| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
PITTSBURGH KANSAS ST |
|
| 129 | 70 Final 47 |
|
|
| | |
|
MAUI INVITATIONAL - Final Rnd - Lahaina Civic Center - Maui, HI | | | | |
767 | PITTSBURGH | +8.5 | Over 126 | 768 | KANSAS ST | -0.5 | Under 134 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | -9.5 | 1-3 | 1-0 | 69.8 | 36.0 | 46.0% | 37.4 | 63.4 | 31.0 | 43.5% | 24.6 | Road Games | 1-2 | -9.5 | 0-2 | 1-0 | 69.3 | 34.3 | 42.5% | 39.3 | 72.0 | 36.7 | 54.1% | 21.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -9.5 | 1-3 | 1-0 | 69.8 | 36.0 | 46.0% | 37.4 | 63.4 | 31.0 | 43.5% | 24.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.8 | 36.0 | 26-56 | 46.0% | 6-16 | 36.6% | 13-17 | 73.3% | 37 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 71.9 | 34.4 | 25-57 | 44.3% | 7-18 | 37.5% | 15-21 | 69.7% | 38 | 12 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.3 | 34.3 | 25-58 | 42.5% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 13-18 | 72.7% | 39 | 17 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.4 | 31.0 | 22-51 | 43.5% | 6-19 | 30.5% | 14-19 | 72.3% | 25 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67 | 31.9 | 23-55 | 41.2% | 7-20 | 32.3% | 15-22 | 67.0% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.0 | 36.7 | 26-49 | 54.1% | 7-19 | 36.2% | 12-18 | 69.8% | 21 | 6 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | -1.3 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 79.4 | 35.0 | 48.9% | 30.2 | 72.2 | 32.8 | 48.0% | 30.2 | Road Games | 1-2 | -1.3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 72.0 | 31.7 | 43.5% | 31.7 | 73.3 | 29.3 | 50.7% | 32.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.3 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 79.4 | 35.0 | 48.9% | 30.2 | 72.2 | 32.8 | 48.0% | 30.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.4 | 35.0 | 26-53 | 48.9% | 7-16 | 42.7% | 21-30 | 68.4% | 30 | 9 | 15 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 70.3 | 32.1 | 23-53 | 44.2% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 16-24 | 68.7% | 31 | 8 | 13 | 22 | 7 | 16 | 2 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.0 | 31.7 | 25-57 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 17-25 | 68.0% | 32 | 10 | 11 | 23 | 6 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.2 | 32.8 | 23-49 | 48.0% | 7-17 | 39.8% | 19-27 | 68.6% | 30 | 9 | 13 | 23 | 7 | 17 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 73.9 | 35.9 | 25-52 | 48.0% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 18-26 | 66.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.3 | 29.3 | 24-47 | 50.7% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 19-28 | 68.2% | 32 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PITTSBURGH 66.4, KANSAS ST 72 |
| | |
|
|
11/14/2014 | NIAGARA | 78-45 | W | -24.5 | W | | - | 30-57 | 52.6% | 38 | 9 | 12-48 | 25.0% | 27 | 11 | 11/16/2014 | SAMFORD | 63-56 | W | -31 | L | | - | 24-47 | 51.1% | 31 | 11 | 19-59 | 32.2% | 33 | 7 | 11/21/2014 | @ HAWAII | 70-74 | L | -12 | L | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 32 | 8 | 27-51 | 52.9% | 25 | 7 | 11/24/2014 | @ CHAMINADE | 81-68 | W | | - | | - | 29-63 | 46.0% | 51 | 15 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 17 | 13 | 11/25/2014 | *SAN DIEGO ST | 57-74 | L | 3 | L | 119 | O | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 17 | 27-46 | 58.7% | 21 | 9 | 11/26/2014 | *KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2014 | *DUQUESNE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | ST BONAVENTURE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/17/2014 | MANHATTAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/14/2014 | SOUTHERN UTAH | 98-68 | W | -26 | W | | - | 27-46 | 58.7% | 27 | 12 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 32 | 24 | 11/17/2014 | MISSOURI-KC | 83-73 | W | | - | | - | 28-48 | 58.3% | 29 | 17 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 22 | 16 | 11/21/2014 | @ LONG BEACH ST | 60-69 | L | -2.5 | L | 140.5 | U | 20-61 | 32.8% | 39 | 15 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 40 | 18 | 11/24/2014 | *PURDUE | 88-79 | W | 2 | W | 134 | O | 32-60 | 53.3% | 33 | 9 | 28-51 | 54.9% | 27 | 13 | 11/25/2014 | *ARIZONA | 68-72 | L | 9 | W | 135 | O | 22-49 | 44.9% | 23 | 11 | 24-45 | 53.3% | 30 | 12 | 11/26/2014 | *PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2014 | NEBRASKA-OMAHA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2014 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/9/2014 | BRADLEY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/14/2014 | SAVANNAH ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | PITTSBURGH: Pittsburgh saw some success in its first season in the ACC, making the NCAA Tournament before losing to Florida in the Round of 32. SF Durand Johnson (8.8 PPG, 3.0 RPG in 19.8 MPG) is coming back from a torn ACL early last season, and if he is healthy, gives the Panthers a terrific long-range shooter (36% threes in career). The tandem of SG Cameron Wright (10.5 PPG, 3.3 RPG, 2.6 APG) and PG James Robinson (7.6 PPG, 4.1 APG, 3.1 RPG, 1.5 SPG) has a chance to be an excellent backcourt. The Panthers lost 30 points and nearly 14 rebounds from forwards Lamar Patterson and Talib Zanna last season, and the backcourt has the ability to make up a lot of those points. A return trip to the NCAA's could hinge on the play of two sophomores, C Michael Young (6.0 PPG, 4.1 RPG, 36% threes) and PF Jamel Artis (4.9 PPG, 2.9 RPG in 15.4 MPG). | | KANSAS ST: The Wildcats have plenty of optimism heading into the 2014-2015 season, and SG Marcus Foster (15.5 PPG, 3.2 RPG, 40% threes) is the biggest reason why. He was only a three-star prospect entering college, but showed last season that he can be a dangerous offensive weapon that can score in bunches. PF Thomas Gipson (11.2 PPG, 6.5 RPG, 56% FG) is the top threat in the post for the Wildcats. For Gipson, he must continue to stay out of foul trouble, as there is not a lot of frontcourt depth in Manhattan. Another player to look out for is SG Justin Edwards, who transferred in from Maine, where two seasons ago, he averaged 16.7 points, 5.2 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game. With Foster and Edwards, the Wildcats have quite an explosive backcourt. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 1:48:39 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|