|
|
TCU First Half Results IOWA ST |
|
|
| 21 Final 36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-14 | -6.1 | 6-13 | 3-3 | 54.0 | 25.0 | 40.1% | 32.7 | 59.2 | 29.0 | 42.3% | 33.4 | Road Games | 2-7 | +0.1 | 4-5 | 2-2 | 49.7 | 23.0 | 37.8% | 31.3 | 62.3 | 29.6 | 46.4% | 32.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 51.8 | 21.4 | 34.1% | 34.2 | 67.0 | 31.0 | 45.2% | 34.2 | Conference Games | 1-10 | -6.4 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 50.1 | 22.4 | 35.2% | 31.8 | 64.7 | 31.8 | 46.1% | 35.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 54.0 | 25.0 | 20-49 | 40.1% | 3-11 | 29.5% | 12-20 | 59.4% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.4 | 23-55 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 66.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 49.7 | 23.0 | 18-48 | 37.8% | 3-10 | 31.9% | 10-17 | 58.2% | 31 | 9 | 8 | 18 | 5 | 16 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.2 | 29.0 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 11-17 | 66.2% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.6 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 62.3 | 29.6 | 23-49 | 46.4% | 4-13 | 31.4% | 12-18 | 68.7% | 32 | 7 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-8 | -5.1 | 9-10 | 6-2 | 78.6 | 36.5 | 45.1% | 39.6 | 68.8 | 31.1 | 41.8% | 34.2 | Home Games | 13-0 | +6 | 5-3 | 3-1 | 83.0 | 38.2 | 47.3% | 41.5 | 63.4 | 29.2 | 39.2% | 33.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.1 | 3-2 | 3-0 | 78.8 | 37.0 | 45.2% | 34.8 | 76.2 | 32.8 | 45.3% | 35.0 | Conference Games | 6-5 | -4.1 | 7-4 | 5-2 | 74.6 | 34.6 | 44.2% | 35.1 | 70.9 | 31.3 | 44.0% | 36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.6 | 36.5 | 28-62 | 45.1% | 9-26 | 36.4% | 13-19 | 71.2% | 40 | 12 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.3 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 13-20 | 68.4% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.0 | 38.2 | 29-62 | 47.3% | 9-25 | 37.5% | 15-21 | 71.0% | 41 | 12 | 17 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.8 | 31.1 | 25-59 | 41.8% | 6-19 | 30.8% | 13-19 | 71.2% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32.2 | 24-56 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 14-20 | 68.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 63.4 | 29.2 | 24-61 | 39.2% | 6-20 | 28.8% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TCU 72.9, IOWA ST 73.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/30/2012 | MISS VALLEY ST | 67-64 | W | | - | | - | 26-53 | 49.1% | 34 | 10 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 36 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 53-62 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 19-54 | 35.2% | 35 | 16 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 30 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 45-63 | L | 18.5 | W | | - | 17-47 | 36.2% | 17 | 21 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 40 | 24 | 1/12/2013 | @ BAYLOR | 40-51 | L | 17.5 | W | | - | 15-45 | 33.3% | 33 | 14 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 33 | 10 | 1/16/2013 | KANSAS ST | 54-67 | L | 11.5 | L | 114 | O | 18-48 | 37.5% | 31 | 12 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 34 | 8 | 1/19/2013 | IOWA ST | 50-63 | L | 11.5 | L | | - | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 11 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 38 | 16 | 1/23/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | 50-71 | L | 13.5 | L | 117 | O | 17-44 | 38.6% | 30 | 17 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 42 | 10 | 1/26/2013 | BAYLOR | 56-82 | L | 11.5 | L | | - | 18-54 | 33.3% | 30 | 8 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 40 | 14 | 2/2/2013 | @ TEXAS | 43-60 | L | 12 | L | | - | 17-52 | 32.7% | 33 | 13 | 23-44 | 52.3% | 30 | 11 | 2/6/2013 | KANSAS | 62-55 | W | 17 | W | 118.5 | U | 18-46 | 39.1% | 39 | 11 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 44 | 13 | 2/9/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 50-63 | L | 7.5 | L | | - | 17-47 | 36.2% | 34 | 16 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 23 | 11 | 2/11/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 48-75 | L | 15.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 16-53 | 30.2% | 35 | 16 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 34 | 7 | 2/16/2013 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/2013 | YALE | 80-70 | W | -18.5 | L | | - | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 9 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 39 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | @ KANSAS | 89-97 | L | 11.5 | W | 149 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 45 | 14 | 1/12/2013 | TEXAS | 82-62 | W | -9 | W | 139 | O | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 5 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 11 | 1/16/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 69-67 | W | -8 | L | 143 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 35 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 1/19/2013 | @ TCU | 63-50 | W | -11.5 | W | | - | 28-56 | 50.0% | 38 | 16 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 11 | 1/23/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | 51-56 | L | -10.5 | L | 146 | U | 18-51 | 35.3% | 29 | 11 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 38 | 15 | 1/26/2013 | KANSAS ST | 73-67 | W | -4 | W | | - | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 10 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 28 | 12 | 1/30/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 76-78 | L | 6.5 | W | | - | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 17 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 29 | 8 | 2/2/2013 | BAYLOR | 79-71 | W | -4.5 | W | 148.5 | O | 25-59 | 42.4% | 39 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 35 | 12 | 2/4/2013 | OKLAHOMA | 83-64 | W | -5.5 | W | 143.5 | O | 28-55 | 50.9% | 33 | 10 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 42 | 9 | 2/9/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 70-79 | L | 6.5 | L | 137 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 27 | 20 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 26 | 14 | 2/13/2013 | @ TEXAS | 86-89 | L | 0 | L | | - | 28-80 | 35.0% | 41 | 8 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 43 | 18 | 2/16/2013 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/25/2013 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TCU: Welcome to the Big 12 and the conference's cellar TCU. It will take time for Trent Johnson to rebuild this program, taking over a team that went just .500 in the Mountain West last year. Six-foot-7 swingman Garlon Green (9.9 PPG, 3.4 RPG) will have to bear too much of the brunt for this year's squad, and he won't be enough to make this team threaten to knock off superior teams on most nights. | | IOWA ST: Fred Hoiberg is making strong progress with this Iowa State program, but he will need everything to mesh perfectly for this team to compete this season. He brings in a solid recruit in PF Georges Niang to help fill the void of last year's leading scorer and rebounder Royce White (13.4 PPG, 9.3 RPG) who is now in the NBA. The biggest unknown on this team is how transfer point guard Korie Lucious will fit in after sitting out a year coming from Michigan State. Lucious has seen big moments and could be a force in the conference and will be joined in the backcourt by fellow transfer Will Clyburn, who came over to Hoiberg after averaging 17.1 PPG two seasons ago at Utah. How those two respond to their new conference will determine if this team can be a contender. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 4:29:54 AM EST. |
|
|