|
|
MICHIGAN First Half Results MICHIGAN ST |
|
| 62 | 24 Final 38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
531 | MICHIGAN | -1 | 532 | MICHIGAN ST | 61.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 21-3 | +6 | 13-9 | 13-10 | 77.0 | 36.7 | 49.8% | 36.3 | 60.4 | 28.1 | 41.3% | 30.0 | Road Games | 7-3 | +4 | 6-4 | 7-3 | 73.2 | 34.0 | 48.8% | 34.2 | 65.4 | 30.4 | 43.5% | 31.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 70.6 | 32.4 | 46.0% | 33.2 | 65.2 | 28.6 | 44.2% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 8-3 | +1 | 5-5 | 6-5 | 73.5 | 34.0 | 48.2% | 35.0 | 62.7 | 29.5 | 42.7% | 31.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 36.7 | 29-58 | 49.8% | 8-20 | 40.7% | 11-15 | 70.2% | 36 | 9 | 15 | 12 | 6 | 9 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.4 | 30 | 23-55 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 12-18 | 68.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.2 | 34.0 | 27-56 | 48.8% | 7-18 | 36.6% | 11-16 | 70.1% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.4 | 28.1 | 23-56 | 41.3% | 7-20 | 32.0% | 8-12 | 65.6% | 30 | 8 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.9 | 32 | 24-56 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 13-20 | 68.4% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.4 | 30.4 | 24-54 | 43.5% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 11-16 | 69.6% | 31 | 9 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 20-4 | +5.6 | 10-11 | 10-10 | 69.7 | 32.1 | 46.8% | 37.4 | 59.2 | 28.2 | 39.0% | 30.8 | Home Games | 14-0 | +5 | 5-6 | 5-5 | 72.7 | 32.4 | 48.8% | 39.2 | 55.5 | 25.7 | 35.0% | 30.4 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.8 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 67.6 | 28.2 | 46.8% | 31.8 | 62.4 | 30.4 | 41.9% | 31.0 | Conference Games | 9-2 | +6.8 | 7-4 | 7-4 | 68.5 | 30.0 | 45.5% | 34.0 | 62.9 | 30.2 | 43.4% | 31.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.7 | 32.1 | 25-53 | 46.8% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 15-20 | 71.4% | 37 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.4 | 29.4 | 23-56 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.7 | 32.4 | 25-51 | 48.8% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 17-24 | 72.5% | 39 | 9 | 15 | 15 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.2 | 28.2 | 21-53 | 39.0% | 5-17 | 31.3% | 12-19 | 64.0% | 31 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.1 | 31.7 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 68.3% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 55.5 | 25.7 | 19-55 | 35.0% | 5-19 | 29.1% | 11-18 | 63.0% | 30 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MICHIGAN 75.3, MICHIGAN ST 74.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/2012 | C MICHIGAN | 88-73 | W | -26 | L | 138 | O | 35-68 | 51.5% | 29 | 3 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 38 | 15 | 1/3/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 94-66 | W | -9.5 | W | 128.5 | O | 34-57 | 59.6% | 41 | 12 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 25 | 12 | 1/6/2013 | IOWA | 95-67 | W | -13.5 | W | 144.5 | O | 36-62 | 58.1% | 41 | 6 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 26 | 7 | 1/9/2013 | NEBRASKA | 62-47 | W | -21 | L | 127.5 | U | 21-54 | 38.9% | 47 | 5 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 30 | 6 | 1/13/2013 | @ OHIO ST | 53-56 | L | 1.5 | L | 137.5 | U | 18-47 | 38.3% | 30 | 13 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 30 | 12 | 1/17/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-75 | W | 2.5 | W | 139 | O | 28-51 | 54.9% | 25 | 12 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 33 | 15 | 1/24/2013 | PURDUE | 68-53 | W | -15 | T | 135 | U | 27-55 | 49.1% | 35 | 10 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 29 | 12 | 1/27/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | 74-60 | W | -5.5 | W | 139.5 | U | 31-59 | 52.5% | 35 | 12 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 36 | 15 | 1/30/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | 68-46 | W | -15.5 | W | 128 | U | 25-49 | 51.0% | 31 | 2 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 29 | 8 | 2/2/2013 | @ INDIANA | 73-81 | L | 5.5 | L | 145 | O | 30-70 | 42.9% | 29 | 8 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 38 | 16 | 2/5/2013 | OHIO ST | 76-74 | W | -7 | L | 131.5 | O | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 11 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 30 | 11 | 2/9/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | 62-65 | L | -2 | L | 123 | O | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 7 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 14 | 2/12/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2013 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-76 | L | 6.5 | L | 128.5 | O | 28-63 | 44.4% | 32 | 14 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 39 | 16 | 1/5/2013 | PURDUE | 84-61 | W | -11.5 | W | 125.5 | O | 29-64 | 45.3% | 44 | 12 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 35 | 10 | 1/10/2013 | @ IOWA | 62-59 | W | -2 | W | 136 | U | 23-57 | 40.4% | 36 | 12 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 35 | 18 | 1/13/2013 | NEBRASKA | 66-56 | W | -17 | L | 118 | O | 22-48 | 45.8% | 36 | 11 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 31 | 12 | 1/16/2013 | @ PENN ST | 81-72 | W | -10.5 | L | 125 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 33 | 7 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 30 | 8 | 1/19/2013 | OHIO ST | 59-56 | W | -1 | W | 132.5 | U | 22-50 | 44.0% | 34 | 13 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 25 | 14 | 1/22/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | 49-47 | W | 5 | W | 123 | U | 18-47 | 38.3% | 35 | 10 | 16-54 | 29.6% | 35 | 9 | 1/27/2013 | @ INDIANA | 70-75 | L | 10 | W | 135.5 | O | 27-60 | 45.0% | 32 | 19 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 31 | 16 | 1/31/2013 | ILLINOIS | 80-75 | W | -8.5 | L | 134 | O | 25-42 | 59.5% | 33 | 14 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 24 | 8 | 2/6/2013 | MINNESOTA | 61-50 | W | -3.5 | W | 130 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 28 | 5 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 38 | 12 | 2/9/2013 | @ PURDUE | 78-65 | W | -3.5 | W | 127.5 | O | 27-55 | 49.1% | 31 | 9 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 27 | 14 | 2/12/2013 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2013 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MICHIGAN: John Beilein guided this team to a tie for first in last year's conference and even though just two starters are back, there is no shortage of ready-to-go talent on this Wolverines squad. While the team will really miss Zack Novak and Evan Smotryczk, last year's two leading scorers are back in the fold in Trey Burke (14.8 PPG, 4.6 APG) and Tim Hardaway Jr. (14.6 PPG), forming the conference's most dangerous backcourt duo as excellent dribble-drivers who combined to average nearly 3.5 three-pointers per game. Forward Jordan Morgan (7.3 PPG, 5.6 RPG) will remain a key role player while freshman SF Glenn Robinson III may be prove to be the most college-ready first-year player in the conference. With freshman Mitch McGary manning the post at 6-foot-10, this is a complete roster that has the ideal mix of veterans and young talent to still be balling in late March. | | MICHIGAN ST: Tom Izzo's squads will always compete, and Izzo squads with this much talent have the potential to be special. Last year's centerpiece Draymond Green is gone, but there is a plethora of talent waiting in the wings to take this team past last year's Big Ten regular season title that they shared with Michigan. Junior guard Keith Appling (11.4 PPG, 3.9 APG) is primed for a breakout season as the go-to guy while sophomore swingman Branden Dawson (8.4 PPG, 4.5 RPG) was second on the team in rebounding as a freshman and presents significant matchup issues with his athletic 6-foot-6 frame. Six-foot-10 center Adreian Payne (7.0 PPG, 4.2 RPG) should also be prepared to handle a bigger role after making the most of his 17.9 MPG last season as well. And watch out for freshman shooting guard Gary Harris, who not only can score, but will provide MSU with a lockdown defender, which is vital in this conference with such talented guard play. |
|
|
Follow Larry Lage on Twitter: http://twitter.com/larrylage
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 9:32:49 PM EST. |
|
|