|
|
PURDUE First Half Results MICHIGAN ST |
|
| 58.5 | 30 Final 36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
525 | PURDUE | 59 | 526 | MICHIGAN ST | -6.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-6 | -10.4 | 5-8 | 4-5 | 67.2 | 32.0 | 41.9% | 41.7 | 61.0 | 27.9 | 38.6% | 33.0 | Road Games | 1-4 | -7.8 | 1-4 | 3-1 | 64.8 | 30.0 | 38.8% | 42.8 | 68.8 | 30.8 | 39.6% | 37.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -4.6 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 63.8 | 29.6 | 40.6% | 39.0 | 62.2 | 30.4 | 39.8% | 33.8 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1.4 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 68.0 | 31.0 | 41.0% | 45.0 | 61.0 | 33.0 | 35.6% | 35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.2 | 32.0 | 25-59 | 41.9% | 4-15 | 27.9% | 13-20 | 65.8% | 42 | 12 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.2 | 29.8 | 24-57 | 41.1% | 6-19 | 32.3% | 12-18 | 68.0% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.8 | 30.0 | 23-60 | 38.8% | 5-17 | 30.2% | 13-21 | 63.5% | 43 | 12 | 13 | 23 | 5 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.0 | 27.9 | 21-55 | 38.6% | 5-16 | 30.5% | 13-20 | 67.6% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.7 | 24-54 | 44.0% | 5-16 | 34.5% | 14-21 | 68.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.8 | 30.8 | 23-57 | 39.6% | 5-18 | 28.6% | 18-27 | 67.2% | 38 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-3 | -2.2 | 3-8 | 4-6 | 70.2 | 34.2 | 47.6% | 39.6 | 57.5 | 27.5 | 36.9% | 30.6 | Home Games | 9-0 | +1 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 74.2 | 34.6 | 49.7% | 41.6 | 53.2 | 23.9 | 32.0% | 30.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 71.8 | 32.6 | 46.0% | 40.4 | 60.4 | 31.8 | 37.5% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 63.0 | 38.0 | 44.4% | 32.0 | 76.0 | 39.0 | 56.6% | 39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.2 | 34.2 | 26-54 | 47.6% | 5-14 | 32.0% | 14-20 | 70.6% | 40 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.4 | 30.1 | 24-57 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 32.0% | 14-20 | 70.3% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.2 | 34.6 | 26-52 | 49.7% | 5-15 | 30.2% | 18-24 | 73.1% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 9 | 16 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 57.5 | 27.5 | 20-54 | 36.9% | 5-16 | 30.9% | 13-19 | 65.9% | 31 | 8 | 11 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.3 | 31.1 | 24-57 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 13-20 | 67.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 53.2 | 23.9 | 18-55 | 32.0% | 5-18 | 26.7% | 13-20 | 63.9% | 30 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: PURDUE 71.9, MICHIGAN ST 72.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/16/2012 | *OREGON ST | 58-66 | L | -1 | L | 145.5 | U | 22-65 | 33.8% | 36 | 11 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 47 | 17 | 11/21/2012 | UNC-WILMINGTON | 66-40 | W | -20 | W | 137 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 40 | 16 | 15-46 | 32.6% | 24 | 18 | 11/28/2012 | @ CLEMSON | 73-61 | W | 4 | W | 124.5 | O | 25-49 | 51.0% | 41 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 27 | 5 | 12/1/2012 | XAVIER | 57-63 | L | -6.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 21-60 | 35.0% | 44 | 12 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 29 | 10 | 12/4/2012 | LAMAR | 72-39 | W | -22.5 | W | 138 | U | 28-62 | 45.2% | 50 | 12 | 17-56 | 30.4% | 31 | 16 | 12/8/2012 | @ E MICHIGAN | 44-47 | L | -10.5 | L | | - | 14-47 | 29.8% | 51 | 18 | 17-55 | 30.9% | 33 | 5 | 12/15/2012 | *NOTRE DAME | 68-81 | L | 7.5 | L | 124.5 | O | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 15 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 38 | 12 | 12/18/2012 | BALL ST | 66-56 | W | -15 | L | | - | 23-52 | 44.2% | 33 | 9 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 32 | 17 | 12/29/2012 | WM & MARY | 73-66 | W | -11.5 | L | | - | 28-62 | 45.2% | 33 | 7 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 31 | 13 | 1/2/2013 | ILLINOIS | 68-61 | W | 3 | W | 138.5 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 45 | 11 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 35 | 10 | 1/5/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2013 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/24/2013 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/18/2012 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 69-41 | W | | - | | - | 28-60 | 46.7% | 46 | 12 | 12-57 | 21.1% | 39 | 15 | 11/20/2012 | BOISE ST | 74-70 | W | -15.5 | L | 135.5 | O | 26-45 | 57.8% | 28 | 15 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 24 | 14 | 11/23/2012 | OAKLAND | 70-52 | W | -17.5 | W | 147 | U | 26-49 | 53.1% | 43 | 20 | 16-56 | 28.6% | 28 | 11 | 11/25/2012 | LA-LAFAYETTE | 63-60 | W | -22.5 | L | | - | 20-47 | 42.6% | 40 | 20 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 28 | 15 | 11/28/2012 | @ MIAMI | 59-67 | L | 1.5 | L | 133.5 | U | 24-59 | 40.7% | 37 | 12 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 28 | 9 | 12/1/2012 | NICHOLLS ST | 84-39 | W | | - | | - | 33-55 | 60.0% | 40 | 8 | 15-51 | 29.4% | 25 | 18 | 12/5/2012 | ARK-PINE BLUFF | 76-44 | W | -30.5 | W | 125.5 | U | 28-56 | 50.0% | 45 | 19 | 15-54 | 27.8% | 31 | 20 | 12/8/2012 | LOYOLA-IL | 73-61 | W | -16 | L | 123.5 | O | 22-45 | 48.9% | 33 | 12 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 31 | 12 | 12/15/2012 | TUSKEGEE INSTU | 92-56 | W | | - | | - | 30-67 | 44.8% | 63 | 22 | 21-72 | 29.2% | 35 | 17 | 12/18/2012 | @ BOWLING GREEN | 64-53 | W | -12 | L | 122.5 | U | 26-54 | 48.1% | 38 | 15 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 35 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | TEXAS | 67-56 | W | -12 | L | 126 | U | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 16 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 32 | 18 | 12/31/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 63-76 | L | 6.5 | L | 128.5 | O | 28-63 | 44.4% | 32 | 14 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 39 | 16 | 1/5/2013 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2013 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| PURDUE: The new-look Boilermakers were able to grind their way to a 10-8 mark in the Big Ten, but will struggle to do so again without last year's two leading scorers Robbie Hummel and Lewis Jackson. Terone Jackson (9.2 PPG) was effective in spurts last year at guard and will certainly see more than the 23.7 MPG he played last year. Six-foot-5 swingman D.J. Byrd (8.9 PPG, 43% 3-pt FG) is the other key player returning from last year's squad. Head coach Matt Painter also adds three solid recruits in 7-foot center A.J. Hammons, 6-foot-5 shooting guard Rapheal Davis and point guard Ronnie Johnson, who should all receive significant minutes in their first years. | | MICHIGAN ST: Tom Izzo's squads will always compete, and Izzo squads with this much talent have the potential to be special. Last year's centerpiece Draymond Green is gone, but there is a plethora of talent waiting in the wings to take this team past last year's Big Ten regular season title that they shared with Michigan. Junior guard Keith Appling (11.4 PPG, 3.9 APG) is primed for a breakout season as the go-to guy while sophomore swingman Branden Dawson (8.4 PPG, 4.5 RPG) was second on the team in rebounding as a freshman and presents significant matchup issues with his athletic 6-foot-6 frame. Six-foot-10 center Adreian Payne (7.0 PPG, 4.2 RPG) should also be prepared to handle a bigger role after making the most of his 17.9 MPG last season as well. And watch out for freshman shooting guard Gary Harris, who not only can score, but will provide MSU with a lockdown defender, which is vital in this conference with such talented guard play. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 7:51:55 PM EST. |
|
|