|
|
WASHINGTON First Half Results LONG BEACH ST |
|
| 65.5 | 38 Final 39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WOODEN LEGACY - Round 2 - Titan Gym - Fullerton, CA |
|
| | |
779 | WASHINGTON | 65.5 | 780 | LONG BEACH ST | -1.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-0 | +2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 73.5 | 33.7 | 43.9% | 44.7 | 58.0 | 24.0 | 32.8% | 38.2 | Road Games | 3-0 | +2 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 72.3 | 32.0 | 42.6% | 42.7 | 57.7 | 24.3 | 32.8% | 38.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-0 | +2 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 73.5 | 33.7 | 43.9% | 44.7 | 58.0 | 24.0 | 32.8% | 38.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.5 | 33.7 | 27-61 | 43.9% | 6-22 | 29.5% | 13-22 | 62.1% | 45 | 12 | 15 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 8 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.2 | 31.6 | 24-58 | 41.5% | 7-20 | 33.2% | 14-21 | 66.3% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.3 | 32.0 | 25-59 | 42.6% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 15-23 | 62.9% | 43 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.0 | 24.0 | 21-65 | 32.8% | 5-19 | 25.3% | 10-17 | 61.2% | 38 | 12 | 8 | 19 | 6 | 10 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 64.7 | 31.5 | 24-58 | 40.3% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 57.7 | 24.3 | 21-63 | 32.8% | 5-18 | 25.5% | 12-18 | 64.8% | 39 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | +0.2 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 73.8 | 35.5 | 49.5% | 34.7 | 74.7 | 37.2 | 41.6% | 34.5 | Road Games | 1-3 | -1 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 75.0 | 36.7 | 50.0% | 34.0 | 81.0 | 42.2 | 43.9% | 34.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 70.6 | 33.2 | 48.3% | 35.8 | 70.6 | 35.4 | 39.7% | 34.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.8 | 35.5 | 24-49 | 49.5% | 8-19 | 42.9% | 17-26 | 64.7% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 17 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 71.4 | 33.2 | 24-54 | 44.9% | 8-20 | 37.8% | 15-22 | 69.5% | 32 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.0 | 36.7 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 8-20 | 40.7% | 14-22 | 63.3% | 34 | 7 | 12 | 21 | 7 | 18 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.7 | 37.2 | 25-60 | 41.6% | 8-26 | 31.8% | 16-22 | 75.0% | 34 | 11 | 15 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 79 | 37.7 | 28-59 | 47.4% | 8-20 | 38.3% | 16-23 | 67.6% | 36 | 11 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.0 | 42.2 | 27-61 | 43.9% | 9-26 | 33.7% | 19-24 | 76.5% | 34 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 63, LONG BEACH ST 75.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | S CAROLINA ST | 77-59 | W | -23.5 | L | 148 | U | 32-68 | 47.1% | 51 | 12 | 24-73 | 32.9% | 37 | 8 | 11/21/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 63-48 | W | | - | | - | 22-59 | 37.3% | 40 | 11 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 45 | 13 | 11/23/2014 | *PACIFIC | 76-69 | W | -13 | L | 134 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 40 | 10 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 32 | 9 | 11/27/2014 | *SAN JOSE ST | 78-56 | W | -11.5 | W | 133 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 48 | 14 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 39 | 12 | 11/28/2014 | *LONG BEACH ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2014 | SAN DIEGO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/14/2014 | E WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/17/2014 | GRAMBLING | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2014 | *OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | @ BYU | 90-95 | L | 13.5 | W | | - | 33-61 | 54.1% | 29 | 18 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 33 | 17 | 11/15/2014 | SAN FRANCISCO ST | 74-64 | W | | - | | - | 22-41 | 53.7% | 32 | 12 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 30 | 11 | 11/18/2014 | @ XAVIER | 74-97 | L | 11 | L | 147 | O | 29-53 | 54.7% | 27 | 15 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 32 | 7 | 11/21/2014 | KANSAS ST | 69-60 | W | 2.5 | W | 140.5 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 40 | 18 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 39 | 15 | 11/23/2014 | @ UCLA | 63-77 | L | 10 | L | 152.5 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 39 | 19 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 38 | 5 | 11/27/2014 | *W MICHIGAN | 73-55 | W | -3 | W | 142 | U | 23-49 | 46.9% | 41 | 19 | 18-59 | 30.5% | 35 | 22 | 11/28/2014 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/3/2014 | NEVADA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2014 | @ SF AUSTIN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/10/2014 | @ SAN DIEGO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2014 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| WASHINGTON: The Huskies have had some struggles the past couple seasons, but have some potential to surprise people in the Pac-12. PG Nigel Williams-Goss (13.4 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 4.4 APG) is an ultra-talented floor leader that will have to become more of a scorer to help make up for the loss of C.J. Wilcox. At 6-foot-3, he has great size for the point, but will have to cut back on the turnovers. His partner in the backcourt is SG Andrew Andrews (12.3 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 2.6 APG), who is another combo guard who can go for 20 points on any given night. Both of these guys are very fast with the ball, and they put a lot of pressure on opposing defenses. The Huskies ranked 189th in the nation in rebounding, but teams can't crash the offensive glass because they have to get back to stop the fast break. For Washington to contend for an NCAA Tournament berth, PF Shawn Kemp Jr. (4.4 PPG, 1.8 RPG, 56% FG, 71% FT) must become more of a presence down low. If he is able to help the team rebound the ball, Washington could make a surprising run in the conference. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 6/18/2024 3:27:19 AM EST. |
|
|