|
|
OKLAHOMA IOWA ST |
|
| 143.5 | 64 Final 83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
715 | OKLAHOMA | +200 | 716 | IOWA ST | -250 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-6 | +5.5 | 10-6 | 5-4 | 67.5 | 32.1 | 43.1% | 36.6 | 62.5 | 29.6 | 40.5% | 35.4 | Road Games | 7-4 | +3.9 | 6-4 | 4-3 | 65.0 | 32.0 | 42.8% | 34.8 | 65.7 | 31.9 | 41.7% | 36.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.3 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 62.2 | 27.8 | 44.4% | 34.8 | 65.2 | 28.8 | 41.1% | 36.2 | Conference Games | 6-3 | +3.5 | 5-4 | 3-2 | 68.1 | 31.3 | 44.9% | 36.7 | 64.9 | 30.4 | 39.2% | 36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.5 | 32.1 | 24-57 | 43.1% | 5-15 | 31.6% | 14-19 | 73.4% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.3 | 29 | 22-54 | 41.0% | 6-17 | 32.3% | 13-20 | 66.8% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.0 | 32.0 | 24-57 | 42.8% | 4-15 | 29.4% | 12-18 | 68.7% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.5 | 29.6 | 23-57 | 40.5% | 6-19 | 30.4% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 69.1 | 33 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 14-20 | 68.2% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.7 | 31.9 | 23-56 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 15-6 | -4 | 8-8 | 4-2 | 78.5 | 36.4 | 45.3% | 40.4 | 67.6 | 31.0 | 41.3% | 33.8 | Home Games | 12-0 | +5 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 83.0 | 37.7 | 47.0% | 42.2 | 63.3 | 29.1 | 39.5% | 32.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -4 | 4-1 | 1-1 | 68.4 | 31.8 | 46.0% | 35.0 | 64.4 | 29.6 | 43.5% | 32.6 | Conference Games | 5-3 | -3 | 6-2 | 3-2 | 72.7 | 33.5 | 44.4% | 35.6 | 68.5 | 30.9 | 43.5% | 35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.5 | 36.4 | 28-62 | 45.3% | 9-25 | 35.9% | 13-19 | 69.7% | 40 | 12 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.9 | 30.6 | 23-56 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 13-19 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.0 | 37.7 | 29-62 | 47.0% | 9-25 | 37.2% | 15-21 | 69.8% | 42 | 12 | 17 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.6 | 31.0 | 24-59 | 41.3% | 6-19 | 30.6% | 13-18 | 70.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.1 | 32.6 | 25-56 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-21 | 68.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 63.3 | 29.1 | 24-60 | 39.5% | 6-21 | 29.4% | 10-15 | 68.0% | 33 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA 76.1, IOWA ST 72.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2012 | SF AUSTIN ST | 55-56 | L | | - | | - | 22-58 | 37.9% | 38 | 13 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 13 | 12/29/2012 | OHIO U | 74-63 | W | -3 | W | | - | 27-57 | 47.4% | 33 | 11 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 30 | 18 | 12/31/2012 | TEXAS A&M CC | 72-42 | W | | - | | - | 24-59 | 40.7% | 44 | 13 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 35 | 18 | 1/5/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | 67-57 | W | 5 | W | | - | 27-61 | 44.3% | 40 | 10 | 18-60 | 30.0% | 39 | 14 | 1/12/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | 77-68 | W | -2 | W | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 37 | 13 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 36 | 15 | 1/16/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 81-63 | W | -15.5 | W | | - | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 9 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 14 | 1/19/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 60-69 | L | 7.5 | L | | - | 25-53 | 47.2% | 39 | 16 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 25 | 8 | 1/21/2013 | TEXAS | 73-67 | W | -7.5 | L | 129.5 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 13 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 15 | 1/26/2013 | @ KANSAS | 54-67 | L | 12.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 31 | 11 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 41 | 14 | 1/30/2013 | @ BAYLOR | 74-71 | W | 6.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 29-55 | 52.7% | 34 | 16 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 47 | 14 | 2/2/2013 | KANSAS ST | 50-52 | L | -2.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 38 | 14 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 34 | 10 | 2/4/2013 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2013 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/19/2012 | @ MISSOURI-KC | 76-61 | W | -16.5 | L | | - | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 13 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 21 | 12 | 1/1/2013 | YALE | 80-70 | W | -18.5 | L | | - | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 9 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 39 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | @ KANSAS | 89-97 | L | 11.5 | W | 149 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 45 | 14 | 1/12/2013 | TEXAS | 82-62 | W | -9 | W | 139 | O | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 5 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 11 | 1/16/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 69-67 | W | -8 | L | 143 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 35 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 1/19/2013 | @ TCU | 63-50 | W | -11.5 | W | | - | 28-56 | 50.0% | 38 | 16 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 11 | 1/23/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | 51-56 | L | -10.5 | L | 146 | U | 18-51 | 35.3% | 29 | 11 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 38 | 15 | 1/26/2013 | KANSAS ST | 73-67 | W | -4 | W | | - | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 10 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 28 | 12 | 1/30/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 76-78 | L | 6.5 | W | | - | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 17 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 29 | 8 | 2/2/2013 | BAYLOR | 79-71 | W | -4.5 | W | 148.5 | O | 25-59 | 42.4% | 39 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 35 | 12 | 2/4/2013 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/25/2013 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OKLAHOMA: In his second year with the Sooners, Lon Kruger will have a team returning all five starters from last year's campaign. With three returning double-digit scorers, the question is if Kruger can guide this team that won just 15 games last season to a more respectable finish. SG Steven Pledger (16.2 PPG, 42% 3-pt FG) is the best of that crew, while forwards Romero Osby (12.9 PPG, 7.3 RPG) and Andrew Fitzgerald (12.1 PPG, 5.0 RPG) will look to form a solid frontcourt that can hopefully help this team eclipse the .500 mark. | | IOWA ST: Fred Hoiberg is making strong progress with this Iowa State program, but he will need everything to mesh perfectly for this team to compete this season. He brings in a solid recruit in PF Georges Niang to help fill the void of last year's leading scorer and rebounder Royce White (13.4 PPG, 9.3 RPG) who is now in the NBA. The biggest unknown on this team is how transfer point guard Korie Lucious will fit in after sitting out a year coming from Michigan State. Lucious has seen big moments and could be a force in the conference and will be joined in the backcourt by fellow transfer Will Clyburn, who came over to Hoiberg after averaging 17.1 PPG two seasons ago at Utah. How those two respond to their new conference will determine if this team can be a contender. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 11:02:57 AM EST. |
|
|