/2014 | CINCINNATI | 56-55 | W | -5 | L | 122 | U | 16-49 | 32.7% | 42 | 22 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 43 | 18 | 12/22/2014 | @ HAWAII | 58-66 | L | -4 | L | 135 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 39 | 18 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 11 | 12/23/2014 | *LOYOLA-MARYMOUNT | 50-42 | W | -10 | L | 128 | U | 14-38 | 36.8% | 22 | 13 | 14-50 | 28.0% | 40 | 20 | 12/25/2014 | *OHIO U | 71-58 | W | -5 | W | 129 | P | 23-51 | 45.1% | 39 | 12 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 28 | 15 | 12/31/2014 | INDIANA | 65-70 | L | -4 | L | 137 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 31 | 8 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 44 | 11 | 1/5/2015 | @ IOWA | 59-70 | L | 9.5 | L | 126 | O | 22-48 | 45.8% | 29 | 10 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 32 | 9 | 1/8/2015 | RUTGERS | 65-49 | W | -10 | W | 117.5 | U | 27-55 | 49.1% | 31 | 9 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 39 | 19 | 1/11/2015 | ILLINOIS | 53-43 | W | -3 | W | 123.5 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 13 | 15-55 | 27.3% | 30 | 9 | 1/15/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | 55-70 | L | 15 | T | 120 | O | 21-50 | 42.0% | 24 | 5 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 27 | 6 | 1/20/2015 | MINNESOTA | 52-49 | W | -2 | W | 129.5 | U | 17-42 | 40.5% | 37 | 15 | 16-52 | 30.8% | 36 | 16 | 1/24/2015 | MICHIGAN ST | 79-77 | W | 2 | W | 119.5 | O | 22-45 | 48.9% | 26 | 10 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 48 | 16 | 1/27/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 44-58 | L | 2 | L | 115 | U | 15-49 | 30.6% | 26 | 10 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 34 | 13 | 1/31/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2015 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2015 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/19/2014 | SEATTLE | 92-57 | W | -21.5 | W | 137 | O | 33-60 | 55.0% | 36 | 11 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 30 | 21 | 12/22/2014 | FURMAN | 86-76 | W | -28 | L | | - | 32-61 | 52.5% | 38 | 14 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 31 | 19 | 12/27/2014 | UNC-WILMINGTON | 108-82 | W | -19.5 | W | 147.5 | O | 40-67 | 59.7% | 27 | 8 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 39 | 20 | 12/31/2014 | @ PURDUE | 68-72 | L | -1 | L | 147.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 31 | 13 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 12 | 1/3/2015 | @ MARYLAND | 58-70 | L | 4 | L | 141.5 | U | 22-65 | 33.8% | 35 | 12 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 44 | 19 | 1/6/2015 | OHIO ST | 72-74 | L | -1 | L | 146.5 | U | 27-60 | 45.0% | 35 | 14 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 34 | 14 | 1/10/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 57-62 | L | 2 | L | 133 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 37 | 17 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 31 | 9 | 1/13/2015 | IOWA | 75-77 | L | -3 | L | 139 | O | 27-59 | 45.8% | 30 | 9 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 1/17/2015 | RUTGERS | 89-80 | W | -12.5 | L | 131.5 | O | 34-66 | 51.5% | 28 | 8 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 39 | 19 | 1/20/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 49-52 | L | 2 | L | 129.5 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 36 | 16 | 17-42 | 40.5% | 37 | 15 | 1/24/2015 | ILLINOIS | 79-71 | W | -6.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 24-51 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 30 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | @ PENN ST | 58-63 | L | -1.5 | L | 136 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 28 | 15 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 36 | 16 | 1/31/2015 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | NEBRASKA: The Cornhuskers had a tremendous 2013-2014 season, and bring back players capable of making a similar run. SF Terran Petteway (18.1 PPG, 4.8 RPG, 1.6 APG) is one of the top contenders for the Big Ten Player of the Year. He is at his best attacking the rim, and can also be a menace on the defensive end. If he can improve on his shooting from outside (33% threes), he could see his scoring increase even more. Combining Petteway with SF Shavon Shields (12.8 PPG, 5.8 RPG), gives the Cornhuskers one of the best duos in the conference. Shields is a very similar player to Petteway, as he is also very dangerous in the open court. If Nebraska improves from the outside, this team could move up even higher in the conference standings. | | MINNESOTA: If you're looking for a sleeper team in the Big Ten, it is the Golden Gophers. Minnesota is coming off an NIT championship win against SMU, and brings back all but one starter. SG Andre Hollins (13.6 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 2.4 APG) had a solid junior campaign, but saw his numbers drop in every statistic. Especially worrisome was his shooting percentages, as he shot only 38% FG and 34% from threes, falling considerably from 42% in both areas as a sophomore. He is relentless when attacking, but he can get out of control, and try to shoot himself out of a slump. PG Deandre Mathieu (12 PPG, 4.2 APG and 2.7 RPG) is a cool customer at the point guard running the offense, as he doesn't get too high or low on the court. He has the speed to get by the defender, but the IQ to know whether to dish it off or attack the rim. Veteran PFs Maurice Walker (7.8 PPG, 4.5 RPG, 56% FG) and Joey King (7.1 PPG, 2.7 RPG, 48% FG) and 6-foot-11 C Elliott Eliason (5.0 PPG, 6.6 RPG) give the Golden Gophers size, experience and toughness in the post. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/11/2024 10:52:39 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|