| | | |
ILLINOIS MINNESOTA |
|
| 138.5 | 71 Final 79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
559 | ILLINOIS | 139 | 139 | 560 | MINNESOTA | -5 | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 13-7 | -3.7 | 8-10 | 5-10 | 73.6 | 34.7 | 43.1% | 35.6 | 63.7 | 28.8 | 40.7% | 34.6 | Road Games | 4-6 | -3.5 | 3-7 | 4-6 | 64.3 | 31.2 | 38.8% | 34.3 | 66.5 | 30.3 | 43.9% | 37.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 63.8 | 30.2 | 37.6% | 32.8 | 62.8 | 31.4 | 42.8% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -2.2 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 63.6 | 31.4 | 39.0% | 31.6 | 66.3 | 31.3 | 44.5% | 33.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.6 | 34.7 | 26-59 | 43.1% | 8-21 | 36.2% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.9 | 30.8 | 23-56 | 41.8% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.3 | 31.2 | 23-60 | 38.8% | 7-22 | 30.7% | 11-15 | 75.0% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.7 | 28.8 | 23-56 | 40.7% | 7-21 | 32.9% | 11-16 | 70.2% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.1 | 32.5 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 70.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.5 | 30.3 | 24-54 | 43.9% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 12-17 | 71.3% | 37 | 6 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-8 | -4.9 | 6-10 | 7-7 | 77.4 | 37.8 | 47.1% | 34.8 | 66.1 | 31.0 | 42.4% | 36.2 | Home Games | 10-2 | -0.7 | 5-4 | 5-1 | 86.4 | 41.3 | 51.8% | 34.7 | 65.4 | 31.7 | 42.5% | 35.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.7 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 68.4 | 30.0 | 43.0% | 33.2 | 69.0 | 33.0 | 47.3% | 34.8 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -5.8 | 0-7 | 2-5 | 66.9 | 31.3 | 41.6% | 33.1 | 69.6 | 32.3 | 46.2% | 35.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.4 | 37.8 | 28-60 | 47.1% | 8-20 | 39.2% | 13-20 | 63.9% | 35 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.9 | 31 | 24-56 | 42.0% | 7-19 | 33.6% | 13-20 | 67.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.4 | 41.3 | 32-62 | 51.8% | 8-20 | 41.3% | 14-20 | 67.2% | 35 | 9 | 21 | 17 | 13 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.1 | 31.0 | 23-54 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 14-21 | 68.0% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 19 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 33 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 14-21 | 68.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 65.4 | 31.7 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 10-16 | 67.0% | 35 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 21 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ILLINOIS 75.8, MINNESOTA 72.7 |
| | |
|
|
12/6/2014 | AMERICAN | 70-55 | W | | - | | - | 23-48 | 47.9% | 29 | 14 | 21-42 | 50.0% | 18 | 19 | 12/9/2014 | *VILLANOVA | 59-73 | L | 6 | L | 140.5 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 30 | 14 | 29-54 | 53.7% | 37 | 16 | 12/13/2014 | *OREGON | 70-77 | L | -6 | L | 145 | O | 23-64 | 35.9% | 40 | 9 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 40 | 12 | 12/17/2014 | HAMPTON | 73-55 | W | -22.5 | L | 140 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 16 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 35 | 12 | 12/20/2014 | *MISSOURI | 62-59 | W | -9.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 33 | 8 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 32 | 14 | 12/27/2014 | KENNESAW ST | 93-45 | W | -27 | W | 140 | U | 36-65 | 55.4% | 42 | 6 | 15-61 | 24.6% | 35 | 16 | 12/30/2014 | @ MICHIGAN | 65-73 | L | 3 | L | 133.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 36 | 12 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 39 | 5 | 1/3/2015 | @ OHIO ST | 61-77 | L | 7.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 20-45 | 44.4% | 21 | 20 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 26 | 18 | 1/7/2015 | MARYLAND | 64-57 | W | 1 | W | 130 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 36 | 7 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 33 | 10 | 1/11/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 43-53 | L | 3 | L | 123.5 | U | 15-55 | 27.3% | 30 | 9 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 13 | 1/14/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 72-67 | W | -2 | W | 123 | O | 26-62 | 41.9% | 30 | 3 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 35 | 11 | 1/18/2015 | INDIANA | 74-80 | L | -5.5 | L | 141 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 25 | 10 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 31 | 9 | 1/21/2015 | PURDUE | 66-57 | W | -2.5 | W | 134 | U | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 9 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 35 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/5/2014 | W CAROLINA | 84-64 | W | -17 | W | | - | 31-54 | 57.4% | 26 | 14 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 34 | 24 | 12/8/2014 | N DAKOTA | 92-56 | W | -21 | W | 140.5 | O | 36-60 | 60.0% | 29 | 12 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 33 | 25 | 12/10/2014 | SOUTHERN U | 85-57 | W | | - | | - | 29-53 | 54.7% | 37 | 16 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 33 | 20 | 12/19/2014 | SEATTLE | 92-57 | W | -21.5 | W | 137 | O | 33-60 | 55.0% | 36 | 11 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 30 | 21 | 12/22/2014 | FURMAN | 86-76 | W | -28 | L | | - | 32-61 | 52.5% | 38 | 14 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 31 | 19 | 12/27/2014 | UNC-WILMINGTON | 108-82 | W | -19.5 | W | 147.5 | O | 40-67 | 59.7% | 27 | 8 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 39 | 20 | 12/31/2014 | @ PURDUE | 68-72 | L | -1 | L | 147.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 31 | 13 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 12 | 1/3/2015 | @ MARYLAND | 58-70 | L | 4 | L | 141.5 | U | 22-65 | 33.8% | 35 | 12 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 44 | 19 | 1/6/2015 | OHIO ST | 72-74 | L | -1 | L | 146.5 | U | 27-60 | 45.0% | 35 | 14 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 34 | 14 | 1/10/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 57-62 | L | 2 | L | 133 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 37 | 17 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 31 | 9 | 1/13/2015 | IOWA | 75-77 | L | -3 | L | 139 | O | 27-59 | 45.8% | 30 | 9 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 1/17/2015 | RUTGERS | 89-80 | W | -12.5 | L | 131.5 | O | 34-66 | 51.5% | 28 | 8 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 39 | 19 | 1/20/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 49-52 | L | 2 | L | 129.5 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 36 | 16 | 17-42 | 40.5% | 37 | 15 | 1/24/2015 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2015 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | ILLINOIS: The Illini are an interesting team as they bring back all five starters from last season. SG Rayvonte Rice (15.9 PPG, 6.0 RPG, 1.7 SPG) is a major contributor on both ends of the court, and can score a lot of points without being the No. 1 option on the play. At 6-foot-4 and 230 pounds, he is very difficult for smaller guards to contain on the block and keep off the offensive glass. PG Tracy Abrams (10.7 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 3.2 APG) struggled from the field last season (33% FG), but he is a capable scorer who can erupt at any time. He will become much more difficult to guard if he is able to hit the outside shot more consistently. C Nnanna Egwu (6.9 PPG, 6.0 RPG and 2.1 BPG) is a great player on the defensive end, but also an emerging player on offense. The Illini have guys that can score, so they are looking for the 6-foot-11 senior to just crash the glass and help get second chance opportunities. | | MINNESOTA: If you're looking for a sleeper team in the Big Ten, it is the Golden Gophers. Minnesota is coming off an NIT championship win against SMU, and brings back all but one starter. SG Andre Hollins (13.6 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 2.4 APG) had a solid junior campaign, but saw his numbers drop in every statistic. Especially worrisome was his shooting percentages, as he shot only 38% FG and 34% from threes, falling considerably from 42% in both areas as a sophomore. He is relentless when attacking, but he can get out of control, and try to shoot himself out of a slump. PG Deandre Mathieu (12 PPG, 4.2 APG and 2.7 RPG) is a cool customer at the point guard running the offense, as he doesn't get too high or low on the court. He has the speed to get by the defender, but the IQ to know whether to dish it off or attack the rim. Veteran PFs Maurice Walker (7.8 PPG, 4.5 RPG, 56% FG) and Joey King (7.1 PPG, 2.7 RPG, 48% FG) and 6-foot-11 C Elliott Eliason (5.0 PPG, 6.6 RPG) give the Golden Gophers size, experience and toughness in the post. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 11:14:29 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|