| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
MICHIGAN MICHIGAN ST |
|
| 120.5 | 66 Final 76 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
809 | MICHIGAN | +13.5 | Over 119.5 | 810 | MICHIGAN ST | -5.5 | Under 127.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 13-8 | +2 | 8-10 | 6-12 | 64.5 | 31.0 | 41.5% | 31.9 | 61.1 | 27.5 | 43.2% | 33.5 | Road Games | 3-4 | -0.8 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 58.3 | 27.9 | 39.0% | 29.4 | 64.3 | 29.3 | 45.0% | 36.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 56.8 | 25.0 | 38.3% | 32.6 | 57.6 | 28.2 | 41.4% | 33.0 | Conference Games | 6-3 | +3.2 | 6-3 | 3-6 | 60.3 | 27.2 | 39.7% | 31.8 | 59.6 | 28.2 | 41.5% | 34.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.5 | 31.0 | 22-54 | 41.5% | 8-23 | 35.6% | 12-16 | 75.2% | 32 | 7 | 12 | 14 | 6 | 10 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.1 | 30.9 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 58.3 | 27.9 | 20-51 | 39.0% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 12-15 | 76.4% | 29 | 6 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.1 | 27.5 | 23-52 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 10-14 | 68.5% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.1 | 32.9 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 14-19 | 69.9% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.3 | 29.3 | 24-53 | 45.0% | 5-18 | 29.8% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 14-7 | -2.2 | 11-10 | 10-9 | 73.5 | 34.3 | 47.5% | 39.6 | 62.1 | 28.0 | 38.2% | 30.9 | Home Games | 9-2 | -0.2 | 7-4 | 4-5 | 76.0 | 35.6 | 48.0% | 40.8 | 58.6 | 22.8 | 35.9% | 30.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 71.4 | 32.6 | 45.7% | 39.2 | 68.4 | 36.2 | 41.9% | 29.0 | Conference Games | 5-3 | -0.1 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 71.0 | 30.1 | 44.6% | 39.6 | 65.1 | 31.7 | 39.0% | 31.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.5 | 34.3 | 27-58 | 47.5% | 7-19 | 39.5% | 11-18 | 63.1% | 40 | 11 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65 | 29.9 | 23-55 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 12-18 | 67.9% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.0 | 35.6 | 28-58 | 48.0% | 7-18 | 37.1% | 13-21 | 62.3% | 41 | 12 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.1 | 28.0 | 21-54 | 38.2% | 6-19 | 30.4% | 15-21 | 71.7% | 31 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.1 | 32.2 | 24-53 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 14-20 | 70.7% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.6 | 22.8 | 20-55 | 35.9% | 6-21 | 29.0% | 13-19 | 70.6% | 31 | 7 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MICHIGAN 76.3, MICHIGAN ST 74.3 |
| | |
|
|
12/13/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 53-80 | L | 10.5 | L | 128 | O | 19-54 | 35.2% | 26 | 12 | 32-55 | 58.2% | 40 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | SMU | 51-62 | L | -1.5 | L | 128.5 | U | 17-54 | 31.5% | 27 | 14 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 44 | 20 | 12/22/2014 | COPPIN ST | 71-56 | W | -26 | L | 148 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 43 | 12 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 31 | 11 | 12/30/2014 | ILLINOIS | 73-65 | W | -3 | W | 133.5 | O | 27-66 | 40.9% | 39 | 5 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 36 | 12 | 1/3/2015 | @ PURDUE | 51-62 | L | 3.5 | L | 130.5 | U | 15-47 | 31.9% | 22 | 11 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 44 | 14 | 1/6/2015 | @ PENN ST | 73-64 | W | 1.5 | W | 128 | O | 24-45 | 53.3% | 31 | 15 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 26 | 10 | 1/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | 62-57 | W | -2 | W | 133 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 31 | 9 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 37 | 17 | 1/13/2015 | @ OHIO ST | 52-71 | L | 9.5 | L | 129.5 | U | 20-59 | 33.9% | 33 | 13 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 36 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | NORTHWESTERN | 56-54 | W | -9 | L | 121 | U | 20-58 | 34.5% | 29 | 3 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 38 | 12 | 1/20/2015 | @ RUTGERS | 54-50 | W | 2.5 | W | 120 | U | 17-49 | 34.7% | 34 | 11 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 35 | 11 | 1/24/2015 | WISCONSIN | 64-69 | L | 10.5 | W | 120.5 | O | 23-54 | 42.6% | 33 | 9 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 30 | 8 | 1/27/2015 | NEBRASKA | 58-44 | W | -2 | W | 115 | U | 22-46 | 47.8% | 34 | 13 | 15-49 | 30.6% | 26 | 10 | 2/1/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2015 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/14/2014 | OAKLAND | 87-61 | W | -18.5 | W | 143.5 | O | 34-61 | 55.7% | 37 | 8 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 32 | 15 | 12/17/2014 | E MICHIGAN | 66-46 | W | -13.5 | W | 127 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 47 | 12 | 14-62 | 22.6% | 39 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 64-71 | L | -24.5 | L | 135 | P | 24-61 | 39.3% | 40 | 13 | 25-47 | 53.2% | 28 | 11 | 12/22/2014 | THE CITADEL | 82-56 | W | -23.5 | W | | - | 32-53 | 60.4% | 34 | 10 | 20-48 | 41.7% | 19 | 15 | 12/30/2014 | MARYLAND | 66-68 | L | -5.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 21-65 | 32.3% | 36 | 13 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 52 | 21 | 1/5/2015 | INDIANA | 70-50 | W | -8 | W | 144.5 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 50 | 11 | 17-60 | 28.3% | 28 | 6 | 1/8/2015 | @ IOWA | 75-61 | W | 3 | W | 129 | O | 27-53 | 50.9% | 35 | 11 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 29 | 9 | 1/11/2015 | NORTHWESTERN | 84-77 | W | -14 | L | 123 | O | 31-62 | 50.0% | 32 | 7 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 31 | 14 | 1/17/2015 | @ MARYLAND | 59-75 | L | 1.5 | L | 130 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 34 | 12 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 34 | 8 | 1/21/2015 | PENN ST | 66-60 | W | -12 | L | 134.5 | U | 23-54 | 42.6% | 39 | 13 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 26 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 77-79 | L | -2 | L | 119.5 | O | 27-66 | 40.9% | 48 | 16 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 26 | 10 | 1/29/2015 | @ RUTGERS | 71-51 | W | -8.5 | W | 130 | U | 27-53 | 50.9% | 43 | 17 | 16-55 | 29.1% | 28 | 10 | 2/1/2015 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MICHIGAN: No team in the Big Ten lost as many key players as the Wolverines did. These subtractions will force SG Caris LeVert (12.9 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 2.9 APG) to pick up the slack as the go-to scorer. LeVert is an excellent shooter, knocking down 41% threes last season, and he has the ability to get his shot off at any time. While he is a big threat to hit from deep, he can also put the ball on the floor and get to the rim. LeVert will have to score the ball more this season to give the Wolverines a chance to win, and he is capable of becoming an all-conference performer. PG Derrick Walton Jr. (7.9 PPG, 3.0 RPG, 2.9 APG) had his ups and downs as a freshman, but showed that he has a chance to be a star. In a game against rival Michigan State, Walton had 19 points and six rebounds in an upset road victory. The Wolverines could have one of the best backcourts in the country, as sophomore SG Zak Irvin (6.7 PPG, 43% threes) could play a role similar to what LeVert did last season. Michigan will have to get some scoring from the interior if it is going to emerge as a Big Ten contender. | | MICHIGAN ST: The Spartans have lost a lot from last year's Elite Eight team, but there are still some pieces for head coach Tom Izzo to build on for another great season. F/G Branden Dawson (11.2 PPG, 8.3 RPG, 1.3 SPG) is one of the most versatile players in the country. He can have a big night on the offensive end, but he is also capable of a double-digit rebounding game by dominating the glass. This year, he will have to take on more of a scoring role, as the Spartans will have to replace a majority of their points. The backcourt of PG Denzel Valentine (8.0 PPG, 6.0 RPG, 3.8 APG) and SG Travis Trice (7.3 PPG, 2.3 APG and 1.6 RPG) are two solid guards who must provide the Spartans leadership and a calming presence on the field. Freshman G/F Javon Bess made some noise in the offseason, as he was playing very well in scrimmages. He is a guy who is physically ready to play as a freshman, and he could be contributing very early in his career. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 9/23/2024 8:26:30 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|