|
|
TEXAS A&M
First Half Results
MICHIGAN |
|
|
63.5
| 28
Final
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NCAA - West Regional Semifinals - Staples Center - Los Angeles, CA |
|
|  | |
| 817 | TEXAS A&M | 64 | | 818 | MICHIGAN | -1.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 22-12 | +4.3 | 15-16 | 16-15 | 75.3 | 35.2 | 46.0% | 41.6 | 69.6 | 32.4 | 40.2% | 35.1 | | Road Games | 9-9 | +2.9 | 10-8 | 10-8 | 73.1 | 34.2 | 45.6% | 40.4 | 72.2 | 33.9 | 41.8% | 33.6 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 71.6 | 31.8 | 43.2% | 46.2 | 66.2 | 28.6 | 38.6% | 35.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 75.3 | 35.2 | 28-60 | 46.0% | 7-20 | 33.1% | 13-20 | 66.4% | 42 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 5 | 14 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 72.4 | 33.5 | 25-59 | 43.2% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 71.0% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.1 | 34.2 | 27-60 | 45.6% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 12-18 | 68.1% | 40 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.6 | 32.4 | 25-62 | 40.2% | 7-23 | 31.9% | 12-17 | 68.6% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 76.4 | 36.1 | 27-59 | 45.2% | 8-22 | 35.2% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.2 | 33.9 | 26-61 | 41.8% | 7-23 | 32.0% | 14-19 | 72.2% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 30-7 | +17.4 | 23-13 | 18-18 | 73.8 | 34.7 | 46.7% | 33.5 | 63.1 | 28.8 | 42.5% | 32.8 | | Road Games | 15-6 | +9.4 | 14-7 | 13-8 | 73.6 | 36.7 | 46.1% | 33.6 | 66.6 | 30.2 | 43.6% | 33.1 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +6.3 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 70.4 | 31.4 | 43.6% | 35.4 | 59.6 | 28.4 | 36.7% | 35.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 73.8 | 34.7 | 27-57 | 46.7% | 9-25 | 36.5% | 12-18 | 65.9% | 33 | 8 | 15 | 16 | 6 | 9 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 71.5 | 33.4 | 26-59 | 43.6% | 8-21 | 35.2% | 13-18 | 70.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.6 | 36.7 | 26-56 | 46.1% | 8-23 | 36.6% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 9 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.1 | 28.8 | 23-54 | 42.5% | 6-16 | 33.7% | 12-16 | 71.3% | 33 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 75 | 35.3 | 27-59 | 45.5% | 8-21 | 35.9% | 14-19 | 71.6% | 36 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.6 | 30.2 | 24-54 | 43.6% | 6-17 | 32.8% | 14-19 | 73.1% | 33 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TEXAS A&M 80.1, MICHIGAN 77.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/3/2018 | S CAROLINA | 83-60 | W | -7 | W | 138 | O | 29-55 | 52.7% | 38 | 11 | 19-69 | 27.5% | 42 | 12 | | 2/7/2018 | @ AUBURN | 81-80 | W | 6 | W | 154 | O | 33-61 | 54.1% | 33 | 16 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 22 | 14 | | 2/10/2018 | KENTUCKY | 85-74 | W | -5.5 | W | 141.5 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 9 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 12 | | 2/13/2018 | @ MISSOURI | 58-62 | L | 2.5 | L | 138 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 46 | 16 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 30 | 9 | | 2/17/2018 | @ ARKANSAS | 75-94 | L | 3 | L | 148.5 | O | 24-55 | 43.6% | 33 | 13 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 45 | 9 | | 2/20/2018 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 81-93 | L | -6.5 | L | 138.5 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 31 | 9 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 44 | 9 | | 2/24/2018 | @ VANDERBILT | 89-81 | W | -1.5 | W | 143 | O | 30-51 | 58.8% | 32 | 9 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 33 | 12 | | 2/28/2018 | @ GEORGIA | 61-60 | W | 1 | W | 136 | U | 24-64 | 37.5% | 47 | 11 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 44 | 10 | | 3/3/2018 | ALABAMA | 68-66 | W | -5 | L | 142 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 46 | 12 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 40 | 13 | | 3/8/2018 | *ALABAMA | 70-71 | L | -3 | L | 137 | O | 24-61 | 39.3% | 44 | 17 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 33 | 14 | | 3/16/2018 | *PROVIDENCE | 73-69 | W | -2.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 26-52 | 50.0% | 44 | 14 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 26 | 6 | | 3/18/2018 | *N CAROLINA | 86-65 | W | 7 | W | 152 | U | 31-60 | 51.7% | 50 | 14 | 26-78 | 33.3% | 36 | 6 | | 3/22/2018 | *MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2/3/2018 | MINNESOTA | 76-73 | W | -12.5 | L | 138 | O | 28-63 | 44.4% | 43 | 6 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 6 | | 2/6/2018 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 52-61 | L | -1.5 | L | 128 | U | 17-44 | 38.6% | 27 | 9 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 32 | 6 | | 2/11/2018 | @ WISCONSIN | 83-72 | W | -4 | W | 124.5 | O | 28-50 | 56.0% | 33 | 8 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 23 | 8 | | 2/14/2018 | IOWA | 74-59 | W | -11 | W | 146.5 | U | 28-67 | 41.8% | 33 | 6 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 33 | 16 | | 2/18/2018 | OHIO ST | 74-62 | W | -3.5 | W | 131 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 30 | 7 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 40 | 14 | | 2/21/2018 | @ PENN ST | 72-63 | W | 4 | W | 134 | O | 23-51 | 45.1% | 34 | 12 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 33 | 10 | | 2/24/2018 | @ MARYLAND | 85-61 | W | -1 | W | 134 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 31 | 8 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 35 | 11 | | 3/1/2018 | *IOWA | 77-71 | W | -9 | L | 147 | O | 28-62 | 45.2% | 42 | 9 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 44 | 14 | | 3/2/2018 | *NEBRASKA | 77-58 | W | -5 | W | 133 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 9 | 16-53 | 30.2% | 34 | 10 | | 3/3/2018 | *MICHIGAN ST | 75-64 | W | 5 | W | 135.5 | O | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 9 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 33 | 8 | | 3/4/2018 | *PURDUE | 75-66 | W | 4 | W | 140 | O | 26-52 | 50.0% | 26 | 5 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 38 | 11 | | 3/15/2018 | *MONTANA | 61-47 | W | -10 | W | 134 | U | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 14 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 33 | 12 | | 3/17/2018 | *HOUSTON | 64-63 | W | -3.5 | L | 135.5 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 7 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 41 | 10 | | 3/22/2018 | *TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | TEXAS A&M: Last season: 16-15.
Who's gone: G J.C. Hampton, F Tavario Miller.
Who's back: F Robert Williams. A projected NBA lottery pick, Williams chose to return for his sophomore season instead of entering the draft. He looks to build off a solid freshman season where he averaged 11.9 points and 8.2 rebounds. The 6-foot-10 Williams led the SEC with 46 blocked shots during league play and was second in rebounds a game with 9.6 during conference play. He had 22 games with multiple blocks. C Tyler Davis. The junior led the SEC and ranked 14th in the nation by making 62.9 percent of his field goals last season. The 6-foot-10 Davis averaged 14.1 points and seven rebounds a game last year.
Who's new: G Duane Wilson. The graduate transfer played at Marquette for three seasons where he made 51 starts and averaged 8.8 points and 2.3 rebounds; G/F Savion Flagg. The freshman averaged 31.3 points, 11.1 rebounds, 5.9 assists, 1.9 steals and 1.4 blocks a game in his last year in high school and was named the fourth-best player in Texas by ESPN.
The Skinny: After failing to make the NIT last season after reaching the Sweet 16 in 2016, the Aggies have the talent to return to the NCAA Tournament this season. The key will be the continued development of Williams and if Wilson or J.J. Caldwell can step in to provide an upgrade at point guard. | | MICHIGAN: Last season: 26-12, won Big Ten Tournament and reached NCAA Sweet 16.
Who's gone: G Derrick Walton, F D.J. Wilson, G-F Zak Irvin, F Mark Donnal.
Who's back: F Moe Wagner. After considering jump to NBA, Wagner is back at Michigan as team's top returning player; G Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman. Enters senior season with plenty of experience after starting 37 games in 2016-17; G-F Duncan Robinson. Shot 44 percent from 3-point range in first two seasons at Michigan. G Zavier Simpson. Averaged 8.7 minutes a game as freshman last season, backing up Walton.
Who's new: G Jaaron Simmons. Graduate transfer from Ohio averaged 17.2 points last season for one of top teams in Mid-American Conference; G Charles Matthews. Kentucky transfer now eligible after sitting out last season, could give Michigan some athleticism on wing. G Eli Brooks. Averaged 29.7 points as high school senior in 2016-17.
The Skinny: Michigan has a lot to replace, but Simmons and Matthews already have Division I experience, so the transition may not be too bumpy for Beilein's team. Losing Wilson to the NBA was a blow, but Wagner's return means the Wolverines are still a team to watch in the Big Ten. Their early schedule is an intriguing one with trips to North Carolina and Texas and a home game against UCLA. |
|
error '80070070'/includes/foxsheetfunctions.asp, line 397
|